


OneLogin and JumpCloud compete in the identity and access management space. OneLogin seems to have the edge with its strong focus on authentication efficiency, whereas JumpCloud excels in device and user management, offering comprehensive cross-platform support.
Features: OneLogin offers Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and user provisioning, which help organizations streamline access and enhance security. It provides pre-built SSO connectors and allows for custom connector creation. JumpCloud focuses on device management, cross-platform support, and directory services, making it suitable for environments with Windows, macOS, and Linux systems. It empowers organizations by supporting diverse operating systems and enhancing device management.
Room for Improvement: OneLogin could enhance analytics and reporting, as well as expand third-party integration capabilities. Users desire a modernized interface and improved lifecycle management. JumpCloud needs a more intuitive user interface, enhanced network-level security, and better conditional access features. Improving mobile and device management features would significantly elevate JumpCloud's offering.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both OneLogin and JumpCloud are primarily deployed on public clouds, providing flexibility and scalability. OneLogin has received mixed reviews regarding customer support, particularly following its acquisition, whereas JumpCloud is noted for accessibility but faces some criticisms concerning response times. Both can improve their seamless customer service experiences.
Pricing and ROI: OneLogin is considered cost-effective relative to alternatives like Okta, though some users note price increases on renewals. It enhances ROI by reducing help desk tickets and streamlining security processes. JumpCloud's competitive pricing and tiered plans are praised for device and user management, despite some users finding full-featured packages costly. Both solutions deliver concrete ROI by improving operational efficiency, with OneLogin focusing on authentication and JumpCloud enhancing device management and flexibility.
With iboss, whenever you turn on your laptop, the iboss agent automatically connects to the iboss cloud, enforcing all security policies. So with respect to the security side, it strengthens measures.
I have seen some cost effectiveness from iboss; it has reduced certain support requirements, making it a more hands-off solution.
After implementing JumpCloud, I found I do not require Windows installations, which is very helpful and cost-effective, while also maintaining effective security levels.
Metrics show a reduction in identity and access management costs, potentially between 40 and 60 percent.
The time saved on onboarding and device management is significant, probably a 75% reduction.
Teams spend far less time on password issues, access requests, and onboarding, often cutting IT tickets by 30 to 50 percent.
We have been able to save 50% of our cost and time.
I notice strong ROI as it helps reduce help desk tickets, provides major time savings in user management, improves productivity with SSO, and provides better security overall, lowering operational costs and increasing efficiency.
They are very fast, responsive, and knowledgeable.
The quality of the support is fantastic.
We had promising discussions about resolving these issues, but no real action followed.
Customer support should be enhanced, especially the response time which should be much faster than it is now.
I have not needed to contact JumpCloud's technical support since the setup and usage are quite straightforward and well-documented.
The customer support provided by JumpCloud is fantastic, as they respond properly and provide solutions when required.
I would rate the customer support a 10.
I have contacted support on a few occasions, mainly for advanced configuration guidance, troubleshooting provisioning issues, and clarifying documentation for complex integrations.
Whenever we've had questions or needed help with setup, their team responded quickly and really guided us step by step.
They are also able to meet on-demand requirements based on your contract with them, and can easily provide adequate resources and scalability.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
If I start seeing sluggishness or anything like that, I just reach out to my rep, and they connect with their dev team, typically resolving it the same day.
With AWS SSO, it is ten out of ten.
JumpCloud's scalability is quite robust, designed to easily accommodate growing organizations and fluctuating user counts.
We have grown quite a bit since we implemented it, and it has scaled with us without any major issues.
Role-based access controls, automated provisioning, and directory integration scale smoothly, allowing me to maintain consistent policies and workflows even as complexity increases.
It has strong technical capabilities designed to be horizontally scalable, easily supporting a large user base without the need for manual infrastructure upgrades.
Since it is a cloud-based IAM platform, scaling is much easier compared to traditional systems.
It's been pretty solid; I've never had an outage with them, and if I ever had, it's only been once out of the seven years.
We've experienced zero downtime.
Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device despite our ClearPass sending information to the iboss box.
JumpCloud is considered to be quite stable, offering reliable performance and consistent uptime for identity and access management.
