Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Azure Local Logo

Top 10 Azure Local Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Azure Local Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Azure Local based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include VMware vSAN, VxRail, and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Azure Local surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled integration with existing Microsoft services, providing seamless scalability and robust security features, which ensure efficient cloud management and optimization for businesses seeking a reliable local cloud solution.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Azure Local Logo
VMware vSAN
4.2 out of 5
Azure Local Logo
VMware vSAN
4.2 out of 5
VMware vSAN excels in VMware integration and management simplicity, making it ideal for existing VMware users. In comparison, Azure Local's strong Azure integration and hybrid cloud support appeal to businesses seeking a seamless on-premises cloud experience. Pricing and deployment vary between solutions.
Download Azure Local vs. VMware vSAN Report
VMware vSAN incurs higher setup costs with a complex initial configuration, while Azure Local offers a simpler, more budget-friendly installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware vSAN incurs higher setup costs with a complex initial configuration, while Azure Local offers a simpler, more budget-friendly installation process.
Azure Local Logo
VxRail
4.3 out of 5
Azure Local Logo
VxRail
4.3 out of 5
VxRail provides seamless VMware integration, ideal for homogeneity and lifecycle management. In comparison, Azure Local with Azure Stack HCI delivers strong cloud-based management, appealing to those seeking integrated cloud capabilities. Both offer scalability, with VxRail favoring consolidation and Azure Local offering cloud flexibility.
Download Azure Local vs. VxRail Report
VxRail features a higher upfront configuration cost, while Azure Local offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a significant pricing distinction between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
VxRail features a higher upfront configuration cost, while Azure Local offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a significant pricing distinction between these two solutions.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
4.3 out of 5
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure offers high scalability and easy management, appealing to those seeking a cost-effective solution with strong customer support. In comparison, Azure Local provides solid integration with Microsoft investments but faces challenges in cluster management and higher core licensing costs.
Download Azure Local vs. Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) Report
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) requires higher initial setup costs, whereas Azure Local presents a more cost-effective setup option, making Azure the preferable choice for those prioritizing budget efficiency in initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) requires higher initial setup costs, whereas Azure Local presents a more cost-effective setup option, making Azure the preferable choice for those prioritizing budget efficiency in initial implementation.
Azure Local Logo
Dell PowerFlex
4.2 out of 5
Azure Local Logo
Dell PowerFlex
4.2 out of 5
Dell PowerFlex offers robust VMware integration and scalable hardware solutions. In comparison, Azure Local excels in edge computing and integrates seamlessly with Azure services. Dell's pricing and support appeal to cost-conscious buyers, while Azure attracts those needing comprehensive software and cloud integration.
Download Azure Local vs. Dell PowerFlex Report
Dell PowerFlex has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Local, which offers a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell PowerFlex has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Local, which offers a more economical initial investment.
Azure Local Logo
HPE SimpliVity
4.3 out of 5
Azure Local Logo
HPE SimpliVity
4.3 out of 5
HPE SimpliVity is recognized for its management simplicity and efficient data optimization, appealing to those prioritizing ease of use. In comparison, Azure Local attracts businesses seeking strong hybrid cloud integration and edge computing, particularly benefiting those deeply entrenched in Microsoft's ecosystem.
Download Azure Local vs. HPE SimpliVity Report
HPE SimpliVity's setup cost is generally higher due to its comprehensive infrastructure integration, while Azure Local offers a more affordable initial setup, positioning itself as a cost-effective option for those with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE SimpliVity's setup cost is generally higher due to its comprehensive infrastructure integration, while Azure Local offers a more affordable initial setup, positioning itself as a cost-effective option for those with budget constraints.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure
4.0 out of 5
Sangfor HCI appeals to tech buyers prioritizing cost-effectiveness with its scalability and integrated security. In comparison, Azure Local attracts those needing Microsoft's robust features, offering extensive disaster recovery options and strong integration with Microsoft services for a higher price.
Download Azure Local vs. Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure Report
Sangfor HCI offers a competitive setup cost, while Azure Local can be more expensive, impacting initial budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Sangfor HCI offers a competitive setup cost, while Azure Local can be more expensive, impacting initial budget considerations.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
DataCore SANsymphony
4.6 out of 5
DataCore SANsymphony excels in hardware cost-efficiency and flexibility, offering features like continuous data protection and auto-tiering. In comparison, Azure Local provides integrated cloud services and software-defined networking, appealing to those needing strong Azure integration and robust cloud connectivity.
Download Azure Local vs. DataCore SANsymphony Report
DataCore SANsymphony has minimal setup costs, making it budget-friendly, whereas Azure Local involves more substantial upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
DataCore SANsymphony has minimal setup costs, making it budget-friendly, whereas Azure Local involves more substantial upfront expenses.
Azure Local Logo
HPE Alletra dHCI
4.0 out of 5
Azure Local Logo
HPE Alletra dHCI
4.0 out of 5
HPE Alletra dHCI appeals with its advanced replication and AI integration, offering storage optimization and scalability. In comparison, Azure Local provides rich integration with Azure services, excelling in hybrid environments and container support, appealing to buyers valuing seamless cloud and on-premises management.
Download Azure Local vs. HPE Alletra dHCI Report
HPE Alletra dHCI entails higher initial setup costs compared to Azure Local, which offers a more budget-friendly setup experience.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE Alletra dHCI entails higher initial setup costs compared to Azure Local, which offers a more budget-friendly setup experience.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
HPE Hyper Converged
4.1 out of 5
HPE Hyper Converged attracts buyers with competitive pricing, robust scalability, and efficient enterprise integrations. In comparison, Azure Local appeals through advanced security and cloud-native capabilities justified by higher costs. HPE's deployment process is simple, while Azure benefits from Microsoft's extensive support.
