Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Netwrix Threat Manager vs Proofpoint Threat Response comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Netwrix Threat Manager
Ranking in Security Incident Response
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Proofpoint Threat Response
Ranking in Security Incident Response
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Security Incident Response category, the mindshare of Netwrix Threat Manager is 2.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Proofpoint Threat Response is 10.4%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Incident Response Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Proofpoint Threat Response10.4%
Netwrix Threat Manager2.2%
Other87.4%
Security Incident Response
 

Featured Reviews

Use Netwrix Threat Manager?
Leave a review
reviewer2460363 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Automatically remove threats from mailboxes once identified, reducing manual intervention but on-premise version doesn't scale well for large companies
Auto pull and auto restore are valuable features. Auto restore isn't quite what it should be, but it's a lot better than someone having to manually release mail back to everyone. If something's pulled and then it's later declared a false positive, it will automatically restore. They also take automatic feeds from their advanced threat detection modules. Anytime Advanced Threat Protection finds something that was allowed to go through, either a URL or attachment, it will send out a signal, and Threat Response will automatically pull all of that out of the mail files. The automation is the big thing for us. Integration capabilities: There's an API, but most of it is around how you handle incidents. We're also not using the whole Threat Response suite, just the subset. So, we've never had to or could integrate anything else. We're limited to the Exchange portion only. The whole Threat Response should be labeled as a SOAR tool. The portion we have, I would call it "SOAR-lite." I know there are a couple of others that offer a SOAR-lite, but we're just starting to look at them.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Healthcare Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Proofpoint Threat Response?
I have a vague idea because I don't know what others are charging. But we felt that putting up with the pains and having to spend more time keeping it running than we expected is still better than ...
What needs improvement with Proofpoint Threat Response?
The platform's technical support services and pricing need improvement.
What is your primary use case for Proofpoint Threat Response?
We use the product to verify and manage emails sent and received through our Microsoft Exchange server, focusing on blocking potential spam emails.
 

Also Known As

StealthDEFEND
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AIG, Disney, Charles Schwab, Columbia University, Credit Suisse
University of Waterloo, Akorn, Fenwick and West LLP
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Proofpoint, Trellix and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: December 2025.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.