AWS CodeCommit Reviews

Name: AWS CodeCommit
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 4 (2 reviews)

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)

3.8 out of 5

2 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Post review

What is AWS CodeCommit?UNIXBusinessApplication
Price:

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Get the Version Control Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and more!

AWS CodeCommit is the #5 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions. PeerSpot users give AWS CodeCommit an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. AWS CodeCommit is most commonly compared to Bitbucket: AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket. AWS CodeCommit is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 63% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 14% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

April 2024

Get the category report

Helped 768,415 peers since 2012

AWS CodeCommit market share

As of March 2024, the market share of AWS CodeCommit in the Version Control category stands at 8.2%, marking a decrease of 1.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."
"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

Room for Improvement

"The tool should improve its UI."
"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have.Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has.Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

Pricing

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Version Control Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.