

Dell vSAN Ready Nodes and Azure Local (formerly Azure Stack HCI) compete in the hyper-converged infrastructure category. Azure Local has an edge due to its superior cloud integration capabilities.
Features: Dell vSAN Ready Nodes provide excellent storage management, flexibility, and easy scalability with seamless integration into the VMware ecosystem. Their file-sharing capabilities and storage management by profiles enhance user experience. Azure Local is distinguished by its cloud integration, especially with Azure Arc, and supports efficient use of Microsoft Azure Services, software-defined networking, and Azure Kubernetes Services for high performance.
Room for Improvement: Dell vSAN Ready Nodes need improvements in scalability and pricing flexibility, better public cloud integration, and faster deployment. Azure Local's deployment processes require refinement, including managing software-defined networking and better Azure management portal integration. More intuitive operational management and enhancements in storage architecture are also needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell vSAN Ready Nodes offer reliable technical support, though response times and issue resolution complexity pose challenges. Azure Local provides extensive documentation and training but can be difficult in setup, particularly with scalability and some specific configuration issues.
Pricing and ROI: Dell vSAN Ready Nodes have a higher pricing structure compared to competitors like Lenovo and HPE but offer operational cost savings through VMware integration. Azure Local leverages existing Microsoft licenses for cost efficiencies within the Microsoft ecosystem, though its licensing remains high. Both solutions are noted for offering significant ROI through efficient platform capabilities and management.
There has been some return on investment in terms of just time usability and reduction of footprint.
The OPEX benefits are around 30 to 40% because the same engineer who manages vSphere can handle Dell vSAN Ready Nodes, eliminating the need for additional support engineers.
They have more advantages than VMware, especially for containerization, and they provide good support as well.
Not every support team member is very knowledgeable about Azure Stack HCI, creating delays in resolution.
Whether we have pro support plus or just the basic level, they are helpful and reliable as long as we provide the necessary details.
There is always room for improvement in terms of response time and reaching knowledgeable staff quickly.
If we require a replacement part, the engagement is usually within four hours
With VCF we have significant automation built-in within the VCF console within SDDC manager as the primary management console.
I would rate scalability around seven because when customers want to expand capacity but all the drive slots are full, they are forced to buy new servers or nodes which adds more costs with licenses and hardware.
It does not feel like a well-oiled machine yet, with too many idiosyncrasies and insufficient documentation and integration, feeling more like software that is still in beta.
After achieving good maturity, it became easier.
A disk group for five disks can be problematic, and customers need to tolerate downtime if the disk is not available.
Microsoft has decided to discontinue stretched cluster technology completely, which is disappointing.
Hyper V seems to lag behind compared to VMware.
There could be improvements with Azure Stack HCI regarding the license and price, as they have significantly higher prices compared to other competitors.
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes are useful as a product, but the lack of expansion with VMware has led customers to refrain from further upgrades.
I would want VMware to ensure that when there's a hardware failure on a host, it should gracefully migrate the VMs to another host available in the cluster without restarting, which would be a great improvement.
A faster firmware lifecycle with the release of validated firmware catalogs more quickly would be a desired improvement.
The licensing is quite expensive because it's per call.
As a group under Comcast, we receive very good pricing from Dell due to our considerable business dealings.
Azure Stack HCI has been very beneficial for disaster recovery operations.
The integration with Azure using Azure Arc is excellent.
The benefit of using vSAN is that it's easy to manage on vCenter. You can see if there are issues, get recommendations, and overall, it's highly fault-free which is beneficial because we want to minimize downtime.
The ability for single-team management without requiring a separate storage team for managing arrays and fiber channel switches is also a valuable feature.
I would say in-house management, administration, and storage policies are the three key differentiators compared to normal non-Dell vSAN Ready Nodes where we are leveraging external storage.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Dell vSAN Ready Nodes | 2.4% |
| Azure Local | 2.9% |
| Other | 94.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Azure Local integrates on-premises infrastructure with cloud services, offering tools for software-defined networking, Kubernetes deployment, and VM management. It ensures cost efficiency through existing Microsoft licenses and robust disaster recovery, despite some complexities in deployment.
Azure Local is designed for businesses needing a blend of local and cloud services while remaining compliant with data privacy regulations. It excels in environments demanding high computing power, software-defined networking, and seamless scaling through Azure Kubernetes Service and Azure DevOps. Although it offers excellent VM management and analytics capabilities with Microsoft Fabric, deployment complexity and operational challenges remain. Businesses looking for a robust edge computing solution find significant benefits, especially with efficient local Azure storage and advanced hardware such as the latest processors and SSDs. There are areas needing improvements like multi-cluster management, stability, and Initial setup, which can be cumbersome. Pricing can be a concern against competitors, and enhanced support and training are needed for smoother user experience.
What are the key features of Azure Local?Azure Local finds application in sectors like manufacturing and maritime operations where robust edge computing helps in seamless data management and analytics. Factories benefit from compliance with data privacy rules while blended local and cloud services improve efficiency on ships, providing an alternative to VMware with support for virtual desktops and SQL Managed Instances.
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes provide high availability, flexibility, and ease of deployment with integrated storage management designed for seamless VMware integration and IT modernization.
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes excel in managing workloads with enhanced storage availability and adaptability. They allow single-team administration, minimizing dependency on multiple vendors and offering robust performance and stability. The user-friendly interface ensures ease of deployment and management, enhancing data protection and operational efficiency. Despite these strengths, challenges like automation, complex upgrades, and licensing limitations affect scalability and cost-efficiency compared to competitors.
What are the key features of Dell vSAN Ready Nodes?Organizations deploy Dell vSAN Ready Nodes for general virtualization, hyper-converged infrastructure, and private cloud setups. They are primarily installed on-premises for managing critical servers, allowing expansion into cloud environments. Popular in sectors like government, pharmaceuticals, hospitality, and insurance, they support VMware vSphere, ERP applications, and virtual desktops efficiently.
We monitor all HCI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.