Top 10 Trend Micro ServerProtect Alternatives

Name: Trend Micro ServerProtect
Brand: Trend Micro
Rating: 4.0 (18 reviews)

Vendor: Trend Micro

4.0 out of 5

18 reviews
87% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Trend Micro ServerProtect Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trend Micro ServerProtect based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Trend Micro ServerProtect surpasses its competitors by offering superior real-time malware scanning, centralized management, and seamless integration with other security solutions, ensuring robust protection and efficiency for servers of all sizes.

Trend Micro Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Trend Micro, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced endpoint protection with strong cloud-native capabilities and integration flexibility. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect emphasizes robust anti-malware and server-focused solutions, catering to diverse deployment needs, appealing to buyers preferring traditional infrastructure configurations.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a streamlined setup process, potentially reducing initial costs, while Trend Micro ServerProtect may involve more complex setup phases, influencing its setup cost structure.

View comparison

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a streamlined setup process, potentially reducing initial costs, while Trend Micro ServerProtect may involve more complex setup phases, influencing its setup cost structure.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Trend Micro ServerProtect is valued for its virus detection and real-time protection, with room for better reporting tools. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in threat protection and integration, though it seeks performance improvements. Trend Micro offers straightforward deployment; Microsoft allows flexible cloud options.

Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

Trend Micro ServerProtect has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more economical initial setup. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is often favored for its lower implementation expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers advanced threat detection, automation, and high integration, while Trend Micro ServerProtect focuses on comprehensive anti-malware protection and detailed reporting. In comparison, the latter prioritizes cost efficiency and ease of installation. Therefore, each serves different strategic needs for tech buyers.

Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

The setup cost for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is generally higher, while Trend Micro ServerProtect offers a lower initial setup cost. SentinelOne's higher pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set compared to Trend Micro's more basic offerings.

View comparison

Pricing

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security is praised for its user-friendly setup and virus protection, making it ideal for ease of use. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect offers comprehensive threat detection and network security, appealing to those needing advanced features despite higher pricing.

Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

HP Wolf Security has a minimal setup cost, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect involves a more substantial initial investment. HP Wolf Security is cost-effective for initial deployment in contrast to the higher upfront cost of Trend Micro ServerProtect.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR offers advanced threat detection with automated response features. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect provides comprehensive server protection with ease of use. Tech buyers might choose Cortex XDR for superior analytics, while Trend Micro ServerProtect appeals for its cost-effectiveness and focused server security.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro ServerProtect, which offers more affordable initial implementation. Trend Micro ServerProtect is more cost-effective from the outset while Cortex XDR requires a larger upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

3.9 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

3.9 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels with advanced threat protection and strong integration, appealing to users needing robust encryption and DLP. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect offers efficient server protection without individual VM installations and is cost-effective for smaller setups.

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is noted for its straightforward setup, while Trend Micro ServerProtect reviewers mention moderate setup costs. Trellix offers a more budget-friendly installation experience compared to Trend Micro's additional setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix is favored for its automation capabilities and competitive pricing. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect offers superior features like malware detection. BigFix users appreciate its straightforward deployment and support, while Trend Micro ServerProtect's extensive feature set delivers strong ROI despite its higher cost.

Download BigFix vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

BigFix has a relatively low initial setup cost, while Trend Micro ServerProtect requires a higher upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

BigFix has a relatively low initial setup cost, while Trend Micro ServerProtect requires a higher upfront investment.

Cynet

4.4 out of 5

Cynet

4.4 out of 5

Cynet excels in deployment ease and affordability with automated response capabilities. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect offers robust server threat protection and extensive features. Cynet's integration could improve, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect benefits from superior customer service despite needing a more user-friendly interface.

Download Cynet vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

Cynet has a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible to smaller organizations, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect requires a higher setup investment but offers more comprehensive security features for larger enterprises.

View comparison

Pricing

Malwarebytes Teams

4.0 out of 5

Malwarebytes Teams

4.0 out of 5

Malwarebytes Teams offers robust ransomware protection and remote management, ideal for small businesses seeking ease of use. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect provides advanced server environment security features like Virtual Patching, attracting enterprises needing comprehensive protection and real-time insights.

Download Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

Malwarebytes Teams offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect presents a more complex implementation process potentially leading to higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Malwarebytes Teams offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect presents a more complex implementation process potentially leading to higher initial expenses.

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

3.9 out of 5

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

3.9 out of 5

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is favored for its pricing and quick deployment. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect excels due to its comprehensive anti-malware protection and higher ROI. Cybereason needs better reporting tools, whereas Trend Micro could improve ease of use and patch management.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report

Pricing

The setup cost for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is significantly higher compared to Trend Micro ServerProtect. Trend Micro ServerProtect offers a more affordable setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 4 more products

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)