AWS CodeCommit Reviews

Users mentioned that AWS CodeCommit significantly improved their project collaboration and management by providing a reliable and scalable repository hosting service. Many users experienced a noticeable reduction in downtime and latency, resulting in enhanced productivity. The ability to integrate seamlessly with other AWS services optimized their workflow while lowering costs associated with self-hosted solutions. Some noted that the secure environment provided by AWS CodeCommit boosted their confidence in code integrity and data safety.

AWS CodeCommit is considered competitively priced, especially for enterprises with 40 to 50 developers, costing around $100 to $150 monthly. The first five active users are free, followed by $1 per additional user per month. While some users found it expensive compared to Azure, others appreciated its cost-effectiveness due to its straightforward pricing based on users and storage. Specific cost details are available on AWS's page, providing enterprise buyers flexibility in management tasks.

• "AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."
• "The solution is expensive."
• "As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

Organizations primarily use AWS CodeCommit as their Git repository for application code and infrastructure. It enables version control, continuous integration, and deployment setups, supporting EC2 and S3 environments. Users leverage it for seamless commit changes, integration with deployment servers, and creating CI/CD pipelines. Repository management features like branch protection and notifications are valued, especially when transitioning from systems like SVN. AWS CodeCommit is also beneficial for existing customer workloads while exploring other systems for newer clients.

AWS CodeCommit's customer service and support are highly regarded, with technical teams responsive and effective. Users mention fast responses, efficient assistance, and meeting expectations, often rating it nine out of ten. Experiences include resolving technical issues and collaborating closely at various project stages. While AWS support levels vary, overall feedback highlights strong performance, even though some find access constraints challenging due to lack of direct contacts. AWS support is valued for strict but timely protocols.

AWS CodeCommit's initial setup is frequently described as easier than Bitbucket and Azure. Most find the installation process straightforward, taking between one minute to two hours, depending on experience with AWS. Many quickly learn to integrate and manage repositories. Some rely on YouTube tutorials for guidance, while others report minor issues with VS Code. Generally, users agree that setup and maintenance are manageable.

AWS CodeCommit is considered very scalable. Users appreciate its ability to scale up or down as needed without encountering bottlenecks. Backed by S3, it handles multiple developer access efficiently and remains competitively priced. Many find AWS CodeCommit's scalability convenient for deployment purposes. There are no technical issues related to its scalability, and it supports prioritizing deployment without concerns about capacity constraints.

AWS CodeCommit is widely regarded as stable, with many reporting no issues. Some note minor hiccups such as latency during significant releases, which led to adjustments in merge times. A few encountered unexpected access drops during deployments without prior warnings. Despite these instances, most do not face recurring stability problems. A limitation involves handling large file comparisons, but Amazon's self-management generally assures consistent performance.