AWS CodeCommit's valuable features include easy integration with AWS services, user-friendly interface, robust security measures with IAM access control, native support for version control, private repositories, branch management, and seamless scalability. It offers effective code approval processes, testing environments, and works well with pipelines like CodePipeline, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy. The platform supports integration with tools such as CloudWatch, CloudTrail, and Git tools, enhancing collaboration and security through permissions and encryption.
- "It is a really good product where you can easily create your repository and integrate it with other tools such as IAM to handle the user and management aspects of the repository."
- "What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."
- "The customer service is pretty good."
AWS CodeCommit lacks certain features found in Bitbucket, such as code reviewers and debugging options. The interface could be more intuitive compared to GitHub or GitLab. Users face challenges with migration processes and integrating third-party tools. There's a need for better documentation and training resources for beginners. Improvements are needed in search functionality and mass change handling. Users desire enhancements in insight analytics and CI/CD visualization to streamline operations and project management.
- "The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems."
- "The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."
- "Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."
