ARIS BPA vs No Magic MagicDraw comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Software AG and Dassault Systèmes are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Software AG is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8, while Dassault Systèmes is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. Software AG holds a 7.0% mindshare in BPD, compared to Dassault Systèmes’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Dassault Systèmes users who would recommend it.

ARIS BPA

Read 69 ARIS BPA reviews

9,274 Views
5,379 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

No Magic MagicDraw

Read 19 No Magic MagicDraw reviews

2,772 Views
2,578 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ARIS BPA

No Magic MagicDraw

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

ARIS BPA and MagicDraw both compete in the process modeling and analysis category, each with distinct strengths. ARIS BPA appears stronger for large enterprises with its integrated end-to-end business process modeling features, whereas MagicDraw excels in the SysML environment due to its robust UML and BPMN integration capabilities.

Features: ARIS BPA offers flexible use of notations such as EPC and BPMN, robust enterprise architecture analysis, and powerful integration capabilities. MagicDraw supports integrated modeling with BPMN and UML, provides strong data modeling capabilities through its versatile interface, and continuously evolves to support advanced design needs.

Room for Improvement: ARIS BPA users express a need for improved automation in process execution, better third-party integration, and a more accessible system for technical execution. MagicDraw could benefit from a better user interface, simpler collaboration for large-scale models, and more affordable licensing options for smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ARIS BPA offers flexible deployment across hybrid, cloud, and on-premises environments, though user feedback on customer service is mixed. MagicDraw is mainly deployed on-premises but receives positive reviews for its strong technical support, despite needing improved administration documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Both ARIS BPA and MagicDraw have premium pricing structures. ARIS BPA's diverse licensing models present cost management challenges but are seen as valuable investments due to comprehensive features. MagicDraw's pricing is high for smaller companies but offers trial licenses and both tools deliver substantial ROI tailored to organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed ARIS BPA vs. No Magic MagicDraw Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ARIS BPA vs. No Magic MagicDraw

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ARIS BPA

Ranking in Business Process Design

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (13th)

No Magic MagicDraw

Ranking in Business Process Design

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of ARIS BPA is 7.0%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw is 2.4%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ARIS BPA	7.0%
No Magic MagicDraw	2.4%
Other	90.6%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

BeenishMustafa

Consultant at KAFD DMC

Has improved process modeling and analysis while supporting integration with organizational data

The process design in ARIS BPA does help with our operational efficiency. What we are doing is object library management for various kinds of objects that we are using in ARIS BPA during our process modeling. We are using that to do a lot of analysis on how many times a system is being used in how many processes, who are the major stakeholders, and if we enhance one system, how is it going to impact other processes and integrated processes. This is helping us a lot. Everything related to ARIS BPA is helping us with regards to enhanced processes, strengthened controls, identifying risks, assessing process capabilities, and identifying where the gaps are and what kinds of activities within the processes are automated and manual. We are doing a lot of things with regards to the processes as it is at our heart. Processes are one thing and then we have different kinds of things which are related to it, such as SLAs, guidelines, and policy. We are identifying areas of improvement in other documents as well.

Read full review

reviewer2080611

System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Ease of use and real-time collaboration empower effective teamwork and streamlined development

For CAMEO, it's not only the ease of use, it's versatility, its communicability, but Rhapsody is the worst tool I've ever used. It is very difficult, not user-friendly, and very expensive. It works only with its IBM counterparts. SPARX Enterprise Architecture is very easy to use, but it's limited. It gives you an idea of how your model is developing, so this feature helps maintain integrity or correctness of system models. It's really a good feature to have. You've got to have the simulation toolkit installed to be able to do that, and that works really well. The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that. I would prefer that it come with the simulation toolkit.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is user-friendly and easy to expose."

"Overall BPM modeling functionality is very good."

"The stability of the ARIS BPM platform is quite good. The nice thing about it is the central database, where we can use all of our data. We can even manage users."

"Everything related to ARIS BPA is helping us with regards to enhanced processes, strengthened controls, identifying risks, assessing process capabilities, and identifying where the gaps are and what kinds of activities within the processes are automated and manual."

"ARIS is an important tool for my organization."

"The most valuable features are business process modeling and reporting."

"you want to do modeling with the old notation form, ours was EPC, you can use the same object in the BPMN because the database is built in a way that you can use both things. So you only have to define it once, and if the notation form is BPMN and those kind of activities, you can use the same EPCs, so there is a connection between them."

"There is a module designer, that one is very powerful and it creates very good reports."

More ARIS BPA pros

"I alone can maintain all architecture documentation for a larger project as well as for one or two selected systems."

