Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Integration Bus vs Oracle Service Bus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.3
IBM Integration Bus offers varied ROI, aiding digital transformation, with long-term benefits and cost reductions from efficient integrations.
Sentiment score
6.7
Oracle Service Bus enhances operational efficiency, providing cost savings, adaptability, scalability, and improved problem-solving without direct ROI.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
IBM Integration Bus customer service is rated high for expertise, though some users cite delays and high costs.
Sentiment score
6.3
Oracle Service Bus support receives mixed reviews, with responsiveness varying by local versus global support and cloud services.
I would rate the technical support of IBM Integration Bus as nine out of ten; it was the best.
I rate the technical support from Oracle a nine out of ten.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
IBM Integration Bus excels in scalability, supporting diverse configurations and high performance, ideal for enterprise deployment with minor version limitations.
Sentiment score
7.0
Oracle Service Bus is scalable, excelling in enterprise scenarios but facing challenges with memory, complexity, and cloud scalability.
There are dependencies on the Java version and application being used.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
IBM Integration Bus is praised for its exceptional stability and reliability, crucial for handling extensive infrastructure integration smoothly.
Sentiment score
7.9
Oracle Service Bus is highly stable and reliable, often rated 8 or 9 for stability by users.
In my experience, it is a scalable solution, and IBM Integration Bus is indeed a stable product.
I rate the stability of the product as eight out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Integration Bus needs enhancements in functionality, support, cost, interface, architecture, and integration with cloud and DevOps.
Oracle Service Bus requires improvements in logging, error handling, integration, documentation, installation, security, scalability, and modernization to enhance usability.
They are improving one of the nodes such as the HTTP request node, implementing the indirect retry mechanism itself, and we are getting new features.
This can happen due to legacy systems that might not allow the use of microservices.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Integration Bus is costly for small firms but reasonable for large enterprises, with concerns over licensing complexity.
Oracle Service Bus pricing is high with licensing complexity, but valuable in bundles and suitable for large enterprises.
Regarding the pricing setup cost and licensing for IBM Integration Bus, I believe it is expensive.
I view both Oracle and IBM products as expensive.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Integration Bus excels with protocol support, scalability, and security, offering seamless system integration and intuitive GUI for enterprises.
Oracle Service Bus simplifies integration with diverse applications through comprehensive adapters, robust data handling, and a user-friendly interface.
The features I find most valuable in IBM Integration Bus are very useful for performing transformations from systems such as SAP to Salesforce, and from Salesforce to S/4 and 365.
The main advantage of Oracle Service Bus is the possibility to integrate different systems using workflows and different architectures in the same product.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Integration Bus
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Service Bus
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of IBM Integration Bus is 22.1%, up from 21.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Service Bus is 11.4%, up from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
 

Featured Reviews

Ashraf Siddiqui - PeerSpot reviewer
Helpful for complex integrations because it has tools and functionality to integrate with other systems
Everything needs to be improved. As far as integration and the cloud are concerned, things are moving to the cloud side. When you use Kubernetes and similar technologies, IBM Integration Bus doesn't greatly facilitate these environments. Maybe I don't know enough about that, but I feel that when it comes to the DevOps environment, the tool needs to be deployed on production in a way that's just like pods. Cloud integration needs to be more facilitated with the DevOps environment. This IBM technology needs to adapt because in the recent world, in the real world, we see that everything is just a cloud pod. Whenever you need to scale anything, you just put some cloud and pod and improve it, make any server and deploy it. But in IBM Integration Bus, there is a problem because we can't do this as easily. In short, IBM needs to more emphasize or more integrate with the cloud environments as well, similar to DevOps. There are limitations in IBM Integration Bus when it comes to DevOps.
Awa Sri - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers valuable features of API management and protocol definition
The initial setup process of Oracle Service Bus is quite easy. The installation of the product can be completed in one or two hours, but the total deployment time varies from case to case. I believe the entire deployment of Oracle Service Bus can be finished within a day. One engineer is enough to deploy the solution. The solution can be easily maintained.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...
What do you like most about IBM Integration Bus?
The message queue, like, message queue connectors. Then they have a built in connectors for most of the systems, like SAP, oracle database, and this Civil connector is there. Of course, we have thi...
What do you like most about Oracle Service Bus?
The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Service Bus?
I view both Oracle and IBM products as expensive. There are no significant differences in pricing between these products.
What needs improvement with Oracle Service Bus?
The main problem could be related to timeout issues. This can happen due to legacy systems that might not allow the use of microservices. It's a different viewpoint of the system, and such constrai...
 

Also Known As

IBM WebSphere ESB
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Salesbox, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Road Buddy, Swiss Federal Railways, Electricity Supply Board, The Hartree Centre, ESB Networks
MakeMyTrip Ltd., Griffith University, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Pacfico Seguros Generales, IGEPA IT-SERVICE GmbH, Guangzhou Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Pacfico Seguros Generales, Bank Audi S.A.L., Rydges Sydney Airport, Intelligent Pathways, Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Integration Bus vs. Oracle Service Bus and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.