OpenText Documentum Content Management provides centralized document management with strong security, advanced metadata management, and seamless integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, aiding businesses in overseeing content effectively.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Documentum Content Management | 9.0% |
| SharePoint | 13.4% |
| OpenText Content Management | 9.2% |
| Other | 68.4% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Enterprise Content Management | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Documentum Content Management vs IBM FileNet | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Documentum Content Management vs OpenText Content Management | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SharePoint | 3.9 | 13.4% | 79% | 164 interviewsAdd to research |
| Hyland OnBase | 3.9 | 6.2% | 100% | 13 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 178 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 94 |
| Large Enterprise | 490 |
OpenText Documentum Content Management is known for its strong integration capabilities, especially with systems such as SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle E-Business Suite, facilitating effective document management. Its strengths include advanced security features, comprehensive metadata management, and robust support for lifecycle and workflow management. The platform's scalability and business process automation capabilities support industries with large volumes of content. It is adaptable for various sectors, including healthcare, banking, insurance, and government, providing document storage, sharing, and collaboration functionalities. While the intuitive automation engine enhances workflows, users have noted that improvements are needed in UI design, performance, and integration with additional systems. Concerns about cloud transition security, high costs, outdated workflows, and complex metadata management indicate areas for development. Supports are sought for AI integrations, improved cloud functionality, and efficient documentation.
What are the key features of OpenText Documentum Content Management?Industries such as healthcare, banking, and government use OpenText Documentum Content Management for document-centric processes, ensuring regulatory compliance and facilitating collaboration. With Captiva enhancing OCR and batch scanning, it is crucial for managing high-quality documentation and compliance efforts across sectors.
OpenText Documentum Content Management was previously known as Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform.
Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Consultant In Risk Management and Performance Improvemenf at Deloitte Risk Advisory | 4.0 | I'm using OpenText Documentum to archive sales information and appreciate its strong integration capabilities with API, SAP, and Salesforce. However, the interface could be more intuitive as finding information can sometimes be challenging. |
| Technical Manager at Thames Water | 2.5 | I use Captiva and Webtop, integrated with OpenText Documentum, primarily for version control and managing 25 TB of data. While Documentum offers robust integration, high costs and frequent patching are significant drawbacks, pushing organizations towards more cost-effective solutions like SharePoint. |
| Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I use OpenText Documentum for managing the command life cycle and content management due to its user-friendly interface. However, the BPM aspect needs improvement, with more customization options for specific use cases. I haven't used other solutions for comparison. |
| Assistant Content Manager at a agriculture with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | We primarily use OpenText Documentum for centralized document storage, facing challenges with file format support, migration, and performance. Documentum's security is vital for our operations, but it struggles with efficiency and certain file types, necessitating manual conversions. |
| Technical Architect at Thermal Vision | 4.0 | We use Documentum for regulatory purposes and quality management, benefiting from its scalability for large content volumes and robust application development. However, performance issues with slow response times persist, impacting productivity despite hardware and software upgrades. |
| Director of Business Development at ProitswProitsw | 5.0 | We are developing solutions for national court systems with OpenText Documentum, involving thousands of officials and users. Its strong automation engine reduces development costs, but high licensing prices are a drawback. Despite considering alternatives, we have significant experience with OpenText. |
| Founder & Managing Director at 3 Cubed Business Consulting Pte Ltd | 4.5 | I began with Documentum as a developer and later as a consultant, finding it valuable for its stability, scalability, and crucial search feature. While intuitive UI improvements are needed, it outperforms alternatives like IBM FileNet and offers great regulatory compliance benefits. |
| Lead software engineer at Chevron | 4.0 | At Chevron, OpenText Documentum effectively manages extensive documentation for sales and field operations, integrating seamlessly with SAP for enhanced services. It excels in content management and records handling but requires improved documentation. Previously, FileNet and eRoom were used. |
