No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Proofpoint Threat Response vs SECDO Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.3
Proofpoint Threat Response boosts ROI, saves time, cuts costs, and improves efficiency and satisfaction for management and the SOC team.
Sentiment score
5.0
The SECDO Platform enhanced incident response, threat detection, and operational efficiency, providing significant cost savings and improved security posture.
Now, it is all taken care of by Proofpoint with zero human error, allowing hours of work to be completed in minutes.
Assistant Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.7
Proofpoint offers responsive, professional customer service with effective support and documentation, ensuring user satisfaction and high-quality assistance.
Sentiment score
8.5
SECDO Platform's customer service is responsive, knowledgeable, fast, effective, and appreciated for technical expertise and courteous support across various channels.
I would rate customer support a ten because they are prompt with solutions, provide advice during troubleshooting, and their documentation is excellent.
Assistant Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
Proofpoint Threat Response scalability is mixed, dependent on hardware and integrations, with potential for improvement, especially in cloud deployment.
Sentiment score
7.8
SECDO Platform scales efficiently, handling increased loads and varying data volumes, suitable for small businesses and large enterprises.
Scalability is currently limited, as it only integrates with Proofpoint Email Protection, Proofpoint TAP, and the Abuse Mailbox.
Assistant Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Proofpoint Threat Response is praised for robust stability, though some users cite database-related scalability issues in large deployments.
Sentiment score
6.8
SECDO Platform is reliable, integrates well, detects threats effectively, enhances efficiency, and maintains stability without frequent downtime.
 

Room For Improvement

Enhancing support, integration, and interface design, while considering scalability and user interaction improvements, would benefit Proofpoint Threat Response.
SECDO Platform requires improved integration, simpler setup, seamless reporting, enhanced customer support, and better scalability for optimal user experience.
I suggest adding support for other email protection services such as Cisco IronPort, IronMail, and Abnormal, which would enhance its capabilities.
Assistant Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Proofpoint Threat Response is considered cost-effective with good value and relatively low cost compared to alternatives like Abnormal Security.
For pricing, setup cost, and licensing, it is necessary to purchase Proofpoint professional services if assistance is desired during setup, which is quite easy.
Assistant Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

Proofpoint Threat Response enhances email security with auto-pulling, phishing protection, integration, and efficient spam and false positive management.
Users praise SECDO Platform for automated investigations, seamless integration, advanced forensics, and user-friendly design aiding efficient security event handling.
Now, with Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull, integration with TAP, Abuse Mailbox, CSV integration, and other data sources, the team can perform tasks that once required hours in just a minute.
Assistant Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Proofpoint Threat Response
Ranking in Security Incident Response
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SECDO Platform
Ranking in Security Incident Response
8th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (64th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Incident Response category, the mindshare of Proofpoint Threat Response is 6.1%, down from 16.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SECDO Platform is 7.2%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Incident Response Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Proofpoint Threat Response6.1%
SECDO Platform7.2%
Other86.7%
Security Incident Response
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2839371 - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Automated email removal has reduced spam impact and gives the security team more time for analysis
Proofpoint Threat Response offers the best features through creating a workflow that deals with different types of emails, including identifying spam. If any user identifies an email as malicious, it triggers a workflow to the information security team, who will analyze it and determine whether to inform the user that it is not malicious or trigger a flow. A flow can be created for different types, where high spam emails are auto-pulled, low spam emails are quarantined for analysis, and integration with Proofpoint TRAP and Proofpoint TAP allows auto-pull for emails declared malicious. Additionally, I can revert changes if an email initially declared as spam is later found not to be spam, restoring it to the user's mailbox without user intervention. This complete feature encompasses threat response, prediction, activations, deletions, and sometimes restorations. I find myself using the integration with TAP and the integration with the Abuse Mailbox the most because those are utilized daily. Users often confuse whether an email is malicious or not, prompting them to use Proofpoint Abuse Mailbox via the report phishing button. As spammers grow more intelligent, Proofpoint TAP is also useful by flagging those emails. No action is required on our side because it is the collaboration between Proofpoint Threat Response and Targeted Attack Protection, making the SOC team's work easier, with reduced false positives, allowing them time for more productive tasks. Proofpoint Threat Response has positively impacted the organization by improving security posture, providing breathing space for the SOC team with fewer false positives, and offering a tool for users to report any malicious email using the Abuse Mailbox, which the SOC team can analyze. Proofpoint intelligence can then declare emails malicious or not and pull them from the user's mailbox. The solution has impacted us positively, safeguarding against spam while giving the SOC team the capacity to analyze needs without being overwhelmed by false positives. In previous days without Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull, the SOC team spent more than two or three hours analyzing emails, checking hash values, verifying the nature of emails, and conducting eDiscovery for malicious emails. During mass spam attacks, the entire day was consumed in firefighting mode. Now, with Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull, integration with TAP, Abuse Mailbox, CSV integration, and other data sources, the team can perform tasks that once required hours in just a minute.
it_user1643085 - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder/ CEO
Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth
The initial setup can be complex. I would advise users to leverage all of the access with Palo Alto, in terms of setting up with the technical account management teams. They need to ensure that what they have in mind for the product is actually going to be what happens. I have not run into any problems with deploying the product. Any of their security products are well-documented, either with open source intelligence or the documentation from Palo Alto. We had a client with less than a thousand users that received a dedicated engineer and a technical account manager that was able to walk them through the first 90 days of ownership. The support is certainly there.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
University
9%
Performing Arts
20%
Construction Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Proofpoint Threat Response?
For pricing, setup cost, and licensing, it is necessary to purchase Proofpoint professional services if assistance is desired during setup, which is quite easy. A license is purchased, and a techni...
What needs improvement with Proofpoint Threat Response?
To improve Proofpoint Threat Response, I suggest adding support for other email protection services such as Cisco IronPort, IronMail, and Abnormal, which would enhance its capabilities. This would ...
What is your primary use case for Proofpoint Threat Response?
Proofpoint Threat Response was initially implemented on-premises as Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull, integrated with Proofpoint Email Protection service and TAP, Proofpoint Targeted Attack Pro...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

University of Waterloo, Akorn, Fenwick and West LLP
Valley National Bank, IDT Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint Threat Response vs. SECDO Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.