Microsoft Dynamics GP vs Microsoft Dynamics SL comparison

Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL are both solutions in the ERP category. Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.1, while Microsoft Dynamics SL is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft Dynamics GP holds a 1.0% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft Dynamics SL’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft Dynamics GP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft Dynamics SL users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 23 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

892 Views
654 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics SL

Read 3 Microsoft Dynamics SL reviews

173 Views
114 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Microsoft Dynamics SL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL are enterprise resource planning products. Dynamics SL holds an edge in industry-specific functions crucial for project-driven organizations, while Dynamics GP is strong in accounting and financial management across various sectors.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics GP offers superior financial management, HR capabilities, and general accounting tools. Microsoft Dynamics SL provides advanced project accounting, industry-specific modules, and tools ideal for construction, government contracting, and professional services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dynamics SL integrates efficiently with existing project management solutions, ideal for complex project needs, but may require specialized support. Dynamics GP offers an easy deployment focused on core accounting functionalities with comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics GP generally has lower setup costs with solid ROI due to its wide applicability. Microsoft Dynamics SL involves a higher initial investment, justified by its project-specific modules and potential ROI in industries requiring such features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Dynamics SL

Ranking in ERP

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics SL is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Firaz Mohammed

Information Technology Manager at a retailer with 51-200 employees

Offers great integration capabilities and allows just the real-time inventory

Dynamics GP improves inventory management by offering real-time inventory tracking, and automated purchase order creation, receiving, and updating inventory levels. It facilitates site-to-site transfers and allocation tracking, enabling efficient stock management across locations. The integration capability of Dynamics GP, combined with Power Platform, has transformed our business processes. We now use PowerApps to enable salesmen to send orders electronically, eliminating the need for order books. Additionally, we developed HR apps to streamline tasks for our staff, leading to automated processes and improved efficiency. Our experience with Dynamics GP reporting and analytics features, particularly Advanced Analysis, has been great. We utilize customized smart lists for purchasing and other functions, allowing for tailored insights over specific periods. Additionally, we have developed custom dashboards for enhanced visibility and support portal integration. I wouldn't recommend Dynamics GP due to its legacy status and impending end of support. However, if integration with the Power Platform is crucial and the company prioritizes modernization, it could still be a viable option. For new companies, I would suggest considering Dynamics 365 Business Central for a more modern solution. Overall, I would rate Dynamics GP as a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Simplify and streamline complex business processes, and good integration capabilities but lacks predictive capabilities

An area of improvement could be around automation and predictability. However, I'm sure Microsoft is already thinking about incorporating AI co-pilot features, which should be coming soon. The end person who will be looking at the report is the CFO, and CFO isn't just interested in static reports but in predictive information. Ideally, SL could use data from ERP, and CRM to provide some level of prediction. CoPilot is plugged into Dynamics, it'll be a plus and even a huge selling point over other solutions that are there in the market because now we have a component of AI. We can also give you some level of prediction. Even if it starts with a 15% confidence level, a CFO will take that because it still allows them to increase their bets to a certain extent. So, that's something that I I will look forward to whenever Microsoft introduces it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to use and not complicated. Also, it is easy to get trained on. Also, there is good information available on the web. The GP community is quite broad and there are many blogs online."

"The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. "

"Snowflake's ability to handle large queries efficiently is very beneficial, unlike other databases which can take a significant amount of time for similar tasks."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations."

"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."

"It's enhanced by a subscription billing add-on, to efficiently automate billing and invoicing, particularly due to our substantial customer database."

"The most valuable feature is financial control. The accounting aspect allows us to manage our clients and payments."

"It is strong in integration."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

"If I put myself in the customer's shoes, it's easier to use. Reporting would be a very valuable feature."

"It's pretty easy to set up."

"The solution has provided a good return on investment by ensuring our financial and operational information is accurate and timely."

Cons

"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."

"It still can be improved in web-based and build reporting. "

"At times, navigating the user console can be challenging, particularly when trying to find account information."

"The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."

"With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that."

"Many of our customers are migrating to the cloud rather than staying on-premises."

"Initially, we encountered challenges, particularly with users transitioning from their previous applications."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

"The product's primary improvement area would be its batch processing system."

"An area of improvement could be around automation and predictability."

"The licensing of the solution should be adjusted. The policies aren't ideal. They should make it easier to understand. Right now, it's too confusing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an affordable solution."

"The solution's price is steep."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"The licensing costs were reasonable."

"If the value proposition is clear for the customer, they won't see it as an expensive solution. A solution becomes expensive when it doesn't do what it promises."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Dynamics GP?

The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I wish Microsoft gets Dynamics GP to a cloud-based solution, but unfortunately Microsoft had announced the End of Life for Dynamics GP.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Dynamics SL?

If I put myself in the customer's shoes, it's easier to use. Reporting would be a very valuable feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics SL?

The product's primary improvement area would be its batch processing system. Transitioning to a transactional processing system would significantly enhance its efficiency and usability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics SL?

Our primary use case for the platform was managing our financial and operational processes across multiple companies. We are a group with 11 to 12 companies, and Dynamics SL has been integral in ma...

See all answers

Comparisons

Odoo vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 25% of the time

Epicor ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 17% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 14% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics SL

Compared 100% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics SL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

April 2025

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Buyer's Guide

ERP

April 2025

Download Microsoft Dynamics SL product report

Also Known As

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Dynamics SL, MS Dynamics SL

Overview

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.

Microsoft

Project management, job costing, materials management, service call entry, receiving, billing, and sales solution.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

ASAP, Espartec, S.A de C.V., TGLT, Calder‹n Autopartes El_ctricas, GGS Systems, CLEAResult, Shared Spectrum Company, Scope Global Pty Ltd

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL

April 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.