We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere BPMS and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Earn 20 points
IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 33rd in Process Automation while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with , whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
