AWS CodeCommit offers ease of use, seamless AWS integration, no complex authentication, and cost-effectiveness. It features code versioning, approval options, and user-friendly interface. It's scalable with private repositories, enhanced security, and IAM-based access control. The integration with CodePipeline, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy simplifies workflow. Built-in encryption, triggers, and Git support add value. Its deployment in environments like Huntington and Walgreens enables secure code management and efficient pipeline configurations using native AWS tools.
- "What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."
- "The customer service is pretty good."
- "The customer service is pretty good."
AWS CodeCommit's lack of features like code reviewers, repository forking, and debugging hinders its functionality. Its user interface and Git integration are basic compared to Bitbucket, GitHub, and GitLab. Migration processes and file size limits are inconvenient. Insight Analytics could benefit from a sophisticated dashboard. Integration with third-party tools, such as Jira and Jenkins, is inadequate. A better CI/CD visualization and improved search functionality could enhance user experience. Pricing transparency is needed, along with beginner tutorials.
- "The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."
- "Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."
- "When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."
