Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

AWS CodeCommit is easier to use than Bitbucket, requiring only an AWS account password and username.
It is simple and affordable, offering essential version control features.
It integrates with AWS CodeGuru for effective code reviews.
Versioning and approval features are highly valuable, similar to GitHub.
It provides excellent customer service and support.

CONS

AWS CodeCommit lacks some features available in Bitbucket, like adding a code reviewer and online repository forking.
Jira provides debugging options that are not available in AWS CodeCommit.
AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket at one dollar per user per month, but it lacks many features.
Migration in and out of AWS CodeCommit could be improved compared to other version controls.
AWS CodeCommit has a cap on file size that is smaller than what GitHub and GitLab offer.
 

AWS CodeCommit Pros review quotes

UT
Jun 2, 2025
What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem.
Ambresh Lingadhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 31, 2023
AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username.
CT
Jan 28, 2025
The solution scalable.
Learn what your peers think about AWS CodeCommit. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1775037 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 27, 2025
The customer service is pretty good.
Anshuman Sen - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 10, 2024
AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews.
Agron Demiraj - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 24, 2024
The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub.
Munisaiteja Narravula - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 2, 2024
AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly.
George Onalo - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 12, 2024
AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up.
Priyam Vaidya - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 10, 2024
The solution's most valuable feature is versioning.
SY
May 13, 2024
It helps us to install our code idea projects.
 

AWS CodeCommit Cons review quotes

UT
Jun 2, 2025
The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab.
Ambresh Lingadhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 31, 2023
There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use.
CT
Jan 28, 2025
There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics.
Learn what your peers think about AWS CodeCommit. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1775037 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 27, 2025
When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide.
Agron Demiraj - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 24, 2024
Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved.
Munisaiteja Narravula - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 2, 2024
There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements.
George Onalo - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 12, 2024
Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.
SY
May 13, 2024
The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper.
Varish Ansari - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 31, 2023
The tool should improve its UI.