Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution offers continuous security monitoring and alerting, which can help organizations detect and respond to security incidents in real time.""On the endpoint side, the most valuable feature is undoubtedly the cloud-based management capability, along with the ransomware protection, despite not encountering any instances so far.""Its main value and what we liked the most is its powerful AI.""The most effective CloudGuard feature for threat prevention is its web app protection.""It is a very scalable and stable solution.""The portal is quite intuitive.""The features I have found most valuable are the comprehensive threat prevention capabilities, automated policy management, and seamless integration with cloud environments.""User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Pros →

"We like that there's load balancing, firewall capabilities, DDoS protection, et cetera, all covered by Cloudflare.""The solution protects our application, which runs on the HTTP protocol, from DDoS attacks.""Someone with a basic understanding of networking and security will be able to implement the firewall's basic features within 15 minutes.""We extensively use the solution every day. The solution is very stable; we haven’t seen any glitches.""The initial setup process is simple.""The product has improved our security posture by blocking bad actors.""The integration of Cloudflare with Cloud Suite is its most valuable feature.""The security features are valuable. The particular feature we use is called OWASP."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pros →

Cons
"I do not know if it is already there, but I would like to have complete visibility between the posture management and firewall as a service.""Check Point CloudGuard Application Security needs to improve updates on integrations. It also needs to incorporate real-time monitoring features.""There are occasions when it interfaces with other systems, leading to a loss of visibility.""Deeper and more transparent integration between Cloud Application Security and analysis monitoring tools could be very valuable - although the solution currently offers integrations with third-party security tools.""It doesn't detect user activity like some of its competitors. It's not a vulnerability, but it's a legitimate activity that it doesn't detect. It only detects vulnerabilities or misconfigurations.""The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time.""I feel like I need more clarity in understanding pricing for DDoS protection.""A feature we'd like to see in the future is something that could protect against other attack vectors, with a focus on application protection."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Cons →

"A key challenge arises when dealing with numerous integrations with HVAC systems. Depending on the specifics, there might be some configuration mismatches, which necessitate specific support.""There could be an option to duplicate the cluster to maintain the consistency of rules.""Their documentation could be better. They don't have documentation that explains everything well. They have documentation for everything you're looking for, but they lack a single piece of documentation to tie everything together. As a new user or beginner, it took us a little bit of time to figure out how to put all these things in place.""The notification part could be improved. It's very much connected to Web Application Firewall, rate-limiting, and DDoS protection.""I have experienced some difficulties with Cloudflare's support as a customer based in India.""If they add logs history within the Cloudflare offering, that would be a great benefit.""The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement.""Cloudflare Web Application Firewall should improve visibility for a customer."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."
  • "The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."
  • "Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."
  • "Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."
  • "It is not cheap, but it is worth it."
  • "I find the pricing to be reasonable."
  • "If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"
  • "Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."
  • More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."
  • "We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."
  • "The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."
  • "Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."
  • "The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."
  • "Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."
  • More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.
    Top Answer:This is where I have a different opinion. If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because… more »
    Top Answer:In terms of features, I do not have any negatives. Their integration is extremely quick. It is better than others I have been involved with in the past. Their pricing model, however, can be better.
    Top Answer:The product has a valuable security control functionality.
    Top Answer:Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions.
    Top Answer:The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement.
    Ranking
    Views
    72
    Comparisons
    20
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    608
    Rating
    8.9
    Views
    8,483
    Comparisons
    6,180
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
    Cloudflare WAF
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point CloudGuard Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a cloud-based security solution engineered to safeguard web applications and APIs against diverse cyber threats. Offering protection against sophisticated attacks, it identifies vulnerabilities listed in the OWASP Top 10 and blocks new threats. Utilizing contextual AI, the system reduces false positives, allowing security professionals to focus on genuine threats. With a zero-configuration setup, it automatically adapts to application changes, ensuring minimal configuration requirements. Promising swift deployments in as little as 48 hours and robust API security, CloudGuard WAF aims to streamline application security management while delivering comprehensive protection.

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Cloud Solution Provider10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Security Firm32%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Insurance Company11%
    Engineering Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise21%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise49%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise41%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 29 reviews while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is ranked 7th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 16 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall writes "A cloud solution for web application firewall protection with rate-limiting, managed, and custom firewall rules". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube and Checkmarx One, whereas Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Akamai App and API Protector, AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.