Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Integrate.io Platform vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Integrate.io Platform
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (73rd), Data Observability (19th)
OpenText Real User Monitoring
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (44th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Integrate.io Platform and OpenText Real User Monitoring aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Integrate.io Platform is designed for Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.0% compared to last year.
OpenText Real User Monitoring, on the other hand, focuses on Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability, holds 0.7% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.
Data Integration Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Integrate.io Platform0.5%
SSIS3.7%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)3.5%
Other92.3%
Data Integration
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Real User Monitoring0.7%
Dynatrace6.3%
Datadog5.3%
Other87.7%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Use Integrate.io Platform?
Leave a review
YA
Sr. Solution Architect, Project Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
User-level monitoring with near-real-time analytics boosts service availability
The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, from a user perspective The functions that Real User Monitor is intended for, which is to provide the…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
11%
Performing Arts
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, f...
What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
 

Also Known As

DRIVEN APM, Xplenty
Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

GAP, Samsung, REA Group, TellApart, Pintrest, Expedia, CapitalOne, Oportun, Hotels.com, HomeAway, CommonwealthBank, D&B, DeerWalk
Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, IBM and others in Data Integration. Updated: January 2026.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.