AWS CodeCommit vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,105 Views
673 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Git and AWS CodeCommit compete in the version control and source code management category. AWS CodeCommit has the upper hand due to its integration and security features, yet Git's pricing and simplicity make it more appealing for some users.

Features: Git is appreciated for its straightforward version control, extensive community support, and broader range of integrations with various development tools. AWS CodeCommit users value its seamless integration with other AWS services, enhanced security features, and cloud-specific capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Git users often desire better support for large files, improved conflict resolution tools, and more native enterprise-level features. AWS CodeCommit users suggest enhancements in stability, an easier setup process, and better onboarding resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Git is known for its quick setup across multiple environments and responsive community-driven support. AWS CodeCommit provides a smoother experience within the AWS ecosystem but requires more thorough initial configuration. Customer support for AWS is robust, though some users find Git's community support faster for troubleshooting common issues.

Pricing and ROI: Git stands out with its free open-source nature, making it cost-effective for many. AWS CodeCommit incurs additional costs due to AWS service integration but offers greater value for users needing comprehensive cloud-based solutions. Git is favored for smaller teams and individual projects, whereas AWS CodeCommit demonstrates better return on investment for organizations heavily utilizing AWS infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Git Report (Updated: June 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 858,038 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.9%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 8.2%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Hari Kathireshan

Sr PHP Developer at GE

An easy-to-use solution that can be used for configuration management

We use Git for configuration management Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working. Git's user interface could be improved. I have been using Git for almost eight years. Git is a stable solution. Git is a scalable solution. Around 2,000 users use the solution in our…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."

"The setup process is pretty simple."

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."

"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."

"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."

"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."

More Git pros

Cons

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"The main problem for me is the frequent upgrades in the solution because every other upgrade is a minefield. When you do the upgrade, there is always something that doesn't work."

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"The platform is less expensive."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is an open-source software."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab. Simple things...

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 68% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 24% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 38% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 16% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download Git product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

AWS CodeCommit vs. Git