Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ScienceLogic vs Statseeker comparison

ScienceLogic and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ScienceLogic is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.7, while Techniche is ranked #60 with an average rating of 7.0. ScienceLogic holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.
ScienceLogic
Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews
  • 2,054 Views
  • 1,495 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Statseeker
Read 38 Statseeker reviews
  • 416 Views
  • 252 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and Statseeker are competitors in the network monitoring space. Statseeker appears to have an advantage with its real-time data accuracy and efficient deployment process.

Features: ScienceLogic provides comprehensive network monitoring, efficient IT operations management, and dynamic discovery. Statseeker offers real-time visibility, streamlined efficiency, and optimized large-scale network performance for better precision and responsiveness.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance real-time data accuracy and reduce the complexity of initial setup. It might also benefit from further optimizing resource requirements. Statseeker could improve its analytics depth and expand its IT operations management capabilities, while integrating more dynamic discovery features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic has a comprehensive service model with an integrated approach to deployment and support, requiring more initial resources but ensuring extensive support. Statseeker offers a straightforward deployment process and scalable customer service, enabling quicker implementation.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic requires a higher initial setup cost but promises a strong long-term ROI with its extensive capabilities and support. Statseeker presents lower upfront costs with efficient performance optimization, making it a cost-effective choice for quicker ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
25th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (22nd), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (18th), AIOps (7th)
Statseeker
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
60th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.
Read full review
JH
Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise
The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."
"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"The power flow is great."
"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."
"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."
More ScienceLogic pros
"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."
"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."
"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."
"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."
More Statseeker pros
 

Cons

"They need a little more self-service."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."
"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."
"They should add CLI command modes​ and scripts for high performance."
"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."
More ScienceLogic cons
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."
"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."
"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."
"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."
"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."
"I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current."
"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."
More Statseeker cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."
"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."
"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."
"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."
"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."
"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."
"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."
"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."
More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice
"It's probably $5K a year for the license."
"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."
"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."
"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."
"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."
"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."
"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."
"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."
More Statseeker pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Retailer
8%
University
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?
The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?
ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?
We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Statseeker?
There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Statseeker?
Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic Logo
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic
Compared 13% of the time
Zabbix vs ScienceLogic Logo
Zabbix vs ScienceLogic
Compared 13% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic
Compared 10% of the time
Datadog vs ScienceLogic Logo
Datadog vs ScienceLogic
Compared 9% of the time
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic Logo
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic
Compared 8% of the time
More ScienceLogic Competitors
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker
Compared 54% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker
Compared 46% of the time
More Statseeker Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ScienceLogic
April 2025
ScienceLogic reportDownload ScienceLogic product report
Buyer's Guide
Statseeker
April 2025
Statseeker reportDownload Statseeker product report
 

Overview

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?
  • Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
  • Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
  • Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
  • Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
  • Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
  • Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.
What benefits and ROI should users look for?
  • Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
  • AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
  • Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
  • Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
  • Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

ScienceLogic
Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Techniche
 

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Buyer's Guide
ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker
April 2025
Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker
Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.