"My advice to anybody who is designing complex projects, like defense projects or space projects, is that they have to use this program or one like it."

"When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool; you can use it for business architecture design, for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise, for managing new product development from cradle to grave, and it enables you to generate a digital model of your product or service solution that can be run through simulations and tested before you spend a single penny on bending metal or configuring a new ERP software application, resulting in massive cost savings."

"The most valuable features with No Magic MagicDraw are its ease of use; you can put this in front of a 12-year-old and they would know what to do right away."

"I would rate MagicDraw a nine out of ten because of the price. Enterprise Architect has a lot of bugs and MagicDraw is a lot more accurate and flexible. It's a level better."

"I like the traceability feature. Whoever is working with the product would be sure of the things that could be affected if they decided to affect one of the other companies. For example, let's say that an engineer starts a new project optimization problem by adjusting the thickness of metal sheets. However, the engineers only see a reduced number of affections, but when we use the requirement traceability, they can see the whole picture. That's the main aspect that we were promoting with this tool."

"Offers good standards compliance and is user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature is the amount of flexibility that one has to model, which is great for an individual."

More No Magic MagicDraw pros

Cons

"It takes a long time for a new user to start working with ARIS, so perhaps it could be more user-friendly in terms of the complicated construction conventions that it uses."

"Aris BPA is very complex and very difficult to start learning and onboarding."

"One issue related to ARIS BPA is its integration with AI; it has AI features for cloud solutions, yet many in the government sector in Kuwait do not view the cloud as viable."

"We do experience a lot of glitches with ARIS BPA."

"Newer versions (9.x) are technically more difficult to maintain."

"I had this decentralization mission where I had some friendly fights with the consultants of Software AG."

"Customer service is poor to acceptable depending on issue, but mostly poor."

"The user experience's usability (in general) should be improved as the tool is updated."

More ARIS BPA cons

"They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect."

"The cost of upgrading the product should be lower."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

"They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect. MagicDraw is stuck at C++03 standards, whereas most C++ programs today want to use the latest definition of the C++ standards. We were at C++11, and we wanted to do code engineering with C++11 or 17, but they didn't support it. That pushed us into a different tool, which is Sparx Enterprise Architect."

"It would be better if the User Interface were updated. At the moment, it's a classic environment. It reminds me of the old Windows interface, for example, Windows 95. It would be better to make it more user-friendly. It would also be better if it could integrate with SAP solutions. It isn't easy to find experts in the field. It's hard to find people around the globe that have the necessary skills and expertise to manage this solution. For example, in our case, we needed someone with refrigeration knowledge that also knew how to use the tool, and that was a challenge. We also had issues relating to erasing. Sometimes, it kept it in the background and didn't erase it at all. We had to review the entire list to ensure that the item was deleted."

"There could be a trial version for students."

"It's very focused on specific modern languages and it doesn't do necessarily general systems software engineering with diagrams. They should expand the diagram types for the languages."

"I would like to see the ability to deploy live business process models and capture real-time data (without the need for another product tool) so you don't have to be dependent on other products for this functionality."

More No Magic MagicDraw cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"ARIS has different licensing mechanisms for different modules, but they are perpetual licenses. So you pay once."

"Their license model is really difficult to understand, and licenses are quite expensive."

"It is well worth the investment in the enterprise."

"Prices are high. However, they are worth it if the organization utilizes the tool to its full potential."

"The product is expensive."

"ARIS BPA is too costly from a licensing perspective."

More ARIS BPA pricing and cost advice

"I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It is an expensive product compared to software for model-based system engineering."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's expensive."

"I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

"In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades."

"The price of No Magic MagicDraw could improve. The price of the solution is too expensive for smaller-sized companies. There should be a better pricing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ARIS BPA?

It is a bit expensive regarding ARIS BPA. However, ARIS BPA does save a lot of effort because this is one tool which can be used for multiple purposes and the viewers have the capability to perform...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ARIS BPA?

We are not using any what-if scenario features in ARIS BPA. Currently, we are not using the performance monitoring and compliance checks features in ARIS BPA. We have plans to use them, but current...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ARIS BPA?

ARIS BPA is being used for process modeling, and we are planning to upgrade and enhance it for process mining and other purposes. We are using it for everything. Currently, we are doing HRMS integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for No Magic MagicDraw?

Maybe the price is a little bit high for a small company to acquire this tool. However, they offer trial versions and trial licenses for members of INCOSE.

See all answers

What needs improvement with No Magic MagicDraw?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for No Magic MagicDraw?

