Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Content Management Logo

OpenText Content Management pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5
Badge Leader
1,793 followers
Start review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Content Management offers robust integration capabilities with other applications such as SAP, SuccessFactors, and Salesforce, allowing users to manage documents seamlessly across platforms.
Scalability and flexibility are notable strengths, enabling horizontal and vertical extension to accommodate growing needs.
Core Share feature facilitates secure document sharing with external parties like auditors or vendors without granting access to the entire system.
Permissions, security models, and metadata tagging are significant features that enhance document categorization and information management within OpenText Content Management.
Version control and business workspace integration with SAP and OpenText provide precise control over document access and organization.

CONS

Initially, there can be stability issues influenced by the system usage, document quantity, and peak hour load.
Pricing and performance require improvement, which are crucial factors.
Support response times are ineffective, and staff may lack adequate knowledge.
The annotation tool is challenging compared to other tools like Hyland OnBase.
Issues with scalability have been noted, impacting the production environment.
 

OpenText Content Management Pros review quotes

reviewer2297793 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help.
reviewer2297748 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
Being able to search is valuable. Its search is pretty powerful. We are able to search for specific text, and it points us to the document that has that text. That is pretty powerful.
RM
Oct 20, 2023
Retention is useful. I have been pleased with the search functionality and the extensibility for tying it into integrations with other systems and building workflows on top of it.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Content Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2297802 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
WebReports has a lot of capabilities that offer good opportunities to customize the applications the way we want to.
Mukesh Giri - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 10, 2024
The engineering document management system is one of the most valuable features.
Kathiravan Rajendran - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
Smart Viewing videos are most valuable for the end users. The end users like the look and feel of Smart View. It's similar to SharePoint, with the latest HTML5 features, filters, and everything. It's like online shopping.
JL
Oct 20, 2023
We use Core Share to share documents with external auditors or with vendors, and that prevents them from being able to get into the whole system. It is useful.
Nagaraj Appavoo - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document.
Jaclyn Turner - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
Being able to tag metadata on documents and being able to have different workspaces in there for our documents is valuable. We do loan documents, and different types of documents have different types of retentions. We are able to categorize based on that, and we are able to do tag searching to find what we are looking for.
AC
Oct 4, 2020
It's a very good solution.
 

OpenText Content Management Cons review quotes

reviewer2297793 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product.
reviewer2297748 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
The annotation tool needs improvement. In other tools, such as Hyland OnBase, you can easily do annotation. You can easily merge documents. You can easily compare documents, whereas with OpenText, it seems to be a challenge.
RM
Oct 20, 2023
I have not used it enough to start running into issues. Some of my technical guys could name a couple of things, but in terms of support, we did have challenges getting good responses from them.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Content Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2297802 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
The initial setup can get really complicated, and it takes time.
Mukesh Giri - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 10, 2024
More out-of-the-box automation features should be added to OpenText Extended ECM.
Kathiravan Rajendran - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
We had some issues with scalability in the production. So, I would rate it a five out of ten.
JL
Oct 20, 2023
There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better.
Nagaraj Appavoo - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
The solution's performance, stability, and consistency could be improved.
Jaclyn Turner - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
A dashboard with information would be nice to see.
AC
Oct 4, 2020
Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important.