Chief Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Jun 4, 2024
I have a vague idea because I don't know what others are charging. But we felt that putting up with the pains and having to spend more time keeping it running than we expected is still better than trying to have an operations team pull messages manually. So we still feel like there's good value there. It's just taking more manpower out of our team than we would like to keep the software running.
Senior Information Security Analyst at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Nov 8, 2022
The way most big companies work with Proofpoint is that they try to tie everything into an enterprise license. I can't comment on the actual costs, however I do know that alternative solutions such as Abnormal Security can be much more expensive than Proofpoint Threat Response.
Security Specialist at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Apr 11, 2019
It's quite easy to implement the solution. It takes only two to three days max, and we can run it on virtualization. It requires fewer resources. The product cost is low. It's quite affordable to have it with this much functionality and it's easy to administrate. The administration and management of the solution are very simple.
Proofpoint Threat Response effectively manages and mitigates email threats like malware and phishing. It offers advanced features for email management, including auto-pull and restore functionalities, to enhance security postures.With Proofpoint Threat Response, organizations benefit from features that streamline email security through automation and seamless integration with threat detection services. It effectively blocks potential spam and facilitates efficient incident handling via its...
The pricing it's a bit expensive, setup and licensing are simpples
I have a vague idea because I don't know what others are charging. But we felt that putting up with the pains and having to spend more time keeping it running than we expected is still better than trying to have an operations team pull messages manually. So we still feel like there's good value there. It's just taking more manpower out of our team than we would like to keep the software running.
The way most big companies work with Proofpoint is that they try to tie everything into an enterprise license. I can't comment on the actual costs, however I do know that alternative solutions such as Abnormal Security can be much more expensive than Proofpoint Threat Response.
It's quite easy to implement the solution. It takes only two to three days max, and we can run it on virtualization. It requires fewer resources. The product cost is low. It's quite affordable to have it with this much functionality and it's easy to administrate. The administration and management of the solution are very simple.