I rate the stability of JumpCloud ten out of ten.
It did not initially recognize my microphone.
Overall, OneLogin's stability gives me confidence that it can support my organization's current needs and scale as we grow.
There have been no major outages, and performance has been really consistent.
During the trial period, which was for thirty days, I never faced any downtime.
It is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform.
We also had a problem with a transition when we upgraded from one appliance of theirs to another, but their engineer lost a good deal of our data.
Our iboss subscription access should be more secure with an OTP or VPN etc.
I believe the mobile device management, the MDM side of JumpCloud, could be enhanced further for more complex scenarios, and a more intuitive user interface for certain administrative tasks would be beneficial.
This would be helpful, especially for AWS users, by providing broader support for different cloud platforms and private cloud environments.
A tutorial on how to use some new features, such as RADIUS, or use cases that show the best practice on how to solve some cases would be beneficial.
More real-time alerts, such as when access fails or MFA is triggered, would help users understand issues faster.
Step-by-step tutorials and troubleshooting guides would help users resolve issues faster without needing to contact support.
It is easy to implement and incorporate in any enterprise, and you can define the ROI pretty fast.
It offers the same features you would get from a vendor that charges 250,000 British pounds for a fraction of the price.
The following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs.
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern.
AWS charges per user, which can be costly if I have more than ten users.
JumpCloud licensing is based on how many users they register in JumpCloud, and each user can have multiple devices, up to three devices.
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of JumpCloud has been positive, as I am happy with the support provided, and this setup cost is effective.
The cost is less compared to Okta and Entra ID.
Overall, the pricing, setup, and licensing structure are transparent and deliver a good return on investment, especially when considering the operational efficiency and security improvements gained from using OneLogin.
I consider the pricing of OneLogin to be competitive since it is cheaper than other products I used, such as Okta, which is beneficial for mid-size organizations.
The solution's mental health function can detect if someone needs help.
It's given us a lot more visibility into our computer assets that may be infected with viruses and also shows us people who have unusually large uploads or might be engaging in high-risk activities, such as searches or going to sites not categorized by their web crawler.
iboss was the best solution for us because, no matter what domain you were in, everything is under a single pane of glass, which is exactly what we wanted.
The most impactful feature of JumpCloud is that it allows me to use one credential for all platforms or accounts, reducing the need to remember multiple credentials.
The feature that I use most is that the user has only one portal to access the applications, such as SSO applications like Google Workspace and the web applications that support SAML or OpenID.
JumpCloud has given us a much more secure environment, and as we move toward a SOC 2 Type 2, having JumpCloud in place made it very easy to gather the evidence we needed to prove that we were doing what we should be doing.
Multi-Factor Authentication is generally useful for adding an extra layer of security, which is crucial, especially for the sensitive nature of the data we handle.
With SmartFactor Authentication, I can balance between them. I can give users an easy and smooth user experience as long as the risk indices are low, but I can implement pretty rigid authentication workflows if the risk gets higher.
OneLogin's best features are its MFA capabilities as well as making it easier to access different applications depending on the user.



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 91 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.
Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.
What are the most important features of Iboss?The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.
JumpCloud offers efficient device management, single sign-on, and integration capabilities. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, streamlining user management across diverse environments.
JumpCloud delivers device, user, and application management across platforms like Windows, Mac, Linux, and cloud services such as AWS and Azure. Acting as a cloud-based directory, it facilitates single sign-on and identity access management, making it an attractive replacement for Active Directory and LDAP directories. Its policy management and centralized directory simplify user and device administration, offering a user-friendly interface with flexible access control and remote management. Organizations can experience streamlined onboarding and offboarding processes, robust authentication, and scalability. Despite being powerful, room for improvement is noted in alert capabilities, comprehensive MDM for Windows, multi-tenant features, and API reliability.
What are the key features of JumpCloud?Companies across industries utilize JumpCloud for comprehensive management of devices and user identities. It is especially beneficial in technology-driven sectors where centralized directory services replace traditional Active Directory and LDAP models. Organizations employing platforms like AWS and Azure find it essential for maintaining efficient and secure access management.
OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.
Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.
What are the key features of OneLogin?Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.
We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.