Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo

Top 10 OpenText Documentum Content Management Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top OpenText Documentum Content Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText Documentum Content Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SharePoint, Hyland OnBase, and Box. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. OpenText Documentum Content Management surpasses its competitors by providing robust document control, scalable file storage, and advanced compliance features, ensuring efficient content organization and retrieval that enhances productivity across enterprises.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
SharePoint
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
SharePoint
3.9 out of 5
SharePoint offers seamless Office 365 integration and collaboration, appealing to organizations seeking customization. In comparison, OpenText Documentum provides powerful lifecycle management and security, ideally suited for enterprises managing complex document environments. Each caters to distinctive needs, emphasizing their unique strengths in content management.
Download OpenText Documentum Content Management vs. SharePoint Report
SharePoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while OpenText Documentum Content Management involves a more complex and potentially higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SharePoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while OpenText Documentum Content Management involves a more complex and potentially higher initial investment.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Hyland OnBase
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Hyland OnBase
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Documentum appeals to tech buyers with its extensive lifecycle capabilities and integration with SAP and Salesforce. In comparison, Hyland OnBase offers flexibility and strong security, standing out with its low-code capabilities and integration with tools like Epic, attracting a diverse industry range.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management requires a significant investment in setup costs, while Hyland OnBase offers a more budget-friendly setup. This financial difference is a key consideration when comparing these content management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management requires a significant investment in setup costs, while Hyland OnBase offers a more budget-friendly setup. This financial difference is a key consideration when comparing these content management solutions.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Box
4.2 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Box
4.2 out of 5
Box is favored for easy deployment and integration, ideal for users seeking quick collaboration. In comparison, Documentum excels in robust document management and security for complex needs, attracting organizations requiring advanced management and extensive metadata support despite its intricate interface and higher cost.
Download Box vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
Box offers competitive setup costs, focusing on simplicity and quick deployment, while OpenText Documentum may require a higher investment with a more complex setup process, reflecting its focus on robust capabilities for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Box offers competitive setup costs, focusing on simplicity and quick deployment, while OpenText Documentum may require a higher investment with a more complex setup process, reflecting its focus on robust capabilities for larger enterprises.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Alfresco
3.8 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Alfresco
3.8 out of 5
Alfresco, with its open-source flexibility and user-friendly tools, suits those seeking budget-friendly options. In comparison, OpenText Documentum appeals to those needing comprehensive features and industry-specific solutions, despite a more complex deployment and higher initial costs, offering long-term value in demanding environments.
Download Alfresco vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
Alfresco generally incurs lower setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum, making it a cost-effective option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Alfresco generally incurs lower setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum, making it a cost-effective option for initial deployment.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Adobe Experience Manager
4.1 out of 5
Adobe Experience Manager integrates with Adobe Marketing Cloud for digital marketing, ideal for dynamic content. In comparison, OpenText Documentum excels in document lifecycle and secure handling for enterprises. Tech buyers choose based on Adobe's marketing focus or Documentum's document management strengths.
Download Adobe Experience Manager vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
Adobe Experience Manager has higher setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe Experience Manager has higher setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
IBM FileNet
4.1 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
IBM FileNet
4.1 out of 5
OpenText Documentum excels in lifecycle management, making it ideal for industries needing regulatory compliance. In comparison, IBM FileNet is favored for scalability and robust document management, suitable for large enterprises handling high content volumes with complex workflows.
Download IBM FileNet vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management typically incurs higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive features, while IBM FileNet offers a more cost-effective setup with flexible pricing options.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management typically incurs higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive features, while IBM FileNet offers a more cost-effective setup with flexible pricing options.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Oracle WebCenter
3.5 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Oracle WebCenter
3.5 out of 5
Oracle WebCenter benefits from favorable pricing, support outcomes, and seamless integration. In comparison, OpenText Documentum Content Management excels with its comprehensive features, emphasizing content lifecycle management, compliance, and security, making it suitable for complex needs despite higher costs.
Download OpenText Documentum Content Management vs. Oracle WebCenter Report
Oracle WebCenter setup costs are typically higher than OpenText Documentum, which offers more competitive pricing. This can make Documentum more accessible for organizations with budget constraints compared to Oracle's more substantial initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle WebCenter setup costs are typically higher than OpenText Documentum, which offers more competitive pricing. This can make Documentum more accessible for organizations with budget constraints compared to Oracle's more substantial initial investment requirements.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Newgen OmniDocs
