We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the adapters."
"It is stable."
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications."
"The GUI and IDE features of this solution are easy to work with and to develop. We find application management easy using this solution. It is a stable product"
"The solution is very stable."
"The most attractive and beneficial feature is the ease of development."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust."
"The stability of this solution is excellent."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring, ease of use, and easy to understand development GUI."
"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use."
"It is easy to develop. It has a very wide range of features. The older versions are very stable, and there are no issues with the product."
"The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations."
"If they can containerize this, that would be nice. If they can provide docker images and offer support for those containers, that would be great."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"Issues with the support, the fees, and the termination of the professional services are reasons we are looking for other solutions."
"The stability of their latest version is not on par with their classic version 5.X."
"Migration to cloud solutions or products should be made convenient, transparent, and easily understandable."
"In the configuration, where we need to customize, it takes more time that we expect it to, ideally."
"In the next release, there should be improvements made to the API manager."
"If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs."
"We'd like to see improvements in product support."
"The solution is very expensive when you use multiple components, it would b better if this could be reduced."
More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 6th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 25 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is ranked 9th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 12 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus writes "A robust product that needs to improve the functionality it offers related to API lifecycle management". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and IBM DataPower Gateway, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, Red Hat Fuse, IBM DataPower Gateway and IBM WebSphere Message Broker. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus report.
See our list of best ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) vendors.
We monitor all ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.