AWS CodeCommit vs Git comparison

Read 39 Git reviews

5,876 Views
5,876 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Git and AWS CodeCommit compete in the version control and source code management category. AWS CodeCommit has the upper hand due to its integration and security features, yet Git's pricing and simplicity make it more appealing for some users.

Features: Git is appreciated for its straightforward version control, extensive community support, and broader range of integrations with various development tools. AWS CodeCommit users value its seamless integration with other AWS services, enhanced security features, and cloud-specific capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Git users often desire better support for large files, improved conflict resolution tools, and more native enterprise-level features. AWS CodeCommit users suggest enhancements in stability, an easier setup process, and better onboarding resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Git is known for its quick setup across multiple environments and responsive community-driven support. AWS CodeCommit provides a smoother experience within the AWS ecosystem but requires more thorough initial configuration. Customer support for AWS is robust, though some users find Git's community support faster for troubleshooting common issues.

Pricing and ROI: Git stands out with its free open-source nature, making it cost-effective for many. AWS CodeCommit incurs additional costs due to AWS service integration but offers greater value for users needing comprehensive cloud-based solutions. Git is favored for smaller teams and individual projects, whereas AWS CodeCommit demonstrates better return on investment for organizations heavily utilizing AWS infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Git Report (Updated: September 2026).

AWS CodeCommit vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 914,889 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 4.4%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 18.9%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Git	18.9%
AWS CodeCommit	4.4%
Other	76.7%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Andrea-Carella

DevOps Engineer at Sorint

Has improved repository management through policy customization but needs better integration with external tools

AWS CodeCommit is a good product to use when you also have to use CodePipeline because it is all integrated in the same system, which is beneficial. However, the integration with other code pipeline tools outside the AWS world is uncertain, as there has been no experience with that integration. The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems. To improve the adoption of AWS CodeCommit with respect to others that are more used in the market, something would need to be done to increase market share, as people are often more educated to use GitLab or GitHub. AWS CodeCommit is quite easy to learn in general, but competitors have a bigger market share in this particular area for many reasons.

Read full review

Davide Cariola

Ed Tech Project Manager at Aulab

Branching has streamlined collaboration and now ensures safer, accountable code changes

I feel that the best features of Git are its reliable branching model and fast commits. The ability to track every change with a full history and accountability is invaluable. Git's branching model and change tracking have helped my projects significantly, especially in a recent multi-developer Laravel project where several features were developed in parallel. By isolating each feature on its own branch, the team avoided conflicts and could review work incrementally. When a critical bug appeared in production, Git's history and diff made it easier to identify the exact commit that introduced the issue and rollback safely without disrupting the ongoing development. This combination of isolated branches, clear commit history, and reliable rollback capability kept the project stable while allowing fast iteration. Git has positively impacted my organization by standardizing collaboration, reducing integration conflicts, and making parallel development far more efficient. The branching model allowed teams to work independently without blocking each other. The clear commit history improved code reviews and accountability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"The solution is quite scalable."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"The most valuable features of AWS CodeCommit include the least privilege access from IAM, where permissions are granted only for the specific repository the developer is working on, which allows for hundreds of repositories with controlled access per project."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."

"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."

"The implementation is easy."

"The product is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."

"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."

More Git pros

Cons

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"In our company, we sometimes feel the need to have certain kinds of reports, but we never get those customized reports in Git's dashboard."

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

"The solution could improve by having more customization."

"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."

"There is nothing that could be improved at this time."

"I would rate the initial setup process a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most difficult and 10 being the easiest. The reason for this rating is that once there are conflicts, it takes a lot of effort to resolve them."

"The product needs to improve its UI."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"Git is completely free."

"We use the open-source version."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"The platform is less expensive."

"The tool is free."

"Git is an open-source software."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a version control system integrated directly in the cloud environment, similar to GitHub, GitLab, and other platforms. It offers every single benefit of using any other version co...

