AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket Server comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Atlassian are both solutions in the Version Control category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.7% mindshare in VC, compared to Atlassian’s 19.1% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeCommit

Read 13 AWS CodeCommit reviews

819 Views
819 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Read 26 Bitbucket Server reviews

2,354 Views
2,354 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit are competing in the source code management sector. Bitbucket Server has the upper hand for its integration with Atlassian tools, while AWS CodeCommit excels in scalability and AWS integration.

Features: Bitbucket Server includes a powerful branch permissions system, tight integration with JIRA, and customizable workflows for enterprise use. AWS CodeCommit offers scalable repository hosting and integrates seamlessly with AWS services, providing a streamlined experience for users of the AWS ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server could enhance its cloud deployment options and improve scalability to better compete in diverse environments. Additionally, Bitbucket Server might benefit from simplifying its integration with non-Atlassian tools. AWS CodeCommit could improve its feature set by adding more advanced code review options and enhancing its user interface for a more intuitive user experience. Also, expanding support for repositories outside the AWS ecosystem could increase its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server requires on-premise deployment, leading to a more complex initial setup and maintenance process, while benefiting from Atlassian's integrated support. AWS CodeCommit, being a fully managed service, is easier to deploy via AWS infrastructure and benefits from AWS's highly regarded customer support system, offering worldwide assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server requires upfront setup costs and potential additional expenses for scaling, which can positively affect ROI with efficient enterprise deployments. AWS CodeCommit offers a flexible, usage-based pricing model, leading to better cost efficiency for scalable operations, and a potential increase in ROI when integrated effectively with AWS's other offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 4.7%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 19.1%, down from 27.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitbucket Server	19.1%
AWS CodeCommit	4.7%
Other	76.2%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"The solution is quite scalable."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"It is a really good product where you can easily create your repository and integrate it with other tools such as IAM to handle the user and management aspects of the repository."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"It can efficiently promote code to different environments."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."

"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."

"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."

"The most valuable feature is that it has its own pipelines."

"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."

"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."

"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."

More Bitbucket Server pros

Cons

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing."

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

"There are absolutely things that could be improved in collaboration features in Bitbucket Server, with respect to people who are not using it every day, such as managers who need to be able to approve things but don't use Bitbucket Server so often."

"The product's initial setup phase is complex."

"The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects."

"The UI could be enhanced."

"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."

"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."

More Bitbucket Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

Understanding AWS CodeCommit was a hectic job for developers at first, while it was easier for the DevOps team. Even with access, they faced questions and difficulties navigating the service, indic...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?

The positive impact of AWS CodeCommit on my organization was significant, especially transitioning from Subversion (SVN), which was an outdated technology for repositories. It was a very hectic pro...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

There are absolutely things that could be improved in collaboration features in Bitbucket Server, with respect to people who are not using it every day, such as managers who need to be able to appr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

We use Bitbucket Server for storing code. It is a way to manage configuration items, keep track of code, commits, and pull requests.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 59% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 27% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 81% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

Git vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 2% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit

October 2025

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server

October 2025

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

Stash

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server

September 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.