IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

SECDO Platform vs Splunk Phantom comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Palo Alto Networks Logo
821 views|497 comparisons
Splunk Logo
9,074 views|5,965 comparisons
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."

More SECDO Platform Pros →

"I have found all the security automation platform features of Splunk Phantom to be good. The Automation playbook development is highly useful.""The automation part of the product is great.""I like the integration capabilities of Phantom. It has a lot of integrations with other products. Its searching methodologies are also good. It is also easy to understand and easy to create playbooks.""So far, the interface is very easy to use.""The most valuable features of Splunk Phantom are the easy integration with other solutions, including other Splunk solutions. The most important playbooks we need on a market come already on the Frontend. However, nowadays, Splunk changed its name, it's not Frontend anymore, it's Splunk Store. This is a very strong point.""The most valuable feature of Splunk Phantom that stands out is it has a great SOAR. The automation and orchestration module is highly mature. A lot of use cases are on user entity and behavioral analytics (UEBA), which is artificial intelligence and machine learning-based (AIML).""The customization continues to be excellent.""I'm just a beginner on the solution and it's pretty easy for me to use."

More Splunk Phantom Pros →

Cons
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."

More SECDO Platform Cons →

"I haven't used it fully, but based on my usage, I could not find simulation tools and features. It currently lacks simulation features, which are important for me for creating a playbook. It is also very expensive for my region.""The scalability could be better.""We've had trouble implementing the solution with Microsoft products. There seems to be an integration gap.""The Splunk Phantom platform was not designed specifically for case management which is why this area needs improvement.""Splunk Phantom can improve IoT/OT security-related case studies or your use cases. Their integration with identity and access management (IAM) solutions is a bit shaky. They don't have good integration with a lot of IAM solutions. They do have good capability in terms of user access management internally, but even with privileged user access, they have a good module. However, if they have to integrate with solutions, such as CyberArk or IBM IAM solutions they are lacking, the visibility of user access is not that much.""It would be ideal if we could automate processes even more.""Splunk Phantom has room to improve its offering for small-sized customers. The price is not fair for smaller-sized customers.""In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."

More Splunk Phantom Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."
  • "The price of Splunk Phantom is reasonable."
  • "Splunk Phantom follows very flat pricing and most of the time it's very high when compared to the other competitors. They can improve their pricing. The licensing model is a subscription and is consumption-based."
  • "The price of Splunk Phantom is based on the number of people using it. Once you increase the users, the prices go goes up. The customer receives a license for the user that is going to operate it in their environment."
  • More Splunk Phantom Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.
    610,518 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive.
    Top Answer:I do not deal directly with the pricing information. From what I've heard, smaller companies are able to purchase the product without blowing their budget. In comparison, with solutions such as Splunk… more »
    Top Answer:Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it. Users must avoid buying it just for the brand name. they… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Splunk Phantom that stands out is it has a great SOAR. The automation and orchestration module is highly mature. A lot of use cases are on user entity and behavioral… more »
    Top Answer:Splunk Phantom follows very flat pricing and most of the time it's very high when compared to the other competitors. They can improve their pricing. The licensing model is a subscription and is… more »
    Top Answer:Splunk Phantom can improve IoT/OT security-related case studies or your use cases. Their integration with identity and access management (IAM) solutions is a bit shaky. They don't have good… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    821
    Comparisons
    497
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    790
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    9,074
    Comparisons
    5,965
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    502
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Phantom
    Learn More
    Overview

    SECDO enables security teams to identify and remediate incidents fast. Using thread-level endpoint monitoring and causality analytics, SECDO provides visibility into every endpoint along with the context necessary for understanding whether a suspicious activity is a genuine threat. Unique deception techniques force threats like ransomware out into the open early, and trigger automated containment and remediation.

    SECDO provides the most intuitive investigation experience available so you can quickly unravel complex incidents across the organization.  You can investigate incidents detected by SECDO as well as alerts from the SIEM. SECDO visualizes the attack chain so you immediately understand the “who, what, where, when and how” behind the incident. Then, based on an analysis of exactly how endpoints were compromised, SECDO surgically remediates the incident with minimum user impact.

    Phantom enables teams to work smarter by executing automated actions across their security infrastructure in seconds, versus hours or more if performed manually. Teams can codify workflows into Phantom’s automated playbooks using the visual editor (no coding required) or the integrated Python development environment. By offloading these repetitive tasks, teams can focus their attention on making the most mission-critical decisions.
    Orchestration
    Phantom is the connective tissue that lets existing security tools work better together. By connecting and coordinating complex workflows across the SOC’s team and tools, Phantom ensures that each part of the SOC’s layered defense is actively participating in a unified defense strategy. Powerful abstraction allows teams to focus on what they need to accomplish, while the platform translates that into tool-specific actions.
    Incident Response
    Phantom helps security teams investigate and respond to threats faster. Using Phantom’s automated detection, investigation, and response capabilities, teams can execute response actions at machine speed, reduce malware dwell time and lower their overall mean time to resolve (MTTR). And now with Phantom on Splunk Mobile, analysts can use their mobile device to respond to security incidents while on-the-go. Phantom’s event and case management functionality can further streamline security operations. Case-related data and activity are easily accessible from one central repository. It’s easy to chat with other team members about an event or case, and assign events and tasks to the appropriate team member.

    Offer
    Learn more about SECDO Platform
    Learn more about Splunk Phantom
    Sample Customers
    Valley National Bank, IDT Corporation
    Recorded Future, Blackstone
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Incident Response
    June 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, IBM, Trellix and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: June 2022.
    610,518 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SECDO Platform is ranked 6th in Security Incident Response with 1 review while Splunk Phantom is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 8 reviews. SECDO Platform is rated 8.0, while Splunk Phantom is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Phantom writes "Very stable with a straightforward setup and good performance". SECDO Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiSOAR, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, IBM Resilient, DFLabs IncMan SOAR and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Splunk Phantom is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, IBM Resilient, Cisco SecureX and Fortinet FortiSOAR.

    We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.