ScienceLogic vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor comparison

ScienceLogic and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. ScienceLogic is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while SolarWinds is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. ScienceLogic holds a 3.2% mindshare in SM, compared to SolarWinds’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

8,833 Views
1,943 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Read 44 SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor reviews

6,822 Views
2,115 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

ScienceLogic and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor (SAM) compete in server and application monitoring. ScienceLogic leads in customer service and ROI, while SolarWinds SAM excels in feature comprehensiveness and ease of deployment.

Features: ScienceLogic automation capabilities intelligent data gathering predictive analytics. SolarWinds SAM detailed performance metrics custom alerting systems expansive application integrations.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic reporting functionalities integration with third-party tools user interface navigation. SolarWinds SAM scalability options intuitive navigation enhanced reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic efficient deployment process outstanding customer support. SolarWinds SAM swift deployment mixed reviews on customer support quality.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic higher setup cost strong ROI. SolarWinds SAM lower initial costs significant ROI robust feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Server Monitoring

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (29th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (19th), IT Operations Analytics (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (13th), AIOps (13th)

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Ranking in Server Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), Active Directory Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 3.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is 2.9%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor	2.9%
ScienceLogic	3.2%
Other	93.9%

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Pallagani Siva Koteswararao

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Comprehensive monitoring streamlines operations with room for user support enhancement

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support team. Whenever we encounter difficulties, I raise vendor cases and am eager to deepen my understanding of those cases. Additionally, I want to learn more about ScienceLogic's dashboards, which display crucial metrics about collectors, their health, and devices aligned to them. The dashboard should be more detailed. Regarding improvements to ScienceLogic's technical support, my last company was IBM in India, and I worked on IBM MQ monitoring until my last day. I engaged with the LogicMonitor support team for MQ-level incidents, but these issues remained unresolved even after 10 to 15 days. On my last working day, I assisted with one such vendor case, and I am unsure if that issue was ever resolved. ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time. During my time working on MQ-level cases, including a power pack upgrade that did not fix the issues faced, I provided all necessary steps with the help of the middleware team. However, there were still gaps that needed addressing.

Read full review

NikhilKalwint

Technical Specialist at ServiceIO

Monitoring over a thousand systems has improved decision making and operational visibility

From an advantage perspective, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is comparatively cheaper from a commercial point of view. It is easy to install and configure, very user-friendly, and quick to get up and running, allowing you to see the early value adds in your organization. It is compatible with most technologies for monitoring with very few chances of incompatibility. Configuration also allows us to monitor all the technical parameters we are looking for, making it a very good experience for us. The alerting feature in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is a main advantage, as it alerts based on threshold breaches and can raise tickets to the ticketing system, send SMS, and email notifications, allowing engineers to work on those tickets to resolve issues and avoid further impact. The visibility into server health is a beneficial feature that I am utilizing. We widely use various application performance metrics in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor such as database monitoring and server monitoring, which are quite good enough for any monitoring solution. We utilize the customizable dashboards in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration of ScienceLogic with our existing IT ecosystems has significantly benefited our organization, as all alerts now directly go to IBM Netcool and then to the ITSM tool, ServiceNow."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

"After deploying ScienceLogic in our infrastructure and configured IT services around our critical applications we have experienced a considerable drop in major incidents which impact our customers."

"We were able to increase the monitoring coverage of both our legacy and public cloud based infrastructures, while also cutting costs by over $2 million across a five year period."

"ScienceLogic is multi-tenant from the ground up, starting at the code level."

"The Power Packs that are available are amazing."

"Overall, I really like the product, and I recommend it."

More ScienceLogic pros

"Extremely user friendly: Any IT professional can learn how to admin NPM in a short time."

"The component and cable monitoring are good. SolarWinds is more intuitive and user-friendly than AppDynamics. The AppDynamics console is more complex because it's a more feature-rich solution, so it's not easy for somebody to pick it up."

"I find it to be a strong product suite, particularly when you need a comprehensive monitoring tool."

"It's good at monitoring system-specific things like ports, services."

