"The solution is user-friendly and the CLA troubleshooting is easier compared to other solutions."
"The ADCs are pretty straightforward and easy to use. There is a GUI base where you can go in and see everything, but they also have a CLI base where you can use a command and get the information that you want, very fast."
"It helps with the efficiency of application deployments and data security."
"It's a very friendly solution, easy to configure and it's very flexible."
"The SLB and GSLB load balancing are the most valuable features. They meet our need to do server-side load balancing and global site load balancing so we can distribute traffic, not only intra-data center, but inter-data center."
"A lot of our SSL management is done on the front-end side, so there is one pane of glass for a lot of our security certificates. It gives us visibility. It also falls under when certificates are going to expire. Even for servers that are coming down, we can see how that affects the traffic flow by using the services map."
"The interface is easy, it's friendly, and has good alerting."
"The most valuable feature is the load-balancing reverse proxy."
"It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size."
"There are competitors that have more features."
"There is two-factor authentication built-in, but it could be more robust."
"In my opinion, they need to improve their cloud support. There is support for cloud, but not all functions are there, such as high-availability."
"The interface and integrated custom applications can be a bit difficult."
"We are starting to do a lot with containers and how the solution hooks into Kubernetes that we haven't explored. I'm hoping that they have a lot of hooks into Kubernetes. That would be the part for improvement: Marketing use cases with containers."
"There is room for improvement in the upgrading process. Sometimes we have to contact A10 for verification of some stuff."
"The user interface is not as pretty as it could be."
"Load balancing needs improvement. It needs better integration. I heard f5 works as a DNS operator which is not available in this solution. It would be better if that was implemented."
"Support is an area that needs improvement."
"We are having a difficult time with the security module, and how to implement the Radware security."
Earn 20 points
A10 Networks Thunder ADC is ranked 5th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 6 reviews while Radware Alteon is ranked 9th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 3 reviews. A10 Networks Thunder ADC is rated 8.4, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of A10 Networks Thunder ADC writes "Using services map, we can map traffic from the front-end virtual server to back-end servers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "A good load-balancing reverse proxy for internal applications that is easy to setup and has good technical support". A10 Networks Thunder ADC is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix ADC, Kemp LoadMaster, Fortinet FortiADC and HAProxy, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix ADC, Radware LinkProof, NGINX Plus and HAProxy. See our A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Radware Alteon report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
