

OpenText Application Quality Management and TestRail both cater to test management and QA processes. TestRail appears to have an advantage in flexibility, ease of use, and integration capabilities, especially with JIRA, which is appreciated for maintaining project workflows. OpenText is valued for its robust traceability and data management capabilities, beneficial for large organizations.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers robust traceability of bugs, a robust API, and integration with automation tools for comprehensive test orchestration, which is advantageous for large-scale enterprises. TestRail is known for dashboard reporting, ease of test case management, and strong JIRA integration, making it ideal for agile development.
Room for Improvement: OpenText users highlight high costs, complex licensing models, and performance issues. Its reliance on specific browsers also limits accessibility. TestRail is critiqued for its limited reporting flexibility and role management challenges, complicating project administration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides on-premises, private, and hybrid cloud deployment options, though users report variable technical support experiences. TestRail is primarily cloud-focused, offering scalability and maintenance ease, with generally responsive customer support but desired improvements in support speed.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is often seen as costly but offers returns through its extensive features. The price can deter smaller companies, yet it remains essential for comprehensive enterprise solutions. TestRail provides a more accessible price model appealing to small and medium teams with flexible monthly and annual license plans, making it a cost-effective option for test management.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Time-wise, it saves about fifteen to twenty percent compared to Excel, and money-wise, it's around ten percent.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
Sometimes, you really need to speak to a person, and arranging such calls is not easy.
I personally escalate Leapwork issues with the Leapwork support tech team, and they are very quick to solve problems.
Just today we had a hiccup where it didn't want to integrate with Jira.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
I have never experienced any issues with its scalability.
When I started automation testing in my current company, we only had 10-20 automated test cases integrated with TestRail, but we gradually increased to 100, 200, 1000, and 2000 cases.
It also doesn't have the analytics and dashboards that you need for large scale enterprise implementations, which is why it's not really scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
It has never had any issues.
I would say seven or an eight because sometimes there are hiccups in the interface with Jira, for example.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
If you want to use TestRail for enterprise-level waterfall projects with traditional reporting and a lot of analytics, it's not good enough because the analytics, dashboards, and reporting are not really there.
TestRail lacks the functionality to map test cases to requirements and risks.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It offers good value for money.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
It significantly saves effort in managing test execution and managing all test cases.
The reporting capabilities and the simplicity of it make it user-friendly, as new users can easily understand the tool.
The integration with Jira is good. I like that because it helps to show your test results and helps you to keep traceability between your user stories and your test results.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 10.0% |
| TestRail | 8.7% |
| Other | 81.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.
Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.