Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Interfacing Technologies Corporation and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.0, while Nintex is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Interfacing Technologies Corporation holds a 0.1% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

203 Views
110 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,683 Views
2,066 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Nintex Process Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

35th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (29th), GRC (21st), Quality Management Software (18th), Document Management Software (19th)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (11th), Workload Automation (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Vitor Medeiros

National Sales Director at Konica Minolta

Offers capacity to integrate with external platforms but technically difficult

There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms. When we need to develop the forms, we don't have much customization, and I think we need more flexibility there. It's technically difficult, but it would be great to be able to develop our own code and integrate it into the platform. We could then run our own code for specific actions and requests or even develop a page or form. So, if I can ask Nintex for something, it would be a way to integrate our own code for specific actions. When it comes to integration, it could have more options for custom requests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

"Provides the ability to automate SharePoint processes (building sites, lists, updating content). You can also automate document and content processes, onboarding and offboarding, and general IT and HR solutions."

"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."

"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."

"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."

"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."

"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."

"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."

"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."

"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."

"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."

"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."

"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 18% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

July 2025

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

Enterprise Process Center

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?

Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.

What should users look for in reviews?

Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Nintex Process Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.