Loom Systems vs Pandora FMS comparison

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

861 Views
642 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Loom Systems and Pandora FMS are competing products in the IT monitoring and management category. Loom Systems is favored for ease of use and intuitive functionality, while Pandora FMS has the upper hand with its extensive monitoring capabilities.

Features: Loom Systems integrates AI-driven analytics, predictive maintenance, and automation to provide actionable insights and reduce downtime. Pandora FMS features customizable dashboards, extensive monitoring options for network, application, and server, and granularity with customization.

Room for Improvement: Loom Systems could enhance its feature set to cater to more complex environments, expand its customization capabilities, and offer more versatile deployment options. Pandora FMS may benefit from simplifying its setup process, streamlining its customer support to be more responsive, and enhancing ease of use for quick adaptation by users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Loom Systems offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment and responsive customer service, appealing to those seeking rapid implementation. Pandora FMS provides both cloud and on-premises deployment options, which can require additional maintenance, but benefits from a flexible support network.

Pricing and ROI: Loom Systems uses a predictable pricing model with no hidden fees, ensuring rapid ROI for cost-focused businesses. Pandora FMS offers competitive pricing with an initial investment for deployment and training. Its extensive functionalities justify the cost for enterprises needing thorough monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Loom Systems vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: April 2025).

Loom Systems vs. Pandora FMS

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

66th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (2nd)

Pandora FMS

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

40th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (41st), Server Monitoring (16th), Log Management (40th), Cloud Monitoring Software (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at FIS

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"Thanks to its flexibility, I have been able to adapt the tool to our servers and find out quickly how their console works."

"The solution has good dashboards and graphics."

"Features I have found most valuable with Pandora are the personalized metrics and the simplicity of data."

"This solution has screens that are easy to understand and provide a wealth of information."

"The most valuable features are auto-discovery and automatic detection of the network topology and network monitoring."

"It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain."

"The official forum is active enough to answer most of the high-end technical questions that you may have."

"We are able to control our business with this all-in-one monitoring tool."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."

"When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious."

"In the future, we may have double the number of devices, and we do not want to have any issues with performance in the data display."

"I think some improvements to the Android app would be good."

"The price for Pandora FMS is expensive."

"Their support is good, but it is just online communication. It would be great to be able to just call someone and talk to them instead of always writing. It works well for me because I am a decent communicator in email, but some people might find it difficult to describe in a written fashion and communicate with them that way. There is a learning curve to the interface, but once you get used to it, it is actually very powerful. They have a lot of options, but people struggle with the interface. They've improved it though, and it is getting better. They need to keep improving the learning curve to help buy-in. I'm the guy that manages it, so I'm comfortable with it. They can refine the upgrade agents to be easier. They can also do more refinement in end-user usability because not everyone is strong technically, and people who aren't strong technically might be averse to the product, even though it has come a long way. It has a complete GUI and everything."

"The product lacks APIs for integration with other systems."

"It would be helpful to include the generation of reports for times that the network was out of service."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Government

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

No data available

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 31% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 22% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Download Loom Systems product report

Download Pandora FMS product report

Overview

Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.

ServiceNow

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Sample Customers

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Loom Systems vs. Pandora FMS