I deal with DOD lifecycle acquisition sorts of things as some of the main use cases currently, and I expect to continue using it for more than 25 years.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ARIS BPA

Compared 7% of the time

Camunda vs ARIS BPA

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs ARIS BPA

Compared 5% of the time

Aurea CX Process vs ARIS BPA

Compared 4% of the time

ADONIS vs ARIS BPA

Compared 4% of the time

More ARIS BPA Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 17% of the time

Visio vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 12% of the time

Visual Paradigm vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 8% of the time

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

Aurea CX Process vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 4% of the time

More No Magic MagicDraw Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ARIS BPA

September 2026

Download ARIS BPA product report

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw

September 2026

Download No Magic MagicDraw product report

Also Known As

ARIS, ARIS BPM

MagicDraw

Overview

ARIS BPA is a sophisticated tool for business process analysis and modeling, featuring robust capabilities in integration, reporting, and collaboration. It bridges strategy and execution, leveraging a centralized repository for enhanced governance and efficiency.

ARIS BPA provides a comprehensive platform for modeling and analyzing business processes. It includes features like SAP integration, semantic checks, and a unified repository that supports cross-functional collaboration. Despite having a high cost compared to competitors, ARIS BPA supports frameworks like CMMI and EFQM and is used for process improvement, enterprise architecture modeling, and digital management. Its flexibility and powerful API allow for diverse reporting and data integration, making it a key tool for bridging strategies with execution in complex environments. It requires improvements in interface design, scripting, and simplification of reporting capabilities, with training resources needed to address complexity.

What are the most important features of ARIS BPA?

Comprehensive Process Modeling: Enables detailed design and analysis of business processes.
Robust Integration: Provides integration capabilities with platforms like SAP.
Centralized Repository: Facilitates cross-functional collaboration and documentation.
Simulation and Reporting: Offers simulation features and diverse reporting capabilities.
Customization and API: Features customizable options and a powerful API for enhanced functionality.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Bridges strategic objectives with operational execution.
Improved Visibility: Offers better governance and process transparency.
Collaboration Support: Centralized repository aids cross-team collaboration.
Integration Capability: Strong integration with existing systems to streamline workflows.
Flexibility: Adaptable to meet different operational requirements and needs.

In industries such as manufacturing, finance, and healthcare, companies utilize ARIS BPA for optimizing business processes, managing application landscapes, and ensuring compliance. It is a preferred tool for enterprise architecture modeling and process mining, supporting organizations in driving process efficiencies and maintaining high standards through frameworks like CMMI and EFQM. These capabilities allow for effective digital management and automation, positioning ARIS BPA as a valuable asset in transforming operational processes.

Software AG

No Magic MagicDraw is a powerful modeling tool recognized for its flexibility and integration capabilities, especially suited for enterprise modeling and systems engineering. Featuring a user-friendly interface, it supports diverse modeling architectures with tools for testing and simulation.

Renowned for its compliance with OMG standards, No Magic MagicDraw excels in offering comprehensive modeling options that support model-based systems engineering. Its rich feature set enables digital model creation aimed at testing and simulation, backed by a strong suite of integration tools. The tool facilitates program management integration with systems engineering, making it suitable for complex enterprise projects. However, suggestions for improvement include a redesign for a more intuitive interface and enhanced documentation. Licensing costs are higher compared to competitors, and integration requests include compatibility with SAP and modern C++ standards.

What are the most important features of No Magic MagicDraw?

Flexibility: Adapts to different modeling needs and architectures with ease.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies access and usage for modeling tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Doors.
Standard Compliance: Aligns with OMG standards.
Traceability: Maintains visibility across project changes.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from No Magic MagicDraw?

Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent technical support.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates model-driven documentation and teamwork.
Strategic Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time in business transformation projects.

No Magic MagicDraw is widely deployed for tasks including business transformation, system architecture modeling, and supporting defense programs, proving invaluable in enterprise and system modeling. It aids in strategy integration, process design, and offers extensive features like simulations and lifecycle engineering.

Dassault Systèmes

Sample Customers

Tesco, Weifu, Airbus, Siemens, Proximus, Alicorp, Sekerbank, Bancor, Philips,Sky, Emirates NBD, Dubai Municipality, Suva, U.S. Army, Australia Post, Westfalen Weser Energie - ARIS serves customers across all industries and of every size worldwide. Companies trust ARIS as the market leader for process excellence with more than 30 years of experience in the market, 10 million users worldwide, from 1 user companies to the Fortune 500.

Northrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., Sodifrance

Buyer's Guide

ARIS BPA vs. No Magic MagicDraw

September 2026

Free Report: ARIS BPA vs. No Magic MagicDraw

Find out what your peers are saying about ARIS BPA vs. No Magic MagicDraw and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ARIS BPA vs. No Magic MagicDraw report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.