We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The message queue, like, message queue connectors. Then they have a built in connectors for most of the systems, like SAP, oracle database, and this Civil connector is there. Of course, we have this SQL database connector So those built in connectors are there. For the almost most of the systems, we have built in connectors. And second thing is that it is a stateless Integration, so it doesn't maintain a state of the integration. Bus the Stitches Integration makes it very fast."
"IBM Integration Bus is a very strong tool."
"Having the solution come from IBM you know you are receiving a product of quality in components and in the services, it is very good."
"The most valuable features of the IBM Integration Bus are the flexibility to easily integrate with other solutions, such as SAP or any other vendors."
"The message queue feature is very valuable."
"The message queue connectors are the most valuable feature. They have built-in connectors for most of the systems, like SAP and Oracle Database."
"The most valuable feature is that it is clear and easy to learn."
"The most valuable feature is that it's robust and its time to market is very short."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"It is stable."
"The routing and aggregation are the most valuable features. It's split and join."
"The password settings need improvement."
"I would like to be able to build an Integration Bus cluster that is active-active."
"IBM could improve its connectivity."
"Development toolkit (based on Eclipse) should be improved in terms of responsiveness."
"Current aggregation implementation should be deprecated. MQ independent, as well as an intuitive solution, should be proposed."
"They need to come up with Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). It should also have a feature for integrating with those applications that are on the cloud."
"Session management can sometimes hand forcing server reboots."
"The solution needs instruction or guidance."
"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"It's very complex and hard to learn. There's a steep learning curve."
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 63 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, webMethods Integration Server, IBM DataPower Gateway and Red Hat Fuse, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus. See our IBM Integration Bus vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.