AWS CodeCommit vs IBM Rational ClearCase comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the Version Control category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.9% mindshare in VC, compared to IBM’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of IBM users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeCommit

Read 11 AWS CodeCommit reviews

1,040 Views
821 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

IBM Rational ClearCase

Read 6 IBM Rational ClearCase reviews

608 Views
367 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

IBM Rational ClearCase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

IBM Rational ClearCase and AWS CodeCommit are both prominent tools in the version control space. AWS CodeCommit seems to have the upper hand in features and deployment ease, while ClearCase garners praise for its comprehensive capabilities.

Features: IBM Rational ClearCase offers extensive enterprise-level capabilities such as dynamic views, advanced configuration management, and comprehensive change control. AWS CodeCommit is praised for seamless CI/CD integration, scalability, and ease of use, making it appealing to modern, cloud-based solutions.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational ClearCase users often mention the need for enhancements in performance, system complexity reduction, and a more intuitive user interface. AWS CodeCommit users point out the necessity for better support for large binary files, richer analytics, and expanded support for third-party integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational ClearCase is noted for its complexity in deployment, often requiring specialized knowledge. Customer service is viewed as competent but sometimes slow. AWS CodeCommit is praised for quick, hassle-free deployment and efficient customer service. Users find AWS CodeCommit more accessible and better supported.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational ClearCase is perceived as higher in cost with slower ROI due to its complexity and deployment overhead. AWS CodeCommit is cost-effective, offering rapid ROI because of its pricing structure and cloud-native advantages. Users generally feel AWS CodeCommit provides better value for money.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. IBM Rational ClearCase Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Rational ClearCase

Ranking in Version Control

9th

Average Rating

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.9%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational ClearCase is 4.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Daniel Antonio Jimenez Quintana

IT Systems Architect at Banco Ripley

Difficult to use, not efficient, but stable

We are using IBM Rational ClearCase in Peru at two large banks for a code repository. However, it is not meant to be used as a repository I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly. I have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment."

"IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."

"The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, including some change management tools. The overall process was normal."

Cons

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool."

"The protection needs to be improved."

"I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"The solution is expensive."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive."

"This is a very expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab. Simple things...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Rational ClearCase?

The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, in...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational ClearCase?

IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational ClearCase?

The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 68% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 24% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Git vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 45% of the time

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 24% of the time

Bitbucket vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 17% of the time

GitHub vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Subversion vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Rational ClearCase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit

June 2025

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Configuration Management

May 2025

Download IBM Rational ClearCase product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

Rational ClearCase

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM Rational ClearCase is an enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets, including requirements, design documents, models, test plans and test results. It be can be integrated with other IBM solutions, including IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational ClearQuest, IBM Rational Asset Manager and IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software.

IBM

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Atos SE, FEI, STM

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

June 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeCommit vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. IBM Rational ClearCase and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeCommit vs. IBM Rational ClearCase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.