AWS CodeCommit vs Liquibase comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Liquibase are both solutions in the Version Control category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Liquibase is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.0% mindshare in VC, compared to Liquibase’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Liquibase users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeCommit

Read 13 AWS CodeCommit reviews

743 Views
743 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Liquibase

Read 3 Liquibase reviews

639 Views
639 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Liquibase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Liquibase and AWS CodeCommit compete in database change management and version control. Liquibase seems to have the upper hand due to its detailed feature set and ease of deployment, while AWS CodeCommit is praised for robust features and integration with other AWS tools.

Features: Liquibase offers powerful change automation, tracking capabilities, and specialized database management. AWS CodeCommit integrates seamlessly with AWS tools, provides comprehensive version control, and offers versatility within the AWS ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Liquibase needs better documentation, more intuitive setup processes, and broader user support. AWS CodeCommit would benefit from improved performance speed, support for non-AWS integrations, and better user guidance for non-AWS environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Liquibase is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. AWS CodeCommit simplifies deployment for existing AWS users but can be complex for others, integrating well within AWS infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: Liquibase is cost-effective with good setup costs and long-term ROI. AWS CodeCommit is more expensive initially but offers high ROI for large-scale deployments within the AWS ecosystem. Liquibase provides value for database-focused projects, while AWS CodeCommit suits those needing comprehensive version control within AWS.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Liquibase

Ranking in Version Control

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.0%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Liquibase is 4.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS CodeCommit	5.0%
Liquibase	4.4%
Other	90.6%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Uma Tulasi

DevOps Engineer at Huntington Bank

Seamless integration enhances team collaboration and process efficiency

The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab. Simple things such as viewing directory structures or browsing through commit history and pull request flow could use serious upgrades. We had to create workarounds for features that come standard elsewhere, such as automatically assigning reviewers based on code ownership and setting up required review templates. The search functionality is another pain point, as trying to find specific code across repositories is limited. At Walgreens, we had a large mono repo for our pharmacy services code, and developers constantly complained about how difficult it was to search through it effectively in AWS CodeCommit. I also wish it had better CI/CD visualization built in.

Read full review

Sudheer Kumar Jamjam

Technical Lead Cloud DevOps Engineer at Deloitte

Offers integration with multiple databases, stable product and reduced our manual intervention

I would recommend using it. To learn Liquibase, one should have some database knowledge. If the person is from a DBA background, they would be able to learn quickly. But if they are from an application or infrastructure role, it's medium complex. Before getting started, you should thoroughly go through the documentation and follow the latest changes deployed by the Liquibase product team. Basically, when using the product, you should be able to understand it and stay updated on the latest releases. Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten. Organizations should have this kind of tool to reduce manual intervention. The one point they could improve on is documentation, which they haven't clarified, and they need to work on that a lot.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"The most valuable features of AWS CodeCommit include the least privilege access from IAM, where permissions are granted only for the specific repository the developer is working on, which allows for hundreds of repositories with controlled access per project."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."

"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."

"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."

"The pricing is quite high."

"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"Liquibase is an open-source solution."

"The pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

28%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a good product to use when you also have to use CodePipeline because it is all integrated in the same system, which is beneficial. However, the integration with other code pipelin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a version control system integrated directly in the cloud environment, similar to GitHub, GitLab, and other platforms. It offers every single benefit of using any other version co...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Liquibase?

Liquibase is an open-source solution. If you are using Liquibase, you need to update its license. I think Liquibase is affordable for our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Liquibase?

We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Liquibase?

I have worked on the Liquibase commands, Liquibase updates, Liquibase storeback, and some basic commands from Liquibase. We were using the Docker image installed from the AWS CI/CD, downloading thi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 43% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 29% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 14% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 14% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Git vs Liquibase

Compared 25% of the time

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Liquibase

Compared 21% of the time

Bitbucket vs Liquibase

Compared 19% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Liquibase

Compared 19% of the time

GitHub vs Liquibase

Compared 16% of the time

More Liquibase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit

January 2026

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

January 2026

Download Liquibase product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Liquibase is a migration-based open source database version control solution that relies on a changelog to track what changesets have been deployed to a database, and what additional changesets needs to be applied to a database in order to migrate a database schema to a specific version. Liquibase supports an XML model for defining changesets so that database schema changes can easily be translated to another DBMS platforms. As an open source solution, Liquibase is ideal for smaller teams and projects or for teams that have ample time to invest in extending and adapting the open source capability to meet their needs.

Liquibase

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Nike, JP Morgan Chase, Bancolombia, UPS, Anthem

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase

December 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.