We performed a comparison between R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) and Radware Alteon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis."
"The interface is easy, it's friendly, and has good alerting."
"The most valuable aspect is the ability to customize the types of load-balancing scenarios needed for customized applications. Some of the load balancers on the market today are strictly out-of-hand load balancers for SSL or HTTP. Radware Alteon is most useful for customizing in-house applications based on ports and protocols."
"The link load balancing is a great feature."
"The solution has been very stable."
"I found the link load balancer and server load balancer are the most valuable."
"his solution allows me to secure applications, by blocking suspicious traffic based on the signature that has been enabled for that particular application."
"Radware has been characterized by being extremely robust. This gives us the confidence to offer our users a continuous service."
"The UI is user-friendly."
"The area that should be improved is licensing."
"Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers."
"I would like to see the loading documentation improved."
"The interface implementation can be improved."
"The GUI needs to be improved. Right now, the solution isn't so user-friendly."
"We recently had a problem with the tables Obsolete ARP which was observed by the support team. It would be good to diagnose and solve this problem with a patch since it is not documented that it will be solved in later updates."
"I would like the solution to display and help visualize the reference map more easily. I would also like to better understand where queries come from and know which users are consulting the application, along with which app."
"A feature that I would like to see included in the next version might be a better analysis when working with crypt issues. Right now, it is very manual; you load it into Alteon and it runs. It would be interesting to see a more dynamic process."
"We are in the process of updating our version of the solution, so judging what should be improved is difficult. But in some cases, the visualization takes a while, especially for mapping issues."
R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Radware Alteon is ranked 10th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 33 reviews. R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "It's a good fit for a small team because the maintenance is easier and you don't need to know how to code". R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and HAProxy.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.