"Hardware health: It allows for proactive monitoring of the hardware health and is a game changer."

"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."

"AppInsight for SQL: Enables us to see the relevant error log entries on the same page as performance parameters."

"SSL Certificate Monitoring and Expiry Alerting"

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pros

Cons

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"One of the main areas for improvement would be the reporting section of ScienceLogic."

"Turning it on was pretty straightforward but getting it configured was a Herculean task and a lot of work."

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"I believe the knowledge base leaves a little room for improvement."

"I see room to do better in the network and SNMP trap processing."

"Use the professional services proposed solution to support private MIBs, we are encountering what appears to be poling time outs, which creates false positives."

More ScienceLogic cons

"Some custom applications cannot be monitored, and a lot more applications need to be included."

"There is one feature that is a report writer. And they are currently trying to take it out from being a stand-alone application and integrating to the web. This doesn't give us the flexibility and it doesn't expand what we can get when it comes to reporting. So, putting it on the web is going to make it difficult to get some information. Leaving it where it is now will help us a lot."

"For each poller, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor can only monitor up to ten thousand components, which restricts scalability."

"The tool’s report feature created issues for us. We needed to gain skills to use that feature. The tool’s customization is not easy since you have to reconfigure the whole system."

"PerfStack can be made more effective."

"When you implement SolarWinds on a larger scale my customers complain about the speed."

"Downside of the tools is the web console are hung or crash. It need to improve the performance."

"The setup was complex. We had local support to assist us."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive."

"When planning for the number of licenses to purchase, make sure you understand all of the elements within an application required to really understand performance well. In our case, we quickly came to the conclusion that an unlimited license for SAM was the way to go."

"We are on an annual license to use the solution. The price of the solution is expensive. The price is based on a bunch of factors, such as the number of engines and elements."

"Price can always be lower. It is neither on the expensive side nor on the cheap side. We have worked with them for a lot of years, so we get a discount due to the size of the installation."

"The solution's price is reasonable. Though it's on the higher side, the tool is worth the money."

"We pay around $ 2,000 to $ 5,000 yearly for the solution."

"SAM is not per server so the pricing model can be deceiving. If you have an enterprise environment, you will quickly exceed your licensing quickly. You should know this before going in."

"I have always said SolarWinds is very “proud” of their products, meaning they are expensive. I cannot afford to purchase all the licenses I need for all the SolarWinds products."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Government

Educational Organization

13%

University

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?

Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

The initial cost is quite high, but the renewal cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

There is definitely room for improvement besides simplifying its setup. As a non-technical person, I believe the dashboards could be improved. Everything we use appears on video walls, and we need ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

I am doing research as we currently have both solutions, and I am looking to see if we need both or can manage with one. Currently, the outcome indicates that we need both. The focus point is diffe...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Opsview vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

May 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

May 2026

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report

Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

SolarWinds SAM

Overview

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor provides comprehensive server, application, and infrastructure monitoring, focusing on integration, application dependency, and network insights through user-friendly interfaces and detailed dashboards.

With AppStack and AppInsight support, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers service management, detailed resource dashboards, and integration capabilities. It monitors hardware metrics and performance parameters, facilitating database and network insights for cloud and virtual environments. Robust alerting, predictive analytics, and capacity planning ensure efficient management of server health and application performance.

What are the key features?

Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing tools.
AppStack: Provides a holistic view of applications.
AppInsight: Supports widely-used applications.
SNMP Polling: Efficient network data collection.
Diagnostics: Real-time troubleshooting.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailored monitoring views.

What benefits should users expect?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Extends from servers to databases.
Transparent Control: Enhances visibility into performance metrics.
User-Friendly: Simplifies proactive monitoring with alerts.
Predictive Features: Supports capacity and trend planning.

Industries implement SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor to enhance server utilization reporting, network configuration, and AV equipment performance tracking. They benefit from monitoring critical services across diverse deployment models, improving management efficiency and decision-making.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Andr. L. Riis AS, NetSuite

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

June 2026

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.