ScienceLogic vs Statseeker comparison

ScienceLogic and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ScienceLogic is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.6, while Techniche is ranked #61 with an average rating of 7.0. ScienceLogic holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

3,857 Views
1,813 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

613 Views
546 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and Statseeker are competitors in the network monitoring space. Statseeker appears to have an advantage with its real-time data accuracy and efficient deployment process.

Features: ScienceLogic provides comprehensive network monitoring, efficient IT operations management, and dynamic discovery. Statseeker offers real-time visibility, streamlined efficiency, and optimized large-scale network performance for better precision and responsiveness.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance real-time data accuracy and reduce the complexity of initial setup. It might also benefit from further optimizing resource requirements. Statseeker could improve its analytics depth and expand its IT operations management capabilities, while integrating more dynamic discovery features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic has a comprehensive service model with an integrated approach to deployment and support, requiring more initial resources but ensuring extensive support. Statseeker offers a straightforward deployment process and scalable customer service, enabling quicker implementation.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic requires a higher initial setup cost but promises a strong long-term ROI with its extensive capabilities and support. Statseeker presents lower upfront costs with efficient performance optimization, making it a cost-effective choice for quicker ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th), AIOps (10th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

61st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	1.2%
Statseeker	0.3%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"Power packs."

More ScienceLogic pros

"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."

"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."

"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."

"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."

"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."

"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"They need a little more self-service."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"The product is not user-friendly."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

More ScienceLogic cons

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."

"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."

"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."

"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."

"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."

"We haven't seen an ROI."

"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 12% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 39% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 26% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 17% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

September 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

September 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker

September 2025

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.