No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
SmartBear TestComplete Logo

SmartBear TestComplete pros and cons

Vendor: SmartBear
3.8 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

SmartBear TestComplete offers cross-platform automation capabilities, including web, UNIX, and other systems.
It provides integration with Azure DevOps for continuous integration and deployment.
The tool is known for its ease of maintenance, with features like self-healing, which reduce the need for ongoing upkeep.
TestComplete supports various programming languages, making it easy to manage projects with libraries in Python, JavaScript, and C#.
SmartBear TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities and allows for scalable test suite creation and execution.

CONS

SmartBear TestComplete faces challenges with stability and occasional crashes, affecting reliability during usage.
Error handling and API testing features require significant improvement to enhance test management.
Integration issues are present, notably with Jenkins, Git, and other test management tools, limiting seamless workflow processes.
The pricing of SmartBear TestComplete is high, posing a constraint for potential users seeking cost-effective options.
The TestComplete Executor log file is difficult to read when large, complicating test log analysis for users.
 

SmartBear TestComplete Pros review quotes

Prakhar Goel - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Test Lead at Emerson
Jun 25, 2024
The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts.
PB
Software Test Manager at ISUZU
Oct 27, 2023
This company offers end-to-end capabilities for test suite creation and execution. One feature that I particularly appreciate is the tagging system. Tags are highly valuable, as they allow you to assign tags to your test cases. When there's an impact in a specific area, you can search for and run all test cases associated with that tag. I find this functionality very useful.
BN
Technical manager at Air Canada
Nov 28, 2023
It is a strong automation tool for desktop, browser, and API testing.
Learn what your peers think about SmartBear TestComplete. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
900,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ana Henriques - PeerSpot reviewer
B2B Shared Services Testing & Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Jul 13, 2023
The product is stable for what we are currently using it for, and it is sufficient for us.
George Mahlangu - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Tester at Telesure Investment Holdings (TIH)
Apr 18, 2024
TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.
Ashu Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior quality analyst at Lalli
Sep 21, 2023
Recording and playback of tests were easier with SmartBear TestComplete...It is a scalable solution.
Anushka Wickramaratne - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Quality Assurance at Auxenta Inc.
May 13, 2024
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
SJ
Test Lead Engineer at Strategy Compass
Sep 26, 2022
The product has many features.
reviewer1280931 - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Head- Software Services at MicroGenesis Techsoft Pvt. Ltd. at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 18, 2022
The solution is mainly stable.
reviewer1728594 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Analyst at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Apr 2, 2025
The most valuable feature of SmartBear TestComplete for me is the image comparison functionality; it quickly detects any changes in the UI.
 

SmartBear TestComplete Cons review quotes

Prakhar Goel - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Test Lead at Emerson
Jun 25, 2024
The solution’s customer support should be improved.
PB
Software Test Manager at ISUZU
Oct 27, 2023
At times, identifying or locating an element can be somewhat challenging. However, in a recent test update, they introduced Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capability. This introduction has reduced the challenges to some extent, as we can now utilize OCR if the normal method doesn't work. Nevertheless, there is still significant potential for improvement in TestComplete's ability to identify various object elements. I don't have any specific concerns to mention. I have observed significant improvements in TestComplete over the past few years, especially in its support for highly dynamic object elements used in products like Salesforce Dynamics 365. In earlier versions, there were numerous challenges, but the current version is far superior to its predecessors.
BN
Technical manager at Air Canada
Nov 28, 2023
One notable drawback is the absence of native integration with Git.
Learn what your peers think about SmartBear TestComplete. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
900,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ana Henriques - PeerSpot reviewer
B2B Shared Services Testing & Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Jul 13, 2023
SmartBear products generally have a weak link when it comes to integration with other test management tools like Inflectra.
George Mahlangu - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Tester at Telesure Investment Holdings (TIH)
Apr 18, 2024
Headless testing would be a big improvement.
Ashu Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior quality analyst at Lalli
Sep 21, 2023
The initial setup of SmartBear TestComplete was complex.
Anushka Wickramaratne - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Quality Assurance at Auxenta Inc.
May 13, 2024
In scenarios where two of our engineers work on the same task, merging codes is a bit difficult.
SJ
Test Lead Engineer at Strategy Compass
Sep 26, 2022
The pricing is the constraint.
reviewer1280931 - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Head- Software Services at MicroGenesis Techsoft Pvt. Ltd. at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 18, 2022
The integration tools could be better.
reviewer1728594 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Analyst at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Apr 2, 2025
Occasionally, image comparison results in failures, possibly due to issues with resolution or font size on the server side, which can be challenging to identify.