Mule ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MuleSoft Logo
7,428 views|6,102 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
WSO2 Logo
1,777 views|1,249 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard.""It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good.""The architecture based on events has several connectors which allow integration from external and internal applications of the company.""I like that it's user-friendly. Compared to other ESBs, I find it easier to use. I like it better than other ESBs. I like the connectors, which make calling the APIs through the routers easier.""The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another.""Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis.""Most of our use cases are for Salesforce. So, the connectors for Salesforce have been really helpful. They've made development two times faster.""The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily."

More Mule ESB Pros →

"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture.""The stability is excellent.""The installation process is easy.""The learning curve for this solution is very good.""The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable.""It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system.""Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things.""The solution basically conforms to our standards."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Pros →

Cons
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that.""Community editions need more attention.""It should have some amount of logging.""The initial setup is not easy.""Mule ESB isn't as secure as IBM. Financial companies go with IBM for that reason.""Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus.""The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster.""The stability could be improved."

More Mule ESB Cons →

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs.""The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components.""The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required.""I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues.""The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it.""The customization can be a bit difficult.""The integration capabilities need to be improved.""I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor."
  • "Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."
  • "The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."
  • "The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
  • "This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
  • "Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
  • "This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."
  • "I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."
  • More Mule ESB Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."
  • "The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."
  • "The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."
  • "It is a low-cost solution."
  • "The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."
  • "I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
  • More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF on… more »
    Top Answer:Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integration… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
    Top Answer:WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.
    Top Answer:The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive since… more »
    Top Answer:The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components. Some workloads may benefit from optimization or additional features… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    7,428
    Comparisons
    6,102
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    371
    Rating
    8.1
    Views
    1,777
    Comparisons
    1,249
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    545
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

    WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

    Sample Customers
    Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
    West
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company46%
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government6%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 7th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 18 reviews. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, Red Hat Fuse and Fiorano ESB, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Talend Open Studio. See our Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.