Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs OP5 Monitor comparison

NETSCOUT and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NETSCOUT is ranked #78, while ITRS is ranked #70. NETSCOUT holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ITRS users who would recommend it.
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews
  • 547 Views
  • 311 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
OP5 Monitor
Read 6 OP5 Monitor reviews
  • 1,078 Views
  • 852 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

OP5 Monitor and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG are competing products in the network monitoring domain. While OP5 Monitor is praised for pricing and cost-effectiveness, NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG leads with advanced features.

Features: OP5 Monitor is valued for scalability, reporting capabilities, and efficient alerting systems, well-suited for diverse network environments. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG offers advanced traffic analysis, packet capture, and real-time visibility, fitting large enterprises needing detailed network insights.

Room for Improvement: OP5 Monitor could improve in user interface design, integration options with third-party tools, and detailed traffic analysis functionalities. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG needs enhancement in user-friendliness, ease of setup, and pricing flexibility to accommodate smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OP5 Monitor is recognized for straightforward deployment and reliable support, appealing for quick setups. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG provides comprehensive deployment options with strong customer service but may require an intensive setup process.

Pricing and ROI: OP5 Monitor offers an attractive pricing structure balancing initial setup costs with long-term ROI, ideal for budget-conscious companies. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG, with a higher initial cost, delivers significant ROI for those prioritizing detailed network analysis capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. OP5 Monitor Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. OP5 Monitor
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
78th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OP5 Monitor
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
70th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (53rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OP5 Monitor is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Michael Gideon Genita - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support
I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution.  It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable.  The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products.  Under the pocket flow…
Read full review
Harish Venkateshappa - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful online resources, customizable, and highly effective monitoring
The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users. If there are corrupt files the data can be extracted from them. Anyone who wants to see the performance of memory usage, such as whether it's at 80 to 90 percent, can use this tool. However, other tools can provide this information in two minutes, this tool is more time-consuming and the report it provides is not very effective for practical use. When it comes to reports, the tool falls short. During a recent call, it was noted that while the company has distributed servers across the globe, only the master server can accommodate the reports and events, causing delays. If other servers experience issues, the team cannot view the reporting or tag things, such as for troubleshooting purposes. If this aspect was improved it would be an excellent tool.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has cut our troubleshooting down by days. Once we have a product in place, we show people examples of how it can streamline their troubleshooting process."
"It helps us to assist our customers to isolate problems. If it is us who is having the problem, then we can use it to streamline the process."
"The most valuable features are speed and cost."
"It helps us get to root cause quickly. With utilization and consumption of bandwidth, we can usually see what application is taking as much as they should (or shouldn't), then account for it accordingly."
"It's an easy product to set up."
"The ability to troubleshoot customers' connectivity has been very beneficial."
"When we have mobile operators who are signal partners, where one is the roaming host and another is the roamer, we are able to see their traffic. Their packets are able to detect if any faults to develop, and at what point they fail."
"I love the single pane of glass view. It makes it easier to not have to navigate everywhere. It allows more simplistic visibility, without having to go from tool to tool to tool, or from window to window to window."
More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros
"With limited hardware or a virtual machine, you can address a huge network, hundreds of thousands of elements that need to be monitored. Other commercial software is not on that level."
"OP5 Monitor is a great choice due to its being built on an open-source monitoring tool and provides ample opportunity for customization based on specific support requirements. It is also user-friendly and easy to manage with a wide range of plugins available for use. In comparison to other enterprise tools, such as Micro Focus, OP5 Monitor stands out for its features and cost-effectiveness, making it the best tool in the market. Customization is one of the key strengths of the tool and provides a lot of capabilities. Additionally, it is easy to find support and plugins for the tool through online resources."
"The API makes it pretty easy to integrate with any system."
"The best feature is that it is very relatable, stable, and scalable. The logger is a part of the software, but it's not the most important point of it."
"It monitors and continuously tests everything that is of importance to you and your users. It could be everything from monitoring disk space to CPU usage to memory. It could include determining if the response time in your e-commerce platform is quick enough, or whether you have too many bounces from some of the pages on your website. You want to monitor anything that could cost you money or time or resources. You can do that with this system. It's very flexible."
"We can also observe whatever we want, and there are no limitations."
 

Cons

"We don't use the single pane of glass view, even though we own it."
"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."
"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."
"I would like to see an improved level of stitching between IPs."
"There is a timeout feature that we have been asking for awhile."
"Being able to manage the packet flow switches in nGeniusONE would be great."
"The single pane of glass feed still needs work."
"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."
More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons
"The user interface is not what we are used to these days, and should be improved."
"IT environments today are in constant flux. This is driven by the newer cloud technologies such as Kubernetes and Docker, etc. The whole Nagios-based monitoring system that OP5 is created on top of, is based on a host-service model. There is a need for a strategy on what to do with more dynamic environments. There is some cool stuff going on in that direction."
"They need to improve the dashboard interface."
"We do not get performance reports properly."
"OP5 lacks some visualization, a feature that makes some other products nice. Op5 is built for purpose, which is fine, but if you compare it with some new products, the visualization is not so appealing, especially for management... If you don't need fancy visualizations, OP5 is fine."
"The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."
"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."
"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."
"This product could be cheaper."
"The price is a little high."
"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."
"OP5 has a very low price as a solution, compared to many other solutions out there."
"The cost of the license and support are separate. If you want platinum call support, it will cost more than a regular call. I did not opt for it, as it is an additional cost."
"It was not expensive. And because it's less demanding in terms of hardware, you don't have to pay for another SQL or other database license, and you can have a huge installation on one machine..."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Compared 35% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Compared 29% of the time
Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Logo
Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Compared 19% of the time
cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Logo
cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Compared 17% of the time
More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors
Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 27% of the time
Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 21% of the time
Opsview vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Opsview vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 20% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
Checkmk vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Checkmk vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
More OP5 Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
April 2025
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reportDownload NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report
Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor
April 2025
OP5 Monitor reportDownload OP5 Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream
No data available
 

Overview

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT

OP5 Monitor - The Complete Monitoring Solution

OP5 Monitor is a flexible and highly scalable monitoring solution for all sizes of environments. Use just one product to monitor your IT environment regardless of location, whether on-premise, in dynamic environments, public cloud or a hybrid of these.

Digital transformation adds extra layers and complexity to the IT estate by creating a hybrid IT environment of both static and dynamic environments, that can be difficult to monitor efficiently. ITRS OP5 Monitor gives enterprises full visibility over their entire IT estate through a single pane of glass, allowing them to consolidate monitoring tools and cut down costs.

ITRS
 

Sample Customers

U.S. Department of Defense
Svenska Spel, Carus, VGL, Tele2, Viking Line, Clas Ohlson, Vanderlande, Försäkringskassan
Buyer's Guide
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. OP5 Monitor
April 2025
Free Report: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. OP5 Monitor
Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. OP5 Monitor and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. OP5 Monitor report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.