Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs SECDO Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
Cortex XSOAR enhances ROI by automating tasks, requiring mature SOC processes for effective use and reduced false positives.
Sentiment score
5.0
The SECDO Platform enhanced incident response, threat detection, and operational efficiency, providing significant cost savings and improved security posture.
We are positioning Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which can be used in the SOC and do a lot of automation for the customer.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR support is responsive and skilled, though experiences vary with occasional delays and access issues.
Sentiment score
8.5
SECDO Platform's customer service is responsive, knowledgeable, fast, effective, and appreciated for technical expertise and courteous support across various channels.
The technical support provided by Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is good.
Their support has been better than Anomali's and they are more responsive.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is praised for scalability and integration, handling enterprise demands with careful large deployment planning.
Sentiment score
7.8
SECDO Platform scales efficiently, handling increased loads and varying data volumes, suitable for small businesses and large enterprises.
The scalability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR supports our growth and security needs because we can integrate various tools and continuously add more capability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is stable and reliable, with occasional bugs and performance issues, especially in cloud environments.
Sentiment score
6.8
SECDO Platform is reliable, integrates well, detects threats effectively, enhances efficiency, and maintains stability without frequent downtime.
 

Room For Improvement

Cortex XSOAR requires improved documentation, expanded IoT support, enhanced features, and better pricing for streamlined integration and user experience.
SECDO Platform requires improved integration, simpler setup, seamless reporting, enhanced customer support, and better scalability for optimal user experience.
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play.
One of the significant issues we encounter is system slowdown when we receive an influx of alerts, which inhibits how quickly we can access the information needed for investigation.
Deployment is not easy, requiring significant tuning and building of integrations over weeks.
 

Setup Cost

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is costly but offers valuable integration and features, appealing to medium and large enterprises.
For customers, it is zero versus $20 million, which is why they have to make a decision.
 

Valuable Features

Cortex XSOAR excels in integration, automation, and customization, enhancing security operations with efficient orchestration and high user satisfaction.
Users praise SECDO Platform for automated investigations, seamless integration, advanced forensics, and user-friendly design aiding efficient security event handling.
We have implemented automation features, such as automated responses to email threats and automatic configuration of target devices for blocking specific IPs.
Execution of automatic tasks for collecting, enriching, and correlating security events from hundreds of different technologies.
If I already have an established process, I do not have to change my process to fit into the tool. I can modify the tool to fit into my process, which makes things considerably easier.
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (2nd), SOC as a Service (2nd)
SECDO Platform
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Security Incident Response (10th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (67th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is designed for Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) and holds a mindshare of 9.7%, down 12.2% compared to last year.
SECDO Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Security Incident Response, holds 4.5% mindshare, up 1.3% since last year.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR9.7%
Microsoft Sentinel16.3%
AWS Security Hub8.3%
Other65.7%
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Security Incident Response Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SECDO Platform4.5%
Proofpoint Threat Response15.4%
ServiceNow Security Operations14.4%
Other65.7%
Security Incident Response
 

Featured Reviews

DayaramGoyal - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers automation but requires enhancements for intuitive configuration
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is a good product with enhanced and efficient playbooks, as demonstrated during our use case simulations. We have implemented automation features, such as automated responses to email threats and automatic configuration of target devices for blocking specific IPs. The analytics feature in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is impressive. The solution is quite exhaustive regarding integrations, with many pre-integrations available, especially for market-leading products. There might be challenges with make-in-India products, as they tend not to build the necessary connectors. This depends on whether you are selling to enterprises or other customers. For government customers, you might encounter many Indian products, such as firewalls, which could pose integration challenges unless you have open APIs. However, for market-leading products, there are ready-made integrations available.
reviewer1643085 - PeerSpot reviewer
Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth
The initial setup can be complex. I would advise users to leverage all of the access with Palo Alto, in terms of setting up with the technical account management teams. They need to ensure that what they have in mind for the product is actually going to be what happens. I have not run into any problems with deploying the product. Any of their security products are well-documented, either with open source intelligence or the documentation from Palo Alto. We had a client with less than a thousand users that received a dedicated engineer and a technical account manager that was able to walk them through the first 90 days of ownership. The support is certainly there.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Performing Arts
24%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Media Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise24
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Comparing pricing to Micro Focus, they were offering bundles, making it free with their SIEM. For customers, it is zero versus $20 million, which is why they have to make a decision.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play. We need to see improvements in that area to facilitate cyber analysts.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Valley National Bank, IDT Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: August 2025.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.