We performed a comparison between Appian and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"Process Modeling enables creation of business process workflows. You can create complex business workflows in a visual manner, and it is also easy to debug/monitor."
"The tech support is quite good."
"In terms of interface, it's very good. In terms of infrastructure, it's amazing and already using multiple tools behind the scenes. It's a low-code platform, so it's very easy to implement."
"The technical support is excellent."
"It provides us with real-time data on all connected systems in terms of how they're integrated with each other and how they are performing in a workflow manner."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"There is no UI customization possible."
"The ability of the interface to load automatic data is not great."
"What could be improved is more on the front end perspective, like the user interface and the mobile application aspect."
"The solution could improve by being more responsive when dealing with large quantities of data. Additionally, they can make the decision or rules engine better. It cannot handle too many rules or too many decisions at once."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian."
"Offline capabilities and responsive capabilities could be better. The mobility features of Appian platform are still evolving."
"One of the areas that Appian is working on is to improve its UI capabilities and give more flexibility to the UI."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our Appian vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.