AWS CodeCommit vs Apache Subversion comparison

Apache and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Version Control category. Apache is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9. Apache holds a 1.2% mindshare in VC, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

Apache Subversion

Read 4 Apache Subversion reviews

191 Views
107 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Read 10 AWS CodeCommit reviews

1,174 Views
981 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Apache Subversion and AWS CodeCommit are both popular repository management tools. AWS CodeCommit's features are considered superior and worth the additional cost.

Features: Apache Subversion offers robust version control, extensive third-party integration, and strong pricing and support. AWS CodeCommit is prized for its scalability, seamless Git integration, and support for AWS ecosystem services. AWS CodeCommit is generally seen as more feature-rich.

Room for Improvement: Apache Subversion has limited scalability and complex merge conflict resolution. AWS CodeCommit experiences occasional latency issues and has a steep learning curve for new users. Subversion’s scalability concerns are more critical.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Subversion has straightforward deployment, but some users find customer service lacking. AWS CodeCommit offers easier deployment within the AWS ecosystem and has strong customer support. AWS CodeCommit stands out for its seamless deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Subversion's setup costs are lower and users report a stronger ROI. AWS CodeCommit’s pricing is perceived as higher but justified by its advanced features. Despite its higher cost, the overall ROI for AWS CodeCommit is favorable for those integrating into the AWS ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Apache Subversion Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Apache Subversion

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 6.3%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

YATIM Khalid

Engineering Manager at Docaposte

Centralized repository, but the stability could improve

Apache Subversion is a scalable solution. We have our personal service, and we were nine developers. In our company the whole company uses the same instances for Git, but in but last five years, we have had one instance, per project. For one instance, there were ten to twenty users.

Read full review

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."

"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"The solution scalable."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

Cons

"The most valuable feature is CLI."

"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is good."

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Subversion?

We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

The tool's price is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

The tool's deployment is complex.

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price. Compared to Azure, AWS is more expensive, and that's the trend.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics. A built-in dashboard with advanced analytics, like commit frequencies and pull request trends, could be added. These features would help gain dee...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub vs Apache Subversion

Compared 56% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 44% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 75% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 25% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

March 2025

Download Apache Subversion product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit

April 2025

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Also Known As

No data available

CodeCommit

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

Apache

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Apache Subversion

April 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeCommit vs. Apache Subversion

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Apache Subversion and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Apache Subversion report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.