We performed a comparison between JBoss ESB, Mule ESB, and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."
"The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid."
"This tool has exceptional API management and integration connectors in addition to multiple out of the box connectors."
"The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."
"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."
"Easy connectivity and easy integration."
"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"The routing and aggregation are the most valuable features. It's split and join."
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."
"It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management."
"From an improvement perspective, there should be fewer coding challenges for users in Mule ESB."
"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"Community editions need more attention."
"Mule ESB could be more user-friendly. I think users must learn about the architecture before they start coding. The price could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an EDIFACT integration."
"The payment system needs improvement."
"Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
Earn 20 points
