Azure Local integrates on-premises infrastructure with cloud services, offering tools for software-defined networking, Kubernetes deployment, and VM management. It ensures cost efficiency through existing Microsoft licenses and robust disaster recovery, despite some complexities in deployment.


| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Stack HCI | 3.2% |
| VxRail | 13.8% |
| VMware vSAN | 11.4% |
| Other | 71.6% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware vSAN | 4.2 | 11.4% | 87% | 234 interviewsAdd to research |
| VxRail | 4.3 | 13.8% | 94% | 134 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 85 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 41 |
| Large Enterprise | 179 |
Azure Local is designed for businesses needing a blend of local and cloud services while remaining compliant with data privacy regulations. It excels in environments demanding high computing power, software-defined networking, and seamless scaling through Azure Kubernetes Service and Azure DevOps. Although it offers excellent VM management and analytics capabilities with Microsoft Fabric, deployment complexity and operational challenges remain. Businesses looking for a robust edge computing solution find significant benefits, especially with efficient local Azure storage and advanced hardware such as the latest processors and SSDs. There are areas needing improvements like multi-cluster management, stability, and Initial setup, which can be cumbersome. Pricing can be a concern against competitors, and enhanced support and training are needed for smoother user experience.
What are the key features of Azure Local?Azure Local finds application in sectors like manufacturing and maritime operations where robust edge computing helps in seamless data management and analytics. Factories benefit from compliance with data privacy rules while blended local and cloud services improve efficiency on ships, providing an alternative to VMware with support for virtual desktops and SQL Managed Instances.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| IT Solution Architect at a educational organization with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | We transitioned from VMware to Azure Stack HCI to cut costs using existing Microsoft licenses. It's stable and performs well, though it lacks maturity, has migration challenges, and inconsistent Azure Arc integration hampers management. |
| Iinfrastructure Architect at Ministry Of Justice | 3.5 | I've used Azure Stack HCI for integrated compute and disaster recovery; while it's matured and supports edge computing well, initial setup was difficult, costs are high, and licensing and long-term hardware support remain key concerns. |
| Business Solutions Sales Manager at Fortevento | 3.5 | I found Azure Local ideal for clients needing on-premises infrastructure with cloud integration, though deployment is harder with more nodes. It's affordable, especially with Windows Server, and Microsoft Fabric enhances analytics. Support varies but is better with advanced plans. |
| Solution Architect DC at Natilik | 3.5 | I use Azure Stack HCI for local computing with cloud integration, enjoying Azure Site Recovery, efficient storage, and Azure Arc. While there's ROI in time savings and reduced footprint, the storage architecture and Hyper V need improvement compared to VMware. |
| AG at SIS. | 4.0 | We chose Azure Stack HCI for its high computing power, latest processor, SSD, and 25 GB network, which outperform other tools in Kubernetes environments. Despite stability issues needing more version updates, the ROI is still favorable compared to alternatives like VxRail. |
| Cloud solution architect at 0 | 4.0 | In my experience with Azure Stack HCI, I value its software-defined networking and the capability to run Azure Kubernetes Service on-premises. However, improvements in operational complexity and deployment processes are needed for greater efficiency. |
| Engineering Technologist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I recommend Azure Stack HCI for its strong data center performance, especially with NVMe solutions. While management through Microsoft Azure Portal is limited, it offers cost-effective licensing, particularly for users with Microsoft Software Assurance compared to VMware. |
| AVP at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.5 | I use Azure Stack HCI in my company for VM creation and management. Its most valuable feature is its ability to manage VMs efficiently, though the initial setup can be complex. I've experienced a return on investment with this solution. |