Infraon IMS vs OpsRamp comparison

Read 13 OpsRamp reviews

5,625 Views
4,163 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

OpsRamp and Infraon IMS are competing products in the IT infrastructure management space. OpsRamp has a slight advantage in deployment speed and scalability, whereas Infraon IMS stands out with its robust feature set and total cost efficiency.

Features: OpsRamp offers real-time infrastructure visibility, automation features, and the ability to manage complex environments. Infraon IMS provides comprehensive asset management, monitoring capabilities, and a rounded approach to IT management.

Room for Improvement: OpsRamp could enhance its personalized support options, expand its hybrid deployment capabilities, and diversify its asset management features. Infraon IMS may benefit from improving deployment speed, enhancing real-time visibility, and increasing operational agility features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpsRamp offers a cloud-based deployment model with quick implementation and efficient customer support focused on digital channels. Infraon IMS provides a hybrid deployment option that requires more setup but offers flexibility and stronger personalized support.

Pricing and ROI: OpsRamp entails a moderate setup cost with excellent ROI for rapid deployment and versatility. Infraon IMS has a higher initial investment but substantial long-term cost savings, appealing ROI for long-term infrastructure stability, and comprehensive management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon IMS vs. OpsRamp Report (Updated: August 2026).

Infraon IMS vs. OpsRamp

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infraon IMS

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

56th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (82nd), Server Monitoring (33rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (49th)

OpsRamp

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

29th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (8th), AIOps (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpsRamp is 1.0%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpsRamp	1.0%
Infraon IMS	0.8%
Other	98.2%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

it_user1631601

GTM Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Our process efficiency has improved by having all the information in one place, which has reduced manpower

The product is great. We integrated the ticketing tool with the monitoring tool. The agent ID creation is very easy when using this tool. It is so user-friendly. The user interface is good and also the pricing is great. The user interface is good, even a business user or layman can raise a ticket. They provide an all-in-one monitoring tool. If an issue happens, it gets integrated with the email, then proactively that ticket is being raised, which is good. The reporting is good. It is very clear. It is a customized report; however you want it, you can customize it. We use the solution’s role-based dashboards. The head of IT wants to use it so he can see holistically what is happening, e.g., what are the tickets being raised, what is a major issue, and what escalations are happening. There are different dashboards that are customized. For our head of IT, we made a separate dashboard. Then, for the executives, we made a separate dashboard based on time, like hourly or daily. All these reports were customized. While they didn't provide a BI dashboard, they provide a kind of graphical dashboard for whatever the issue is. Once you click on a particular ticket, it drills down to the issue, what it is and when the issue was raised. The drill down is good. It is more like a business intelligence (BI) tool. You can just scroll and zoom in. It goes deep into the issue. Once you click a particular dashboard, it will take you to the next page, then it takes you to the issue. Infraon IMS provides workflow automation for real-world use cases. This makes our work easier. It is just drag and drop (no coding) to build the workflows. For example, a particular ticket is being raised. It gets routed to three important IT executives within our team. From our team, it gets routed to the next level. The learning curve is good. Initially, there were no issues. As soon as the users saw the product, they understood what the product was. There wasn't any kind of training required for this product because it is very straightforward.

Read full review

reviewer2732427

System Integration Advisor at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Provides robust infrastructure monitoring with excellent integrations and alert predictions but needs improved AIOps capabilities

If we treat OpsRamp as an infrastructure monitoring tool, there are many positive aspects. However, when viewed as an AIOps tool, there are numerous potential additions. Currently, it performs infrastructure monitoring but has limited capability in application monitoring, which needs improvement. They are introducing observability as a feature where metrics, logs, and traces can be implemented, but this is currently in a primitive state that can grow over time. The platform is very stable, and the UI is excellent. However, regarding AIOps features, enhancements could be made to provide more value, such as dynamic thresholding and other capabilities that competitor tools have, such as LogicMonitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product."

"Being an engineering product, the customization is easy for us compared to SolarWinds and ManageEngine."

"It is a stable product; after the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much, and all systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

"With Infraon, everything is already built-in so you are able to plug-and-play with the system."

More Infraon IMS pros

"Predictive analysis is the most valuable feature; it's very clear in informing us what issues to expect in the future and when they will occur."

"The most valuable feature of OpsRamp is the creation of the dashboards of the infrastructure for the CPU memory and SQL servers, and additionally URL monitoring through Selenium scripting and the availability dashboard is useful."

