Apache Airflow vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Apache and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Apache is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #40. Apache holds a 2.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Apache Airflow

Read 41 Apache Airflow reviews

6,159 Views
6,097 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews

1,263 Views
1,175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Airflow

OpenText MBPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText MBPM and Apache Airflow compete in the workflow management space. Apache Airflow has a competitive advantage due to its flexibility and integration for data workflows.

Features: OpenText MBPM offers strong process management, compliance capabilities, and is suitable for structured business workflows. Apache Airflow provides support for complex data pipeline orchestration, dynamic scheduling, and monitoring, appealing to data-focused enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText MBPM requires a comprehensive implementation process with professional services and structured customer support. Apache Airflow, as an open-source project, allows for more flexible deployment with community-based support, offering less formal but highly responsive issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText MBPM involves higher initial setup costs but offers a structured ROI through enterprise-level features suited for formal processes. Apache Airflow offers a lower cost of entry, with a favorable ROI for organizations seeking flexible data pipeline solutions without heavy initial investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Airflow vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Airflow vs. OpenText MBPM

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Airflow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText MBPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

40th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Apache Airflow is 2.6%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Airflow	2.6%
OpenText MBPM	0.9%
Other	96.5%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2754210

Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees

Open workflows have simplified data ingestion and curation but still need better UI and scheduler resilience

I think there could be improvements or enhancements in Apache Airflow in terms of having a better UI experience. The UX can be done a bit better. The web interface of Apache Airflow has helped me in tracking and troubleshooting since I'm operational and part of the operational side of Apache Airflow. Mostly, I go into the logs of the web server and scheduler to check what's happening in the back-end instead of looking at the front-end. The UI can give errors related to pipelines, but it can be more improved if we get errors related to import errors and scheduling errors. These areas can be improved. Other than a better UI experience, I would want to see improvements in the scheduler. Sometimes, for user-made mistakes, the scheduler goes down. I experienced this issue and I'm not sure whether it got fixed right now or not. If a user is building a data pipeline in Apache Airflow and a user makes a mistake in their code, that makes the scheduler go down and eventually Apache Airflow goes down. That is not what is expected. If that gets fixed, then it can do wonders.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation

I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its user-friendly interface makes it straightforward to operate, offering a plethora of features for data preparation, buffering, and format conversion."

"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow."

"Apache Airflow is easy for us to use to build machine learning models, transport data, and manage our infrastructure."

"Apache Airflow is easy to scale and its UI improves with each release."

"One of its most valuable features is the graphical user interface, providing a visual representation of the pipeline status, successes, failures, and informative developer messages."

"Apache Airflow is useful for workflow automation, making it capable of automating pipelines, data pipelines, and data warehouse processes."

"I definitely recommend Apache Airflow and would rate it nine out of ten."

"Apache Airflow can be integrated or used to run multiple files."

More Apache Airflow pros

"OpenText MBPM is a stable solution."

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

Cons

"One area for improvement would be to address specific functionalities removed in recent updates that were previously useful for our operations."

"There is a need for more features on experimental evolution steps."

"We cannot run real-time jobs in the solution."

"The solution could be improved by simplifying the integration process and providing access to its support team to guide integration."

"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."

"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."

"Programmatically, it's very good, and it doesn't have any competitors, but you cannot develop anything in Airflow UI. You need to develop everything within the program. In the market, other tools have come up recently as competitors to Airflow, and they also give graphical programming options, whereas Airflow doesn't provide that feature currently. All the DAGs you want to build need to be coded in Python."

"There is an area for improvement in onboarding new people. They should make it simple for newcomers. Else, we have to put a senior engineer to operate it."

More Apache Airflow cons

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apache Airflow is open-source and free. Hyperscalers like Google (with Composer), Azure, and AWS offer managed Airflow services."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"I use the tool's open-source version."

"The solution is free if you use Amazon AWS."

"It is an open-source solution."

"We are using the open-source version of Apache Airflow."

"It is an open-source tool. There are no additional fees or charges associated with the product."

