Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo

Top 10 OpenText Documentum Content Management Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5
Badge Leader
2,545 followers
Start review

Top OpenText Documentum Content Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText Documentum Content Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SharePoint, Box, and IBM FileNet. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. OpenText Documentum Content Management surpasses its competitors by providing robust document control, scalable file storage, and advanced compliance features, ensuring efficient content organization and retrieval that enhances productivity across enterprises.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
SharePoint
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
SharePoint
3.9 out of 5
SharePoint excels in collaborative features and Microsoft Office integration, appealing to those valuing streamlined workflows. In comparison, OpenText Documentum focuses on document security and compliance, suitable for industries requiring robust lifecycle management and extensive metadata capabilities, despite higher costs.
Download OpenText Documentum Content Management vs. SharePoint Report
SharePoint has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Documentum. OpenText Documentum’s setup is more extensive and costly, making SharePoint a more budget-friendly option for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
SharePoint has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Documentum. OpenText Documentum’s setup is more extensive and costly, making SharePoint a more budget-friendly option for businesses.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Box
4.2 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Box
4.2 out of 5
Box offers easy collaboration with seamless integrations and mobile access, along with robust security focused on enterprise-grade management. In comparison, OpenText Documentum excels in extensive document search capabilities and lifecycle management, designed for large-scale handling and complex regulatory compliance, attracting tech buyers handling intricate workflows.
Download Box vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
Box offers lower setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which involves a more extensive and costlier initialization process, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Box offers lower setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which involves a more extensive and costlier initialization process, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
IBM FileNet
4.1 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
IBM FileNet
4.1 out of 5
OpenText Documentum offers extensive integration, workflow support, and strong security. In comparison, IBM FileNet excels in scalability, robust document management, and case-oriented features, making it ideal for large-scale operations. Each provides noteworthy enterprise content management capabilities for distinct business needs.
Download IBM FileNet vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management typically incurs higher initial setup costs, while IBM FileNet offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management typically incurs higher initial setup costs, while IBM FileNet offers a more cost-effective setup option.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Adobe Experience Manager
4.0 out of 5
Adobe Experience Manager excels in integrating with Adobe Marketing Cloud, ideal for digital marketing initiatives. In comparison, OpenText Documentum supports document management with strong security. Adobe suits marketing-focused enterprises, while Documentum benefits document-centric organizations prioritizing security and compliance.
Download Adobe Experience Manager vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
Adobe Experience Manager often involves high initial setup costs, while OpenText Documentum Content Management provides a more budget-friendly setup. The distinction in expenditure highlights Adobe's premium positioning versus OpenText's affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe Experience Manager often involves high initial setup costs, while OpenText Documentum Content Management provides a more budget-friendly setup. The distinction in expenditure highlights Adobe's premium positioning versus OpenText's affordability.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Hyland OnBase
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Hyland OnBase
3.9 out of 5
Documentum offers advanced metadata management and customization, ideal for managing diverse content forms. In comparison, OnBase appeals with its codeless platform and intuitive interfaces, suitable for non-technical users seeking flexible, low-code environments. Both face challenges in pricing and require UI enhancements.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management often involves a significant initial setup cost, while Hyland OnBase is noted for its more economical setup expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management often involves a significant initial setup cost, while Hyland OnBase is noted for its more economical setup expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the solutions.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Alfresco
3.8 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Alfresco
3.8 out of 5
Alfresco attracts buyers with competitive pricing, seamless integrations, and a flexible cloud deployment ideal for smaller businesses. In comparison, OpenText Documentum appeals to enterprises with superior data governance, comprehensive compliance, and advanced automation, justifying higher costs for long-term value and scalability.
Download Alfresco vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
Alfresco features a flexible setup cost with scalable options, whereas OpenText Documentum Content Management tends to have a higher initial investment, reflecting the comprehensive services and features it offers.
View comparison
Pricing
Alfresco features a flexible setup cost with scalable options, whereas OpenText Documentum Content Management tends to have a higher initial investment, reflecting the comprehensive services and features it offers.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Oracle WebCenter
3.5 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Oracle WebCenter
3.5 out of 5
Oracle WebCenter is valued for extensive integration capabilities, enhancing enterprise content management through strong search and scalability. In comparison, OpenText Documentum excels with robust document management and security features, offering superior regulatory compliance tools justifying its higher cost with comprehensive advantages.
Download OpenText Documentum Content Management vs. Oracle WebCenter Report
Oracle WebCenter has a higher setup cost compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, making OpenText a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle WebCenter has a higher setup cost compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, making OpenText a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation expenses.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Newgen OmniDocs
4.3 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Newgen OmniDocs
4.3 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management is known for strong security and scalability, appealing to industries with strict compliance needs. In comparison, Newgen OmniDocs excels with automation and integration, offering quick deployment and competitive pricing, attracting businesses focused on rapid digital transformation.
Download Newgen OmniDocs vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management incurs higher setup costs compared to Newgen OmniDocs, highlighting a significant price difference. Newgen OmniDocs offers a more cost-effective setup option for organizations looking to implement content management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management incurs higher setup costs compared to Newgen OmniDocs, highlighting a significant price difference. Newgen OmniDocs offers a more cost-effective setup option for organizations looking to implement content management solutions.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
IBM ECM
4.0 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
IBM ECM
4.0 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management offers flexibility and cost efficiency, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, IBM ECM provides advanced analytics and integration for deeper insights, catering to enterprises seeking extensive functionality, despite a longer deployment cycle and higher initial setup costs.
Download IBM ECM vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management has higher setup costs than IBM ECM, highlighting significant differences in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management has higher setup costs than IBM ECM, highlighting significant differences in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Mobius Content Services Platform
3.3 out of 5
Mobius Content Services Platform offers competitive pricing and ease of deployment appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, OpenText Documentum, with its advanced features and robust security, suits organizations prioritizing compliance and long-term strategic value, despite a more complex deployment and higher initial costs.
Download Mobius Content Services Platform vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
Mobius Content Services Platform offers lower setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which requires higher initial investment. These differences highlight varied pricing structures between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Mobius Content Services Platform offers lower setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which requires higher initial investment. These differences highlight varied pricing structures between the two solutions.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Laserfiche
5.0 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Laserfiche
5.0 out of 5
Laserfiche is appreciated for intuitive workflow automation and integrated records management that streamline document processing. In comparison, OpenText Documentum excels in advanced compliance and security, ideal for enterprises needing strong data governance. Laserfiche’s cloud deployment offers flexibility, while OpenText’s feature-rich model serves complex needs.
Laserfiche offers a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, highlighting affordability as a key difference. On the other hand, OpenText Documentum's premium setup price reflects its broader enterprise capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Laserfiche offers a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, highlighting affordability as a key difference. On the other hand, OpenText Documentum's premium setup price reflects its broader enterprise capabilities.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Saperion
1.5 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Saperion
1.5 out of 5
Saperion is cost-effective with swift ROI, streamlined processes, and robust archiving. In comparison, OpenText Documentum Content Management excels with comprehensive features, flexible deployment options, and long-term value. Tech buyers may prefer Saperion for pricing or choose OpenText for extensive functionality and support.
Saperion has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which is considered more expensive but offers a comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Saperion has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which is considered more expensive but offers a comprehensive feature set.

Related categories

Enterprise Content Management
Web Content Management
Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals)