We are looking for BPM or Business Process Design software to connect the top layer of Enterprise Architecture (EA) to processes

Hi colleagues,

We're looking for BPM/BPD/etc. software that can connect the top layer of Enterprise Architecture (EA) to our processes. 

Do you have any recommendations? Is it achievable?


User at avin
  • 5
  • 136
PeerSpot user
5 Answers
President at CloseReach Ltd.
Top 5
Aug 9, 2022


There are several ways you can accomplish this using QualiWare's EA and modeling solution. You can take your top layer of EA and visualize that in QualiWare linking elements at that level to processes and workflows using BPMN or simpler more business friendly process/workflow models. Alternately you could use ArchiMate in QualiWare to model most of your EA and decompose/link to BPMN models to provide input to process engines... QualiWare enables all of this out-of-the box and makes it easy to present content in multiple languages if you are a multi-national... Also can help your organization deal with quality, regulatory and policy compliance in a structured fashion linked to your EA.

QualiWare's web publishing of EA and process content makes it easy to tailor the views that various users see/need to do their jobs... we have been doing this type of work for over 12 years with the Canadian Federal government. Feel free to reach out to discuss further - have some real examples and best practices that we could share.


Search for a product comparison in Business Process Design
CGL at Dynamus Clube
Real User
Aug 18, 2022


You may have a look at Camunda.

The Process Expert at Airbus Group
Real User
Aug 10, 2022

ADONIS for top end stuff. https://www.boc-group.com/en/a...

Architect for those on a budget:

Gartner likes BizzDesign
: https://bizzdesign.com/ 

help organisations get Business
Architecture and tooling in place. I am "The Process Expert":
https://theprocess.expert. Please contact me if
I can be of assistance.

IanRamsay - PeerSpot reviewer
Director Business Consulting at Cognizant
Real User
Aug 8, 2022

I think you may need to be a bit more explicit as too “what” is the “top layer” and “how” do you wish to “connect” and “why”.

Anything is possible from a modelling point of view, less so if you plan to generate the processes from the architecture.  Just about every relationship between architectural components is a “many-to-many” relationship, so things can get quite complex quite quickly.

Managing Director at Optus
Top 5
Aug 4, 2022

@Zooo Sasasa ​

Signavio, ARIS, and GBTEC have ArchiMate modules for modeling Enterprise Architecture (EA) and are great potential candidates.

Learn what your peers think about Bizagi. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2023.
735,432 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Linda NamayanjaPMP,CBPA,ITIL - PeerSpot reviewer
Supervisor Business Analysis-Process Management at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 23, 2022
Hello community members, At the moment, I'm tasked to develop the enterprise architecture of the organization and I have a couple of questions below: What capability models/mapping (business architecture) do you know/exist and how do they eventually connect to the application, data, and infrastructure architecture?  What tools and/or templates can I use? Thanks in advance for your help!
2 out of 4 answers
Shibu Babuchandran - PeerSpot reviewer
Regional Manager/ Service Delivery Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Aug 20, 2022
Hi @Linda NamayanjaPMP,CBPA,ITIL ​, Choosing the right EAM tools involves various steps that are aimed to ensure smooth integration and maximum benefits. Some points collected with the help of my peers may be of help to you. Understanding the benefits of EAM tools: Through advanced and integrated features, EAM tools help you to uncover and avoid unmanaged IT applications that would otherwise increase your cloud spend and create potential security risks for sensitive data. Once you understand the benefits that modern EAM tools have to offer, you can focus on finding the right solution for you and your EA strategy. Choosing an EAM tool based on your EA program: When opting for an EAM tool, make sure that it helps you achieve your business and IT goals. These could be application portfolio management, technology risk management, post-merger IT integration, or an overall business transformation. Assessing needs of stakeholders: Since you don't want to create another IT silo, you should ask yourself what informational needs each stakeholder has and how EA can bridge knowledge gaps. Ideally, the tool will foster cross-department collaboration and optimize workflows. Stakeholders should be able to access data and drive their own analysis. On top of that, QA mechanisms will improve overall data quality. Reviewing the data model of prospective EAM tools: Make sure to evaluate the data model of your prospective EAM tools. You should be able to align it with your current terminology and attributes and assign authorization roles with ease. Measuring the onboarding process against goals: Once you have settled on an EAM solution that fulfills your current and foreseeable future needs, you can start with the onboarding process. It’s important to set initial goals and keep measuring the process as you go. From data mapping, imports, workspace reviews, and success KPIs – ideally, the tools allow you to use the desired form of measuring your onboarding success and keep track of the work in progress. Some products suggested by my peers are below BiZZdesign Enterprise Studio Avolution Abacus Software AG Alfabet Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Hope the above will help you choose the right solution for your requirement.
@Linda NamayanjaPMP,CBPA,ITIL, ​ check this out: https://resources.bizzdesign.c...
Ian Ramsay - PeerSpot reviewer
Director Business Consulting at Cognizant
Apr 20, 2022
Hi community, Given that business process design is now more than ever important in defining business operations (and ranging from fine-grained automation detail to high-level business compliance and staff training) I’m interested in hearing what others think needs to be improved or evolved in a modern process description.   How can we be more explicit in Process Definition yet also more conc...
2 out of 4 answers
Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Apr 18, 2022
Hi @Tracy Hautenen Kriel, @Dawn McClure, @MichaelSukachev, @Shankar HN ​and @Santosh Kurakula, Can you please share your professional thoughts with your peer, @Ian Ramsay? Thanks!​​
Software Developer at RowdenSoftwareSolutions Ltd.
Apr 19, 2022
I favour a top-down approach to any specification. 1. I often use a UML activity diagram for this type of 'complexity reduction analysis' because it is easy to model the complexity hierarchically (drill down if interested)  2. Start with broadstrokes top-level activities in client speak. 3. If the activity deed elaboration - create a child diagram from it. 4. Do that recursively as required * Essentially diagrams should not be overly complex (ideally printable on A4). * This aids cognition by interested parties of diverse backgrounds and expertise. However, where complexity does need elaboration then use the hierarchical structure alluded to above (win-win). If I knew how to share an image I would post it here. The tool I use is not specific to Business Process - and indeed it does have specific BPMN and other business Process diagram capabilities. Experts in this field will have their own preferences. I like the basic UML Activity diagram because it is powerful and simple to use. The tool I am using here is Enterprise Architect by Sparx - an affordable but powerful Analysis/design/code generation tool that does so much more. It has loads of diagrams and model types. Hope that helps? Terry
Senior Project Management Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
ExpertTop 10
Download Free Report
Download our free Bizagi Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2023.
735,432 professionals have used our research since 2012.