We performed a comparison between Fiorano ESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."
"The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."
"One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn."
"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."
"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."
"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."
"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"If they can containerize this, that would be nice. If they can provide docker images and offer support for those containers, that would be great."
"What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution."
Fiorano ESB is ranked 10th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 5 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. Fiorano ESB is rated 9.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fiorano ESB writes "Scalable and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". Fiorano ESB is most compared with Mule ESB and IBM Integration Bus, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and IBM WebSphere Message Broker.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
