IBM Engineering Test Management and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) compete in the test management domain. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has the upper hand due to its robust feature set, offering valuable insights in performance testing.
Features: IBM Engineering Test Management provides collaborative capabilities, comprehensive test planning, and integration with automation tools. LoadRunner Professional stands out for its robust performance testing, diverse protocol support, and advanced load testing functionalities.
Room for Improvement: IBM Engineering Test Management could enhance its performance testing capabilities, expand integration with external measurement tools, and refine its test case automation features. LoadRunner Professional might better its setup complexity, improve documentation, and streamline its script customization process.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM offers easier deployment and strong integrated support, facilitating a seamless connection with other IBM products. LoadRunner demands a more complex setup but provides comprehensive documentation and solid technical support.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Engineering Test Management is more affordable upfront, delivering good ROI for smaller to mid-sized projects. LoadRunner Professional entails higher initial costs but promises greater returns in high-stakes environments where performance insights are crucial.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
IBM Engineering Test Management (ETM), formerly known as IBM Rational® Quality Manager (RQM), is a business-driven software quality environment designed for collaborative and customizable test planning, workflow control, tracking, and metrics reporting. When integrated with IBM DevOps Test Embedded (Test Embedded), ETM allows users to create test environments and scripts, deploy and run tests, and view HTML reports. This integration enables the creation of ETM test environments linked to Test Embedded target deployment ports, the deployment and execution of Test Embedded tests through the ETM interface, and the mapping of ETM test scripts to Test Embedded test suites. Additionally, users can import test suites as ETM test scripts, build new ETM test cases, and view test results as HTML reports within ETM. The integration requires the Test Embedded adapter service to be running on the user's computer.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.