What needs improvement with Git?

Git works perfectly as is. The CLI works well with Git, and I don't have any recommendations about it.

What is your primary use case for Git?

My main use case for Git is for versioning and controlling and sharing my code. In a recent Laravel project, I used Git to manage versioning and collaboration by adopting a branching strategy. Spec...

What advice do you have for others considering Git?

The best advice that I can give is that you have to treat Git as a core part of the development process and not just as a storage tool. This way it leads to cleaner collaboration, safer experimenta...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 26% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 16% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 11% of the time

Liquibase vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 8% of the time

Cloudogu SCM- Manager vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub vs Git

Compared 9% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download Git product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that facilitates seamless integration with AWS services, offering scalable and secure private Git repositories. It enhances team collaboration with features like pull requests and IAM access control.

AWS CodeCommit effectively manages multiple repositories, supports versioning, and collaborates through pull requests and branch management. Its integration with AWS services like EC2, S3, and CodePipeline enhances development workflows. The platform also provides secure encryption, IAM-based access control, and customizable policies, ensuring smooth permission setup. Despite its integration benefits, areas like online repository forks, code reviewing, and file size limitations compared to GitHub necessitate enhancements. Organizations leverage CodeCommit for continuous integration and development, particularly when transitioning from older systems like Subversion.

What are the key features of AWS CodeCommit?

Seamless AWS Integration: Efficiently integrates with AWS services like CodePipeline and CodeBuild.
IAM-based Access Control: Provides secure access management with IAM rules.
Branch Management: Features for managing branches effectively.
Notification Rules: Enhances team collaboration with efficient notification setups.
Private Repositories: Offers secure, privately managed repositories.

What are the benefits of using AWS CodeCommit?

Easy Scalability: Adapts to growing development needs without complex configurations.
Enhanced Security: Encrypts data and allows for customizable security policies.
Improved Collaboration: Supports effective team collaboration with pull requests and notifications.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with AWS services to streamline deployment workflows.
Cost-Effective: Provides a cost-efficient solution for code management in the cloud.

In industries focused on cloud-based infrastructure, AWS CodeCommit supports private code storage and leverages AWS's secure environment. Teams manage and deploy applications efficiently, benefitting from seamless integration with AWS services. It is particularly beneficial for transitioning from traditional systems, aiding in modernizing and streamlining development processes.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Git offers branch management, version control, and automation to facilitate quick deployments and team collaboration. Supporting CLI and GUI, it integrates seamlessly with platforms like GitHub, providing a stable environment for code management and deployment.

Git's branch management, version control, and seamless integration with other platforms like GitHub make it a fundamental tool for software development. Its capabilities allow multiple users to work simultaneously, making it ideal for collaborative environments. Git is easy to learn and supports both command-line and graphical interfaces, providing flexibility in usage. It maintains a detailed log of modifications, assisting in efficient code tracking and troubleshooting. While its pricing model and merging capabilities could see improvements, as well as UI enhancements, Git still stands out for its reliability and performance.

What are Git's most valuable features?

Branch Management: Facilitates organized work on different features concurrently.
Version Control: Easily track changes and revert to previous versions.
Integration: Compatible with GitHub for enhanced collaboration.
CLI & GUI Support: Offers versatility in user preferences.
Comprehensive Log: Aids in detailed code tracking and issue resolution.

What benefits can users expect from Git?

Stability: Provides a reliable platform for development.
Performance: Efficiently handles multiple users and large projects.
Ecosystem: Extensive resources and community support.
Easy Learning Curve: User-friendly for new developers.

Git is employed extensively in software development for version control and collaborative coding. It's integral in web design and configuration management where maintaining multiple code versions offline is crucial. Organizations leverage Git for project and application development, benefiting IT departments and research activities with its robust repository management capabilities. Both cloud and on-premise deployments enhance productivity across industries.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

AWS CodeCommit vs. Git