4.3 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Newgen OmniDocs
4.3 out of 5
OpenText Documentum is ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive document management and long-term scalability. In comparison, Newgen OmniDocs appeals to those seeking intuitive design and strong collaboration tools. While OpenText requires technical expertise, Newgen offers simpler deployment and cost-effective entry.
Download Newgen OmniDocs vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management requires a substantial initial setup cost, while Newgen OmniDocs offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management requires a substantial initial setup cost, while Newgen OmniDocs offers a more affordable setup.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
IBM ECM
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
IBM ECM
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Documentum offers favorable pricing and compliance-focused solutions, appealing to enterprises seeking cost-effective and easy deployment. In comparison, IBM ECM delivers advanced integration and scalability, providing a comprehensive solution for organizations prioritizing extensive features and long-term value.
Download IBM ECM vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management involves higher setup costs, while IBM ECM offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting significant differences in their financial commitments.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management involves higher setup costs, while IBM ECM offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting significant differences in their financial commitments.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Laserfiche
5.0 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Laserfiche
5.0 out of 5
Laserfiche attracts tech buyers with its competitive pricing and user-friendly interface. In comparison, OpenText Documentum appeals with its extensive features and enterprise-level management, ideal for organizations requiring complex regulatory compliance and customization, despite a more demanding deployment process and higher initial costs.
Laserfiche setup cost is competitively priced, while OpenText Documentum Content Management tends to have higher setup expenses due to its complex features.
View comparison
Pricing
Laserfiche setup cost is competitively priced, while OpenText Documentum Content Management tends to have higher setup expenses due to its complex features.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Mobius Content Services Platform
3.3 out of 5
Mobius is favored for its flexible architecture and scalability, enhancing integration with existing systems. In comparison, OpenText is selected for comprehensive document management and advanced security. Mobius offers simplified deployment and competitive pricing, while OpenText provides deep integration for complex enterprise requirements.
Download Mobius Content Services Platform vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
Mobius Content Services Platform has comparatively lower setup costs, whereas OpenText Documentum Content Management requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Mobius Content Services Platform has comparatively lower setup costs, whereas OpenText Documentum Content Management requires a higher initial investment.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management
4.3 out of 5
OpenText Documentum excels in compliance management, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing regulatory adherence. In comparison, SAP Extended Enterprise offers advanced collaboration and mobile access features, appealing to those seeking superior connectivity. Documentum's competitive pricing attracts budget-focused buyers, while SAP provides long-term value with significant ROI.
Download OpenText Documentum Content Management vs. SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management has higher setup costs compared to SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management, highlighting a significant contrast in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management has higher setup costs compared to SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management, highlighting a significant contrast in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Saperion
1.5 out of 5
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Saperion
1.5 out of 5
Saperion excels in automating business processes and easy integration, appealing to smaller enterprises with budget constraints. In comparison, OpenText Documentum Content Management delivers robust content handling and scalability, making it ideal for larger enterprises prioritizing extensive functionality and long-term ROI.
Saperion typically incurs lower setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum, which tends to require higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Saperion typically incurs lower setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum, which tends to require higher initial investment.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Tietoevry Public 360
1 out of 5
Tietoevry Public 360 offers cost-effective solutions with user-friendly navigation, attracting buyers seeking efficient document collaboration. In comparison, OpenText Documentum Content Management provides robust features and extensive integration, appealing to those needing advanced search and compliance management in complex, large-scale environments.
Tietoevry Public 360 offers a competitive setup cost, while OpenText Documentum Content Management has a higher initial investment. The pricing difference may influence potential buyers when considering budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Tietoevry Public 360 offers a competitive setup cost, while OpenText Documentum Content Management has a higher initial investment. The pricing difference may influence potential buyers when considering budget constraints.
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management Logo
Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform
1 out of 5
Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform excels in integration and creative suite compatibility, ideal for multimedia projects. In comparison, OpenText Documentum offers robust security and compliance, appealing to industries with stringent governance needs, making each distinct for different enterprise content management priorities.
Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform has higher setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which offers more cost-effective initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform has higher setup costs compared to OpenText Documentum Content Management, which offers more cost-effective initial expenses.

Related categories

Enterprise Content Management
Web Content Management
Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals)