We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"Since the solution is programmatic, it allows users to define pipelines in code rather than drag and drop."
"Its user-friendly interface makes it straightforward to operate, offering a plethora of features for data preparation, buffering, and format conversion."
"Designing processes and workflows is easier, and it assists in coordinating all of the different processes."
"Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."
"The solution's UI allows me to collect all the information and see the code lines."
"We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"We cannot run real-time jobs in the solution."
"The documentation must be improved."
"We need to develop our workflow description and notations because out of the box, Apache Airflow does not provide some features that are needed."
"Apache Airflow could be improved by integrating some versioning principles."
"There is a need for more features on experimental evolution steps."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our Apache Airflow vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.