We performed a comparison between PeopleFluent Talent Management and PeopleSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management."This solution is extremely flexible and the automation capabilities are great."
"Stability-wise, it is a good tool."
"It is a customizable product. We can customize it based on our needs, which is one of the features that I like about PeopleSoft. As far as financial accounting is concerned, the user interface is very good. You can also configure Chart of Accounts for all performance insights."
"The customizations allow us to come up with a lot of complex labor rules. In the Philippines, there's a lot of different kinds of rules you need to be in compliance with. The solution offers up a lot of flexibility and customization that is perfect for our region's requirements."
"All the features of the solution are integral to the functionality. Additionally, the navigation customization is beneficial."
"Flexibility in configuration."
"PeopleSoft is an amazing solution. Its users can have total control of the system, including PeopleCode, Application Engine and Component Interface, along with many other tools delivered by PeopleSoft."
"PeopleSoft is a good core system. They frequently update the solution and recently they have added some good enhancement features for higher education. We just switched to the new fluid interface and that is working very well for us. It is very good."
"PeopleSoft is easy to understand, where any end user that is logged in can easily navigate through the menus."
"The integration capabilities could be improved."
"It would be helpful for the end-user if the reports were customized. They would be able to select the fields while generating their reports."
"Often support just asks people to install a lot of upgrades. Sometimes they don't really give you clear details as to why you need to upgrade. They just say, "You need to upgrade this because there's a newer image, etc". They never really give you the reason underlying why you are having errors."
"The UI and user experience are not great, and it's not as feature-rich as today's systems. Furthermore, our implementation does not include all the components we need, like payroll or some other functions."
"PeopleSoft can improve by having proper connectors. It's very difficult to change some interfaces with the other systems."
"If there is another release, they should look at going to mobile computing to stay competitive."
"Services that need improvement include PeopleSoft Query, Pivot Grids, and PeopleSoft Test Framework."
"Agile system configurations to accommodate business dynamics."
"The area that could be improved is the upgrade process, it's not the easiest. Oracle stopped supporting our version. So we have to move either to the cloud or work in a non-supported situation. That was certainly a disadvantage. That's also the reason why we decided not to stay with Oracle. Now we are moving to SAP."
More PeopleFluent Talent Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
PeopleFluent Talent Management is ranked 27th in Talent Management while PeopleSoft is ranked 5th in Talent Management with 79 reviews. PeopleFluent Talent Management is rated 6.6, while PeopleSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PeopleFluent Talent Management writes "A flexible solution with superb automation capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". PeopleFluent Talent Management is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and SAP ERP.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.