"It's open source. You can install it locally on your own system. If you are deploying it in the production system, you normally deploy it on some cloud, such as EC2 service, which would have some cost. If you are setting up a Docker container or something for Apache Airflow yourself, which is quite easy, you can do pretty much everything online."

More Apache Airflow pricing and cost advice

"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Airflow?

We don't experience issues with pricing as Apache Airflow is part of a larger platform. It is a sub-feature and not an individual purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Airflow?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Apache Airflow

Compared 20% of the time

IBM BPM vs Apache Airflow

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Apache Airflow

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Apache Airflow

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs Apache Airflow

Compared 5% of the time

More Apache Airflow Competitors

IBM BPM vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 12% of the time

Appian vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Process Automation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Case Foundation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText MBPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Airflow

June 2026

Download Apache Airflow product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2026

Download OpenText MBPM product report

Also Known As

Airflow

Metastorm BPM

Overview

Apache Airflow is a Python-based platform that simplifies task scheduling, workflow orchestration, and monitoring of ETL processes with a user-friendly UI and integration capabilities.

Apache Airflow facilitates workflow automation through its open-source framework, offering extensive customization and scalability. Users benefit from its visual DAG representation, event-based scheduling, and task retry functionality. Frequent updates and rich integration features allow seamless interaction with platforms like AWS and Google Cloud, while Python-friendly configurations enable robust error handling and notifications. Despite requiring improvements in integration and documentation, its application spans industries such as technology, finance, and entertainment, supporting tasks like data ingestion and synchronization.

What are the key features of Apache Airflow?

User-Friendly UI: Simplifies monitoring and management of ETL tasks.
Visual DAG Representation: Offers clear visualization of task dependencies.
Event-Based Scheduling: Automates workflow actions based on specific triggers.
Task Retry Capabilities: Enhances reliability through automatic task retries.
Python-Based Customization: Allows flexible and extensive feature customization.
Open-Source: Supports continuous updates and integration capabilities.

What benefits should users consider in judging Apache Airflow?

Workflow Automation: Streamlines and enhances efficiency in process execution.
Error Handling: Improves task reliability with effective error management.
Integration with Cloud Platforms: Enhances flexibility with AWS and Google Cloud compatibility.
Scalability: Supports growing infrastructural needs with ease.

Apache Airflow's deployment in industries like technology, finance, and entertainment is primarily focused on automating ETL processes, managing media workflows, and orchestrating data transformation tasks. It effectively integrates with tools such as SQL scripts and Databricks, enabling organizations to manage data pipelines efficiently in both cloud and on-premises environments.

Apache

OpenText MBPM is a comprehensive business process management tool designed to improve workflow efficiency and streamline operations. It offers robust capabilities for process automation and monitoring, catering to businesses looking for efficiency and productivity enhancements.

Known for its ability to transform business processes, OpenText MBPM delivers efficient workflow automation and detailed process monitoring. Its integration capabilities facilitate seamless operations across diverse enterprise systems, helping businesses innovate while maintaining compliance with industry standards. The platform provides customizable features that enhance operational efficiency, enabling organizations to adapt quickly to changing business requirements.

What are the key features of OpenText MBPM?

Process Automation: Streamlines complex workflows by automating repetitive tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with existing enterprise systems for improved collaboration.
Customizable Workflows: Provides tools to create tailored workflows that suit specific business processes.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers insights into process performance through detailed analytics.
Compliance Support: Ensures business processes align with regulatory requirements.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces manual labor and errors, leading to cost savings.
Scalability: Supports business growth without extensive reconfiguration.
Improved Compliance: Helps meet industry regulations, reducing risk.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides clear insights into process performance.
Faster Time-to-Market: Accelerates deployment of new processes and products.

OpenText MBPM is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing to streamline operations and ensure compliance. In finance, it automates loan processing, reducing approval times while maintaining compliance. Healthcare organizations use it to enhance patient care workflows, optimize resource allocation, and improve patient data management. In manufacturing, it aids in process optimization ensuring product quality and regulatory compliance.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Agari, WePay, Astronomer

Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Apache Airflow vs. OpenText MBPM

June 2026

Free Report: Apache Airflow vs. OpenText MBPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Airflow vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Airflow vs. OpenText MBPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.