What is SmartBear TestComplete?
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SmartBear TestComplete | 5.4% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 17.1% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.9% |
| Other | 69.6% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Test Automation Tools | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | SmartBear TestComplete vs Katalon Studio | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 17.1% | 96% | 113 interviewsAdd to research |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 4.0 | 7.9% | 87% | 98 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 185 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 124 |
| Large Enterprise | 408 |
TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.
TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.
TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:
Key Features
Reviews from Real Users
Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”
Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Sr Test Lead at Emerson | 4.5 | I use SmartBear TestComplete for automation related to power plant applications. It excels with its drag-and-drop and keyword-driven features, but customer support and compatibility with older products need improvement. It has reduced our testing time by 40% to 50%. |
| Automation Tester at Telesure Investment Holdings (TIH) | 4.5 | We primarily use SmartBear TestComplete for regression testing and automating manual test cases. Its record and playback functionality and reporting capabilities are valuable, though improvements like headless testing and better Azure DevOps integration would enhance its usefulness. |
| Head of Quality Assurance at Auxenta Inc. | 4.0 | I use SmartBear TestComplete to automate applications in our IT company. Its record feature is valuable, easing test automation. While code merging needs improvement, the product saves us time and cost, and SmartBear is addressing the issues. |
| Software Test Manager at ISUZU | 4.0 | I primarily use SmartBear TestComplete for automating web and desktop applications. Its end-to-end capabilities and tagging system are invaluable, though element identification can be challenging. Recent updates, like OCR, have improved its functionality, especially for dynamic object support. |
| Technical manager at Air Canada | 3.0 | I used SmartBear TestComplete for a pilot project focused on automating network planning application processes. While it's strong for desktop, browser, and API testing, its lack of Git integration and usability issues with functions and playback are drawbacks. |
| B2B Shared Services Testing & Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I am looking for tools that prioritize automation and API contract validation. Enhancing integration with Jira, improving reporting, and better integration with test management tools like Inflectra would enhance SmartBear TestComplete’s usability for someone with limited time. |
| Senior quality analyst at Lalli | 3.5 | I used SmartBear TestComplete for recording scripts, finding it user-friendly but too expensive compared to competitors. I experienced no ROI and encountered integration issues with BrowserStack. Previously, we used Selenium and opted for TestProject due to its cost advantages. |
| QA Analyst at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I use SmartBear TestComplete for application automation and value its image comparison feature for detecting UI changes. While performance improvements are needed, it enhances ROI by reducing manual regression efforts, allowing a single person to manage tasks efficiently. |
