No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management vs NinjaOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Ma...
Ranking in Patch Management
24th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NinjaOne
Ranking in Patch Management
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (9th), Network Monitoring Software (21st), Server Monitoring (5th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (8th), Remote Access (10th), Vulnerability Management (27th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (4th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (11th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), MSP Backup (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NinjaOne is 7.9%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
NinjaOne7.9%
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management0.8%
Other91.3%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AK
IT System Specialist at Conseil de l Europe
Patching tasks have become efficient and automated, saving significant time
The primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is patching both servers and computers. I am using it for security control and batch management The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date.…
Not Joseph Pearson - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials
Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support
NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date."
"The tool's most valuable feature is third-party application updates."
"The best feature of NinjaOne is the SLA system. Every IT person can check their performance, how long it takes to resolve an issue, and how many SLAs are breached."
"The customer support at NinjaOne is excellent, rated ten out of ten."
"NinjaOne helped us address our user complaints regarding the system as well as providing us the ability to push software updates directly from NinjaOne to the user's device."
"The policies are probably the most valuable features. They're similar in function to Microsoft group policies where we can have it monitor certain things or push out software on a schedule. I would rate the policies eight out of 10. They're robust, I could monitor most of the things that Windows Performance Monitoring keeps tabs on."
"NinjaOne allows even small teams of three users to support over 400 desktops and keep them up to date and working at peak performance."
"The software's automation tools have solved critical deployment problems for small businesses."
"The best features NinjaOne offers are that I can see every device across the network regardless of location, and it is fantastic at being able to really control everything we have."
 

Cons

"Reporting needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."
"I would like to see the software reduced to focus on inventory or remote help tools since many of its current functionalities are not needed."
"Lacks sufficient integrations with other PSAs."
"The NinjaOne distribution server is highly dependent on an active directory."
"I would like to see more scripts for PowerShell commands."
"It can have more integrations with third-party providers, such as Deep Instinct."
"The graphical user interface could be improved."
"The one feature that I believe needs improvement is the software patching."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"NinjaOne's price is fine since my workplace is an educational institution, so we get the product at a really good price considering that we do not pay taxes, making the prices very fair and worth the product."
"We currently pay $1.20 per device on a monthly basis."
"NinjaOne is a little expensive but is still cheaper than competitors like Acronis or Veeam."
"I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."
"It roughly costs $400 a month. It provides a good value because of the number of tools that you get in the solution. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees."
"The pricing is reasonable and cheaper than ConnectWise."
"Its pricing is great."
"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management?
Reporting ( /categories/reporting ) needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth. Another area that needs enhancement is the integration with proxies, as better integration would be ben...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management?
The primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management ( /products/ivanti-neurons-for-patch-management-reviews ) is patching both servers and computers. I am using it for security control and...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I think it is very reasonable for the product that we get.
What needs improvement with NinjaOne?
NinjaOne can be improved by making mobile usage on the system cheaper because it becomes an expensive commodity.
What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?
My main use case for NinjaOne is patching operating systems and applications. I use NinjaOne for patching security vulnerabilities and ensuring that everything is kept up to date on the network for...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Aconex 4. Adidas 5. AIG 6. Airbus 7. Akamai 8. Alibaba 9. Allianz 10. Amazon 11. American Express 12. Aon 13. Apple 14. ATT 15. Autodesk 16. Aviva 17. Bank of America 18. Barclays 19. Bayer 20. Bechtel 21. BlackRock 22. Boeing 23. BNP Paribas 24. Cisco 25. CocaCola 26. Comcast 27. Credit Suisse 28.Cushman Wakefield 29. Dell 30. Deutsche Bank 31. eBay
Status Pros, Mitchell and Company
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, Vicarius and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2026.
885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.