Download Azure Local vs. HPE Hyper Converged Report
HPE Hyper Converged offers a lower setup cost, attracting cost-conscious businesses, while Azure Local involves higher initial expenses, reflecting its comprehensive feature suite.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE Hyper Converged offers a lower setup cost, attracting cost-conscious businesses, while Azure Local involves higher initial expenses, reflecting its comprehensive feature suite.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
Scale Computing Platform
4.0 out of 5
Scale Computing Platform offers cost-effectiveness with simplicity and support, ideal for budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Azure Local provides advanced features like AI integration and scalability, making it attractive for enterprises prioritizing comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.
Download Azure Local vs. Scale Computing Platform Report
Scale Computing Platform offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Azure Local presents a more complex pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Scale Computing Platform offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Azure Local presents a more complex pricing structure.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes
4.3 out of 5
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes offer streamlined resource management and VMware integration, ideal for traditional data centers. In comparison, Azure Local enhances VM management and leverages existing Microsoft licenses, appealing to organizations seeking cost-efficient hybrid cloud solutions with seamless Azure integration.
Download Azure Local vs. Dell vSAN Ready Nodes Report
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes have a higher initial setup cost compared to Azure Local, highlighting cost-efficiency. Azure Local presents a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes have a higher initial setup cost compared to Azure Local, highlighting cost-efficiency. Azure Local presents a more budget-friendly option.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
4.8 out of 5
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance emphasizes redundancy and cost-effectiveness with seamless management and high availability. In comparison, Azure Local offers an on-premises cloud experience with strong Azure Arc integration, making it ideal for organizations within Microsoft's ecosystem seeking cloud-like capabilities.
Download Azure Local vs. StarWind HyperConverged Appliance Report
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance offers competitive setup costs compared to Azure Local, which may have higher initial expenditure. Each solution presents distinct cost structures, highlighting potential budgetary impacts on deployment decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance offers competitive setup costs compared to Azure Local, which may have higher initial expenditure. Each solution presents distinct cost structures, highlighting potential budgetary impacts on deployment decisions.
Azure Local Logo
Verge.io
1 out of 5
Azure Local Logo
Verge.io
1 out of 5
Azure Local offers cost-effectiveness and seamless Microsoft integration. In comparison, Verge.io emphasizes advanced virtualization features, providing comprehensive management and scalability. Azure Local suits budget-focused businesses, while Verge.io attracts those seeking powerful, adaptable virtualization for complex IT environments.
Azure Local's setup cost is significantly higher, emphasizing its comprehensive infrastructure, while Verge.io offers competitive pricing, making it a cost-effective solution for smaller businesses seeking budget-friendly options in cloud services.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Local's setup cost is significantly higher, emphasizing its comprehensive infrastructure, while Verge.io offers competitive pricing, making it a cost-effective solution for smaller businesses seeking budget-friendly options in cloud services.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure offers cost-effectiveness and strong support, appealing to those seeking rapid deployment. In comparison, Azure Local's seamless cloud integration and advanced analytics attract buyers prioritizing integration and long-term ROI despite higher initial costs. Both solutions present distinct benefits for different needs.
Download Azure Local vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Report
Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure has higher initial setup costs, whereas Azure Local offers a more budget-friendly option. Both products present distinct pricing models that cater to different budgetary requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure has higher initial setup costs, whereas Azure Local offers a more budget-friendly option. Both products present distinct pricing models that cater to different budgetary requirements.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
Lenovo ThinkAgile HX Series
4.0 out of 5
Lenovo ThinkAgile HX Series excels in deployment flexibility and virtualization, making it ideal for hybrid cloud scenarios. In comparison, Azure Local offers advanced analytics and Microsoft integration, appealing to businesses seeking extensive cloud-syncing and comprehensive AI-driven data analysis capabilities.
Download Azure Local vs. Lenovo ThinkAgile HX Series Report
Lenovo ThinkAgile HX Series offers a cost-efficient setup, while Azure Local's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Lenovo ThinkAgile HX Series offers a cost-efficient setup, while Azure Local's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes
4.5 out of 5
Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes offer cost-effective storage, streamlined configuration, and efficient workload management with user-friendly deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, Azure Local excels in cloud integration and hybrid support, offering advanced scalability and long-term flexibility for complex environments.
Download Azure Local vs. Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes Report
Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes incur notable setup costs, whereas Azure Local offers a more cost-effective installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes incur notable setup costs, whereas Azure Local offers a more cost-effective installation.
Azure Local Logo
Azure Local Logo
Lenovo ThinkAgile MX Certified Node
3.5 out of 5
Lenovo ThinkAgile MX Certified Node offers cost-effective infrastructure with scalability and reliability, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Azure Local excels in offering a comprehensive cloud service suite with advanced analytics, ideal for organizations seeking deep integration with Microsoft's ecosystem and long-term ROI.
Lenovo ThinkAgile MX Certified Node offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs compared to Azure Local, which provides a more flexible setup with potentially higher startup costs. Both solutions cater to different initial budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Lenovo ThinkAgile MX Certified Node offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs compared to Azure Local, which provides a more flexible setup with potentially higher startup costs. Both solutions cater to different initial budget considerations.

Related categories

HCI
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
Software Defined Data Center (SDDC)