AWS CodeCommit Reviews

We use AWS CodeCommit to store data, create instances and work on them.

AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username.

There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have.

Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has.

Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use.

I have recently started working on AWS CodeCommit for the past month. I don’t have a specific role in AWS. I am a data engineer and use the solution for my purposes.

The solution is stable.

The solution is very scalable. Currently, only my team uses AWS CodeCommit. There are around eight to nine users. Other than that, everyone else is using Bitbucket, GitLab and Redfish.

The technical support is good.

Positive

The initial setup is easier than Bitbucket. It took around 15 to 20 minutes to install AWS CodeCommit with the help of YouTube videos. 

As for maintenance, it is easy to maintain. Pretty much easier than Bitbucket.

I did the deployment myself with the help of YouTube videos. 

As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things.

We can't fork online, and we can't integrate directly with Bitbucket. Also, you don't have Jira or debugging and code debugging options. Additionally, we can't add a reviewer or repository code reviewer. When we give the full request, we can't mention anyone's name to which we want to add a full request. Overall, I would rate AWS CodeCommit a seven out of ten.

We use the solution for Git purposes and to deploy the EC2 tool.

It helps us to install our code idea projects.

The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper.

I have been using AWS CodeCommit for one year.

The user interfaces of Bitbucket and GitHub are very friendly. GitHub is an open-source tool that is completely free, while Bitbucket has a public repository.

The initial setup takes one to two hours to complete.

The solution is expensive.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap. 

need some simple way to Cross-account access of Repository and CICD pipeline  . 

I have been using the product for few months. 

AWS CodeCommit is stable and flexible. 

The product has good support. We use AWS support, and they give fast responses. 

The tool's installation has no problems. I have encountered issues with the opening of VS Code. 

I rate the product an eight out of ten.