We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."As a basic WAF, it's better than nothing. So if you need something simple out of the box with default features, AWS WAF is good."
"We can host any DB or application on the solution."
"One common use case is using detection protection for enhancing security models in AWS. Another use case is implementing log analysis and response recovery procedures for email services."
"The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules."
"The most valuable feature is the way it blocks threats to external applications."
"The solution is stable."
"This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information."
"Rule groups are valuable."
"The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis."
"We must monitor and clean up the WAF manually."
"AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use."
"We have issues with reporting, troubleshooting, and analytics. AWS WAF needs to bring costs down."
"On the UI side, I would like it if they could bring back the geolocation view on the corner."
"The solution can improve its price."
"We haven't faced any problems with the solution."
"The product could be improved by expanding the weightage units of rules."
"AWS WAF should provide better protection to its users, and the security features need to improve."
"The area that should be improved is licensing."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 51 reviews while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). AWS WAF is rated 8.2, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.