"We find the product's seamless integration with Zendesk to be extremely valuable to our business."

"What I appreciate most about OpsRamp is that while many tools in the market provide standard monitoring, OpsRamp stands out as a differentiator by providing AIOps features, including correlation, deduplication, and automation where we can run RBA scripts on top of created alerts."

"The technical support is fantastic, and they are fast to respond."

"It is a pretty stable solution."

"Predictive analysis is a valued feature."

"This is what we have achieved, 90% alert reduction, 70% of manual, routine IT processes now automated, 50% increase in team efficiency and productivity."

More OpsRamp pros

Cons

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"Technical support could use some improvement in terms of their response times and diagnostic accuracy."

More Infraon IMS cons

"The user interface of this product requires some changes as it is not inclusively user-friendly. For example, the performance indicators are color-based , which means that they are confusing for anyone who is color blind."

"Currently, it performs infrastructure monitoring but has limited capability in application monitoring, which needs improvement."

"Automation is currently quite complex and needs to be improved."

"An area of improvement would be application monitoring, but OpsRamp is currently working on improving it."

"What's lacking in OpsRamp is process automation, and if there is, I wish there could be more of it, other than just spikes, or it would be better if the alerts can be generated based on different matrices. That option is absent in OpsRamp at the moment, and it would be valuable if that could be provided in the solution, especially if there's any kind of security issue in the VM."

"OpsRamp cannot be scaled for big and large company deployments."

"The function to search any particular device within this solution needs to be improved. Currently, the solution develops a lag when a search, or a comparison, is being carried out."

"The product also tends to release updates first and find out there is an issue later."

More OpsRamp cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"OpsRamp is a cost-effective solution."

"You pay it for a year and you'll have full access to the entire platform, not only for monitoring and alerting, you will have access to the entire platform, and whatever technology they develop will be made available to you."

"There is an annual licensing fee to use OpsRamp."

"I don't have any idea about the licensing cost for OpsRamp, but I just know that its pricing is based on the resource count for each tenant."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpsRamp?

I share the impression that OpsRamp pricing is fair; it does not strike me as expensive, and the licensing model is clear enough.

What needs improvement with OpsRamp?

What is your primary use case for OpsRamp?

Currently, my use case for OpsRamp is using it as an infrastructure monitoring tool for customers, where we can provide infrastructure monitoring as a platform. We can have AI appended to those mon...

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Compared 4% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Datadog vs OpsRamp

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs OpsRamp

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpsRamp

Compared 5% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs OpsRamp

Compared 5% of the time

LogicMonitor vs OpsRamp

Compared 5% of the time

More OpsRamp Competitors

Product Reports

Infraon IMS

Download Infraon IMS product report

Download OpsRamp product report

Also Known As

Everest IMS

No data available

Overview

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

OpsRamp offers a comprehensive IT management platform that enhances business operations through monitoring automation, AIOps, and integration capabilities.

OpsRamp provides a single pane of glass for hybrid infrastructure management, integrating with tools like Zendesk to streamline operations. With predictive analytics and AIOps features such as root cause analysis, it significantly improves IT efficiency. The platform's machine learning, event correlation, and personalized dashboards improve user experience. However, users have noted scalability issues, interface limitations, and patch management inconsistencies, with room for enhancement in network capabilities and ITSM maturity.

What features define OpsRamp?

Single Pane of Glass: Enables seamless monitoring of all IT assets in one dashboard.
Event Correlation: Reduces noise by filtering events and highlighting critical incidents.
Integration Capability: Connects with tools like Zendesk to boost collaboration.
Predictive Analytics: Offers insights through machine learning to anticipate IT issues.
AIOps Automation: Facilitates root cause analysis and automated incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider from OpsRamp reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlined operations through integration and automation.
Improved Collaboration: Better coordination via multi-tenant architecture and shared dashboards.
Increased Accuracy: Machine learning features provide precise reporting and analysis.
Operational Cost Savings: Tools consolidation and predictive features reduce expenses.

OpsRamp is widely implemented for managing and automating IT infrastructure across sectors. Enterprises apply it for Azure infrastructure management, resource threshold setting, and generating alerts. It supports digital transformation through incident management, tools consolidation, and leveraging AI for IT operations, facilitating network and storage device onboarding for customer environments.

Sample Customers

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Epsilon, CloudBrix, GreenPages, NIIT Technologies

Infraon IMS vs. OpsRamp