AWS CodeCommit vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,006 Views
1,006 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Git and AWS CodeCommit compete in the version control and source code management category. AWS CodeCommit has the upper hand due to its integration and security features, yet Git's pricing and simplicity make it more appealing for some users.

Features: Git is appreciated for its straightforward version control, extensive community support, and broader range of integrations with various development tools. AWS CodeCommit users value its seamless integration with other AWS services, enhanced security features, and cloud-specific capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Git users often desire better support for large files, improved conflict resolution tools, and more native enterprise-level features. AWS CodeCommit users suggest enhancements in stability, an easier setup process, and better onboarding resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Git is known for its quick setup across multiple environments and responsive community-driven support. AWS CodeCommit provides a smoother experience within the AWS ecosystem but requires more thorough initial configuration. Customer support for AWS is robust, though some users find Git's community support faster for troubleshooting common issues.

Pricing and ROI: Git stands out with its free open-source nature, making it cost-effective for many. AWS CodeCommit incurs additional costs due to AWS service integration but offers greater value for users needing comprehensive cloud-based solutions. Git is favored for smaller teams and individual projects, whereas AWS CodeCommit demonstrates better return on investment for organizations heavily utilizing AWS infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Git Report (Updated: November 2025).

Download the complete report

AWS CodeCommit vs. Git

November 2025

Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 4.9%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 10.6%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS CodeCommit	4.9%
Git	10.6%
Other	84.5%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Andrea-Carella

DevOps Engineer at GFT Group

Has improved repository management through policy customization but needs better integration with external tools

AWS CodeCommit is a good product to use when you also have to use CodePipeline because it is all integrated in the same system, which is beneficial. However, the integration with other code pipeline tools outside the AWS world is uncertain, as there has been no experience with that integration. The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems. To improve the adoption of AWS CodeCommit with respect to others that are more used in the market, something would need to be done to increase market share, as people are often more educated to use GitLab or GitHub. AWS CodeCommit is quite easy to learn in general, but competitors have a bigger market share in this particular area for many reasons.

Read full review

Grazvydas Govaras

Senior Solution Architect at Danske

Helps to store and version the code

We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches. I would like to see less updates with the product. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"It is a really good product where you can easily create your repository and integrate it with other tools such as IAM to handle the user and management aspects of the repository."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"The solution scalable."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."

"The scalability of the solution is good."

"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."

"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."

"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."

"Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

More Git pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"The scalability could be better. I think it requires some discipline to have large teams working on the same project without facing problems merging code. I'm using Git for personal projects, but I know companies face merge conflicts when more than one person is working on code simultaneously."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."

"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."

"I would like to see less updates with the product."

"The product needs to improve its UI."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"The solution is expensive."

"The platform is less expensive."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"We use the open-source version."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"Git is an open-source software."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

Understanding AWS CodeCommit was a hectic job for developers at first, while it was easier for the DevOps team. Even with access, they faced questions and difficulties navigating the service, indic...

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?

The positive impact of AWS CodeCommit on my organization was significant, especially transitioning from Subversion (SVN), which was an outdated technology for repositories. It was a very hectic pro...

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 57% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 27% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 16% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 30% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 8% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

AWS CodeCommit

November 2025

Download Git product report

October 2025

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse