Mule ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Salesforce and WSO2 are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Salesforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0, while WSO2 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. Salesforce holds a 18.0% mindshare in E, compared to WSO2’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Mule ESB

Read 52 Mule ESB reviews

4,072 Views
3,054 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,861 Views
856 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Mule ESB

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Mule ESB and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator compete in the integration platform category. Mule ESB seems to have the upper hand with its wide array of connectors and flexible integration solutions, while WSO2 focuses more on stability and API management.

Features: Mule ESB offers a wide selection of connectors, making it easy for developers to integrate services. It also features DataWeave and Mule Expression Language, enhancing its flexibility and performance. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator provides strong API management and various connectors, with a focus on stability. It supports integration of diverse applications through efficient mediation and transformation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Mule ESB could improve in providing more stable upgrades, simplifying its documentation, and enhancing SOAP services support. Its high memory consumption and pricing are also areas of concern. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator needs better documentation, simpler customization options, and improved clustering capabilities. Enhancing on-premise analytics support would also be beneficial for users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mule ESB supports Public, Private, and Hybrid Cloud setups and offers mixed reviews on customer service. It benefits from community support. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly serves on-premises environments and is generally seen to have satisfactory customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Mule ESB's enterprise version is costly, with various licensing and deployment options, while the Community Edition suits budget-conscious users. WSO2's pricing is considered more affordable for small to medium-sized enterprises, providing open-source flexibility but with potentially high enterprise subscription costs. Both solutions can deliver ROI when used effectively, though Mule ESB may be relatively more expensive.

To learn more, read our detailed Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mule ESB

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Mule ESB is 18.0%, down from 22.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 5.6%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Mule ESB	18.0%
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	5.6%
Other	76.4%

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

Maharsh-Kapadia

Enterprise Integration Architect at Tata Consultancy

Transforms enterprise integration with comprehensive platform and excellent support

The best features of this solution are that everything we get into a single platform, whether it's integration, API, or data modeling; everything is available in one platform. It's a hybrid, including cloud and on-premise solutions with good connectivity and good connectors. From the benefits of using Mule ESB, we could reduce the manual tasks to 50% in one to two years. The cost is still something we are trying to make lower because we see some advantages when we move from point-to-point integration to API-led connectivity. We have seen a lot of reusable assets, so the cost is reduced. Ultimately, we want to see how it's transformed into business revenue; that's what we are still looking into.

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Decreases the development timeframe and costs

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems. Often, customers decide to develop using open-source tools like Spring Boot if there aren't many connectors required to avoid increasing costs. They'll develop this way and then deploy using APIM, the bare minimum needed. It is mainly required for very complicated setups with many connectors. In the implementations I've seen, people often used open-source tools because there weren't many third-party systems involved—just their organization's own systems. From WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I expect them to bring up more and more connectors in the future. That's the main expectation. Having more connectors in various areas will help us when discussing new requirements. I don't have any specific use case right now, so I can't name a particular connector. But, as new technologies emerge, the relevant connectors should be there for those. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly helps with the integration part, which can be simplified only if you have relevant connectors for whatever you're doing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Most of our use cases are for Salesforce. So, the connectors for Salesforce have been really helpful. They've made development two times faster."

"For complex cases, we employ the SSLi engine, whereas for simpler ones like healthcare or response data, such as EDI 270 or 271. We prefer to use an external XRT engine instead of handling it within the ESB for ease of management."

"The most valuable feature of Mule ESB is data transformation, i.e. our interacting with different systems and orchestrating for our business needs."

"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."

"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."

"The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily."

"The architecture based on events has several connectors which allow integration from external and internal applications of the company."

"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard."

More Mule ESB pros

"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."

"The customer service executives are very responsive."

"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."

"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

"It was mostly easy to set up the product."

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

"The learning curve for this solution is very good."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."

"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."

"It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management."

"The initial setup could be more straightforward."

"Lacking some connectors that could be included."

"Community editions need more attention."

"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."

"MuleSoft is not so strong in method-based integration, so they're not so functional in that regard."

More Mule ESB cons

"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."

"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."

"The customization can be a bit difficult."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems."

"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."

"You will not get any support from Mule ESB's team for the tool's community edition...You can get support with the licensed version of Mule ESB."

"This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."

"Mule ESB is an expensive solution."

"Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."

"I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."

"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."

"Regarding licensing and pricing, I find it somewhat flexible. They are more flexible with larger customers compared to small and medium ones, as their licensing model depends on ports and other factors. Large customers benefit from more flexibility in implementation and renewal compared to smaller ones."

More Mule ESB pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	36

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company

I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...

See all answers

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?

Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mule ESB?

The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your ...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 12% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs Mule ESB

Compared 9% of the time

webMethods.io vs Mule ESB

Compared 9% of the time

Neuron ESB vs Mule ESB

Compared 3% of the time

More Mule ESB Competitors

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 11% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB

August 2025

Download Mule ESB product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

August 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Overview

For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

Salesforce

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot

West

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

September 2025

Free Report: Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.